Studies on the radiation dose, image quality and low contrast detectability from MSCT abdomen by using low tube voltage

被引:5
作者
Mokhtar, A. [1 ]
Aabdelbary, Z. A. [2 ]
Sarhan, A. [1 ,2 ]
Gad, H. M. [1 ]
Ahmed, M. T. [2 ]
机构
[1] Mansoura Univ, Radiol Dept, Urol & Nephrol Ctr, Mansoura, Egypt
[2] Mansoura Univ, Fac Sci, Phys Dept, Mansoura, Egypt
关键词
Multislice CT; Radiation dose; Image qualityCT ACR phantom; CT ANGIOGRAPHY; ITERATIVE RECONSTRUCTION; AMERICAN-COLLEGE; ABDOMINAL CT; REDUCTION; RISK; EXPOSURE; TUMORS;
D O I
10.1186/s43055-021-00613-y
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Background To study radiation dose, image quality and low-contrast cylinder detectability from multislice CT (MSCT) abdomen by using low tube voltage using the American College of Radiology (ACR) phantom. The ACR phantom (low-contrast module) was scanned with 64 MSCT scanner (Brilliance, Philips Medical System, Eindhoven, Netherlands) with 80 and 120 KVP, utilizing different tube current time product (mAs) range from 50 to 380 mAs. The image noise (SD), signal to noise ratio, contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), and scores of low contrast detectability were assessed for every image respectively. Results From images analyses, the noise essentially increased with the use of low tube voltage. The CNR was 0.94 +/- 0.27 at 120 KVP, and CNR was 0.43 +/- 0.22 at 80 KVP. However, with the same dose, there were no differences of statistical significance in scores of low-contrast detectability between 120 KVP at 300mAs and 80 KVP at (200-380) mAs (p > 0.05). At 300 mAs, the CTDIvol obtained at 80 KVP was about 29% of that at 120 KVP. The CTDIvol obtained at 80 KVP were decreased from 5% at 50 mAs, to 37% at 380 mAs. Conclusions There is a possibility to decrease exposure of radiation virtually by reducing KVP from 120 to 80 KVP in examination of abdominal CT when the high tube current is used, though increasing image noise at low tube voltage.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 34 条
  • [1] ACR, 2017, AM COLL RAD CT ACCR
  • [2] ACR CT Accreditation phantom, 2019, GAMM
  • [3] Alsafi K., 2016, INT J RADIOL IMAGING, V2, P1, DOI [10.23937/2572-3235.1510016, DOI 10.23937/2572-3235.1510016]
  • [4] Volume computed tomography dose index (CTDIvol) and size-specific dose estimate (SSDE) for tube current modulation (TCM) in CT scanning
    Anam, C.
    Haryanto, F.
    Widita, R.
    Arif, I
    Dougherty, G.
    McLean, D.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION RESEARCH, 2018, 16 (03): : 289 - 297
  • [5] [Anonymous], 2009, National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurement report No. 160: Ionizing radiation exposure of the population of the United States
  • [6] [Anonymous], 2016, TOMOGRAPHIC RECONSTR
  • [7] [Anonymous], 2013, CT ACCR PHANT INSTR
  • [8] Effect of radiation dose reduction on image quality in adult head CT with noise-suppressing reconstruction system with a 256 slice MDCT
    Baskan, Ozdil
    Erol, Cengiz
    Ozbek, Hanefi
    Paksoy, Yahya
    [J]. JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2015, 16 (03): : 285 - 296
  • [9] A simple method for low-contrast detectability, image quality and dose optimisation with CT iterative reconstruction algorithms and model observers
    Bellesi L.
    Wyttenbach R.
    Gaudino D.
    Colleoni P.
    Pupillo F.
    Carrara M.
    Braghetti A.
    Puligheddu C.
    Presilla S.
    [J]. European Radiology Experimental, 1 (1)
  • [10] Impact of a Reduced Tube Voltage on CT Angiography and Radiation Dose Results of the PROTECTION I Study
    Bischoff, Bernhard
    Hein, Franziska
    Meyer, Tanja
    Hadamitzky, Martin
    Martinoff, Stefan
    Schoemig, Albert
    Hausleiter, Joerg
    [J]. JACC-CARDIOVASCULAR IMAGING, 2009, 2 (08) : 940 - 946