Governance of Intersectoral Collaborations for Population Health and to Reduce Health Inequalities in High-income Countries: A Complexity-Informed Systematic Review

被引:22
作者
Such, Elizabeth [1 ]
Smith, Katherine [2 ]
Woods, Helen [1 ]
Meier, Petra [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sheffield, Sch Hlth & Related Res, Sheffield, S Yorkshire, England
[2] Univ Strathclyde, Glasgow, Lanark, Scotland
[3] Univ Glasgow, Inst Hlth & Wellbeing, MRC CSA Social & Publ Hlth Sci Unit, Glasgow, Lanark, Scotland
基金
英国工程与自然科学研究理事会; 美国国家卫生研究院; 英国经济与社会研究理事会; 英国医学研究理事会; 英国自然环境研究理事会;
关键词
Intersectoral Collaboration; Health in All Policies; Healthy Public Policy; Health Inequalities; Health Equity; Governance; PUBLIC-HEALTH; QUALITATIVE EVIDENCE; POLICIES; IMPLEMENTATION; INTERVENTIONS; PARTNERSHIPS; SERVICES; WORKING; IMPACT; GUIDE;
D O I
10.34172/ijhpm.2022.6550
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: A 'Health in All Policies' (HiAP) approach has been widely advocated as a way to involve multiple government sectors in addressing health inequalities, but implementation attempts have not always produced the expected results. Explaining how HiAP-style collaborations have been governed may offer insights into how to improve population health and reduce health inequalities. Methods: Theoretically focused systematic review. Synthesis of evidence from evaluative studies into a causal logic model. Results: Thirty-one publications based on 40 case studies from nine high-income countries were included. Intersectoral collaborations for population health and equity were multi component and multi-dimensional with collaborative activity spanning policy, strategy, service design and service delivery. Governance of intersectoral collaboration included structural and relational components. Both internal and external legitimacy and credibility delivered collaborative power, which in turn enabled intersectoral collaboration. Internal legitimacy was driven by multiple structural elements and processes. Many of these were instrumental in developing (often-fragile) relational trust. Internal credibility was supported by multi-level collaborations that were adequately resourced and shared power. External legitimacy and credibility was created through meaningful community engagement, leadership that championed collaborations and the identification of 'win-win' strategies. External factors such as economic shocks and short political cycles reduced collaborative power. Conclusion: This novel review, using systems thinking and causal loop representations, offers insights into how collaborations can generate internal and external legitimacy and credibility. This offers promise for future collaborative activity for population health and equity; it presents a clearer picture of what structural and relational components and dynamics collaborative partners can focus on when planning and implementing HiAP initiatives. The limits of the literature base, however, does not make it possible to identify if or how this might deliver improved population health or health equity.
引用
收藏
页码:2780 / 2792
页数:13
相关论文
共 89 条
[41]  
Horton Marie, 2021, Wellcome Open Res, V6, P6, DOI 10.12688/wellcomeopenres.16318.1
[42]   Partnership working in public health: the implications for governance of a systems approach [J].
Hunter, David ;
Perkins, Neil .
JOURNAL OF HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH & POLICY, 2012, 17 :45-52
[43]   Increasing Opportunities for Health in a Southeast Michigan Community Through Local Policy Change [J].
Kelly, R. Patrick ;
Burke, Jodi ;
Waddell, Sandra ;
Lachance, Laurie .
HEALTH PROMOTION PRACTICE, 2019, 20 (01) :116-127
[44]   How and why do win-win strategies work in engaging policy-makers to implement Health in All Policies? A multiple-case study of six state- and national-level governments [J].
Kokkinen, Lauri ;
Freiler, Alix ;
Muntaner, Carles ;
Shankardass, Ketan .
HEALTH RESEARCH POLICY AND SYSTEMS, 2019, 17 (01)
[45]   Promoting Intersectoral Collaboration Through the Evaluations of Public Health Interventions: Insights From Key Informants in 6 European Countries [J].
Kriegner, Sabrina ;
Ottersen, Trygve ;
Rottingen, John-Arne ;
Gopinathan, Unni .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HEALTH POLICY AND MANAGEMENT, 2021, 10 (02) :67-76
[46]   Lessons Learned From Food & Fitness About Building Successful Partnerships: Focus, Capacity, and Sustainability [J].
Lachance, Laurie ;
Quinn, Martha ;
Kowalski-Dobson, Theresa .
HEALTH PROMOTION PRACTICE, 2018, 19 :115S-124S
[47]   The Food & Fitness Community Partnerships: Results From 9 Years of Local Systems and Policy Changes to Increase Equitable Opportunities for Health [J].
Lachance, Laurie ;
Quinn, Martha ;
Kowalski-Dobson, Theresa .
HEALTH PROMOTION PRACTICE, 2018, 19 :92S-114S
[48]   Use of a knowledge broker to establish healthy public policies in a city district: a developmental evaluation [J].
Langeveld, Kirsten ;
Stronks, Karien ;
Harting, Janneke .
BMC PUBLIC HEALTH, 2016, 16
[49]   Health in All Policies: Evaluating the South Australian Approach to Intersectoral Action for Health [J].
Lawless, Angela ;
Williams, Carmel ;
Hurley, Catherine ;
Wildgoose, Deborah ;
Sawford, Amy ;
Kickbusch, Ilona .
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH-REVUE CANADIENNE DE SANTE PUBLIQUE, 2012, 103 (07) :S15-S19
[50]   Trends in health inequalities in 27 European countries [J].
Mackenbach, Johan P. ;
Valverde, Jose Rubio ;
Artnik, Barbara ;
Bopp, Matthias ;
Bronnum-Hansen, Henrik ;
Deboosere, Patrick ;
Kalediene, Ramune ;
Kovacs, Katalin ;
Leinsalu, Mall ;
Martikainen, Pekka ;
Menvielle, Gwenn ;
Regidor, Enrique ;
Rychtarikova, Jitka ;
Rodriguez-Sanz, Maica ;
Vineis, Paolo ;
Whiten, Chris ;
Wojtyniak, Bogdan ;
Hu, Yannan ;
Nusselder, Wilma J. .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2018, 115 (25) :6440-6445