Trading Interests: Domestic Institutions, International Negotiations, and the Politics of Trade

被引:28
作者
Betz, Timm [1 ]
机构
[1] Texas A&M Univ, Polit Sci, College Stn, TX 77843 USA
关键词
MAJORITARIAN POLITICS; PROTECTIONIST BIAS; LEVEL EVIDENCE; POLICY; COUNTRIES; ECONOMY; LIBERALIZATION; REFORM; DEMOCRACY;
D O I
10.1086/692476
中图分类号
D0 [政治学、政治理论];
学科分类号
0302 ; 030201 ;
摘要
To explain trade policies, a large literature draws on domestic institutions. Institutions that are more responsive to narrow-interest groups are expected to succumb to protectionist demands, resulting in higher average tariffs. This literature has largely ignored the role of reciprocal trade agreements and of exporter interests. This joint omission results in a biased view of trade politics. Exporters benefit from expanding market access abroad. With reciprocity, they lobby for domestic tariff cuts in exchange for liberalization abroad, which alters the link between domestic institutions and trade policies. Institutions favoring narrow interests should privilege both protectionist groups and exporters and hence have an indeterminate effect on average tariff levels. Instead, more interest group influence should result in more dispersed tariff rates across products. This article provides empirical evidence for this proposition, helps reconcile existing findings in the literature, and offers a specific example of how international institutions affect domestic politics.
引用
收藏
页码:1237 / 1252
页数:16
相关论文
共 60 条
[1]   Sequential exporting [J].
Albornoz, Facundo ;
Pardo, Hector F. Calvo ;
Corcos, Gregory ;
Ornelas, Emanuel .
JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL ECONOMICS, 2012, 88 (01) :17-31
[2]   The political economy of international trade - Enduring puzzles and an agenda for inquiry [J].
Alt, JE ;
Frieden, J ;
Gilligan, MJ ;
Rodrik, D ;
Rogowski, R .
COMPARATIVE POLITICAL STUDIES, 1996, 29 (06) :689-717
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2007, INT I NATL POLICIES
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2014, ATLAS EC COMPLEXITY
[5]   The Distributional Consequences of Preferential Trade Liberalization: Firm-Level Evidence [J].
Baccini, Leonardo ;
Pinto, Pablo M. ;
Weymouth, Stephen .
INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATION, 2017, 71 (02) :373-395
[6]   International Institutions and Domestic Politics: Can Preferential Trading Agreements Help Leaders Promote Economic Reform? [J].
Baccini, Leonardo ;
Urpelainen, Johannes .
JOURNAL OF POLITICS, 2014, 76 (01) :195-214
[7]   The institutional roots of American trade policy [J].
Bailey, MA ;
Goldstein, J ;
Weingast, BR .
WORLD POLITICS, 1997, 49 (03) :309-&
[8]   New tools in comparative political economy: The database of political institutions [J].
Beck, T ;
Clarke, G ;
Groff, A ;
Keefer, P ;
Walsh, P .
WORLD BANK ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2001, 15 (01) :165-176
[9]   Exceptional exporter performance: cause, effect, or both? [J].
Bernard, AB ;
Jensen, JB .
JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL ECONOMICS, 1999, 47 (01) :1-25
[10]   Firms in international trade [J].
Bernard, Andrew B. ;
Jensen, J. Bradford ;
Redding, Stephen J. ;
Schott, Peter K. .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC PERSPECTIVES, 2007, 21 (03) :105-130