Does the use of telephone reminders to increase survey response rates affect outcome estimates? An ancillary analysis of a prospective cohort study of patients with low back pain

被引:2
作者
Udby, Christina Lyngso [1 ,2 ]
Riis, Allan [3 ,4 ]
Thomsen, Janus Laust [4 ]
Rolving, Nanna [5 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Aarhus Univ, Dept Publ Hlth, Nordre Ringvej 1, DK-8000 Aarhus, Denmark
[2] Aalborg Univ Hosp, Dept Physiotherapy & Occupat Therapy, Hobrovej 18-22, DK-9000 Aalborg, Denmark
[3] Univ Coll Northern Denmark, Dept Physiotherapy, Selma Lagerlofs Vej 2, DK-9220 Aalborg O, Denmark
[4] Aalborg Univ, Ctr Gen Practice, DK-9220 Aalborg O, Denmark
[5] Silkeborg Reg Hosp, Diagnost Ctr, Falkevej 1-3, DK-8600 Silkeborg, Denmark
[6] DEFACTUM, Aarhus, Central Denmark, Denmark
关键词
Research design; Reminder systems; Patient outcome assessment; Low Back pain; FOLLOW-UP; NONRESPONSE BIAS; NATURAL-HISTORY; DISABILITY; QUESTIONNAIRE; EQUIVALENCE; GUIDELINES;
D O I
10.1186/s12891-021-04787-4
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Research is often undertaken using patient-reported outcomes from questionnaires. Achieving a high response rate demands expensive and time-consuming methods like telephone reminders. However, it is unknown whether telephone reminders change outcome estimates or only affect the response rate in research of populations with low back pain (LBP). The aim is to compare baseline characteristics and the change in outcome between patients responding before and after receiving a telephone reminder. Methods: This is an ancillary analysis of data from a prospective cohort study employing questionnaires from 812 adults with LBP lasting more than 3 months. Patients not responding to the 52-week questionnaire were sent reminder emails after two and 3 weeks and delivered postal reminders after 4 weeks. Patients still not responding were contacted by telephone, with a maximum of two attempts. Patients were categorised into three groups: 1) patients responding before a telephone reminder was performed; 2) patients responding after the telephone reminder and 3) patients not responding at all. A positive outcome was defined as a 30% improvement on the Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire after 52 weeks. Results: A total of 695 patients (85.2%) responded. Of these, 643 patients were classified in Group 1 and 52 patients were classified in Group 2. One hundred seventeen were classified in Group 3. No differences in outcome or baseline characteristics was found. In Group 1, 41.3% had a positive outcome, and in Group 2 48.9% had a positive outcome (P = 0.297). In group 3, non-respondents were younger, more often unemployed, more often smokers, more often reported co-morbidity, and reported higher depression scores than respondents. Conclusions: Using a telephone reminder had no consequence on outcome estimates nor were there any differences in baseline characteristics between patients who responded before or after the telephone reminder.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 40 条
  • [1] Albert Hanne B, 2003, Ugeskr Laeger, V165, P1875
  • [2] Armstrong B., 1995, PRINCIPLES EXPOSURE
  • [3] Cost-effectiveness of follow-up contact for a postal survey: a randomised controlled trial
    Breen, Courtney L.
    Shakeshaft, Anthony P.
    Doran, Christopher M.
    Sanson-Fisher, Rob W.
    Mattick, Richard P.
    [J]. AUSTRALIAN AND NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2010, 34 (05) : 508 - 512
  • [4] Contribution of follow-up of nonresponders to prevalence and risk estimates: a Norwegian respiratory health survey
    Brogger, J
    Bakke, P
    Eide, GE
    Gulsvik, A
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2003, 157 (06) : 558 - 566
  • [5] A method for achieving high response rates in national surveys of US primary care physicians
    Brtnikova, Michaels
    Crane, Lori A.
    Allison, Mandy A.
    Hurley, Laura P.
    Beaty, Brenda L.
    Kempe, Allison
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2018, 13 (08):
  • [6] The pain, depression, disability pathway in those with low back pain: a moderation analysis of health locus of control
    Campbell, Paul
    Hope, Kate
    Dunn, Kate M.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PAIN RESEARCH, 2017, 10 : 2331 - 2339
  • [7] The effect of multiple reminders on response patterns in a Danish health survey
    Christensen, Anne I.
    Ekholm, Ola
    Kristensen, Peter L.
    Larsen, Finn B.
    Vinding, Anker L.
    Gluemer, Charlotte
    Juel, Knud
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2015, 25 (01) : 156 - 161
  • [8] Recommendations on Evidence Needed to Support Measurement Equivalence between Electronic and Paper-Based Patient-Reported Outcome (PRO) Measures: ISPOR ePRO Good Research Practices Task Force Report
    Coons, Stephen Joel
    Gwaltney, Chad J.
    Hays, Ron D.
    Lundy, J. Jason
    Sloan, Jeff A.
    Revicki, Dennis A.
    Lenderking, William R.
    Cella, David
    Basch, Ethan
    [J]. VALUE IN HEALTH, 2009, 12 (04) : 419 - 429
  • [9] Contributions of prognostic factors for poor outcome in primary care low back pain patients
    Dunn, Kate M.
    Jordan, Kelvin P.
    Croft, Peter R.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PAIN, 2011, 15 (03) : 313 - 319
  • [10] Edwards P, 2007, COCHRANE DB SYST REV, DOI [10.1002/14651858.MR000008.pub3, 10.1002/14651858.MR000008.pub4]