Concurrent resistance and endurance training influence basal metabolic rate in nondieting individuals

被引:137
作者
Dolezal, BA [1 ]
Potteiger, JA [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Kansas, Dept Hlth Sport & Exercise Sci, Exercise Physiol Lab, Lawrence, KS 66045 USA
关键词
metabolism; exercise; energy expenditure; urinary urea nitrogen; weight loss;
D O I
10.1152/jappl.1998.85.2.695
中图分类号
Q4 [生理学];
学科分类号
071003 ;
摘要
Thirty physically active healthy men (20.1 +/- 1.6 yr) were randomly assigned to participate for 10 wk in one of the following training groups: endurance trained (ET; 3 days/wk jogging and/or running), resistance trained (RT; 3 days/wk. resistance training), or combined endurance and resistance trained (CT). Before and after training, basal metabolic rate (BMR), percent body fat (BF), maximal aerobic power, and one-repetition maximum for bench press and parallel squat were determined for each subject. Urinary urea nitrogen was determined pre-, mid-, and posttraining. BMR increased significantly from pre- to posttraining for RT (7,613 +/- 968 to 8,090 +/- 951 kJ/day) and CT (7,455 +/- 964 to 7,802 +/- 981 kJ/day) but not for ET (7,231 +/- 554 to 7,029 +/- 666 kJ/day). BF for CT (12.2 +/- 3.5 to 8.7 +/- 1.7%) was significantly reduced compared with RT (15.4 +/- 2.7 to 14.0 +/- 2.7%) and ET (11.8 +/- 2.9 to 9.5 +/- 1.7%). Maximal aerobic power increased significantly for ET (13%) but not RT (-0.2%) or CT (7%), whereas the improvements in one-repetition maximum bench press and parallel squat were greater in RT (24 and 23%, respectively) compared with CT (19 and 12%, respectively). Urinary urea nitrogen loss was greater in ET (14.6 +/- 0.9 g/24 h) than in RT (11.7 +/- 1.0 g/24 h) and CT (11.5 +/- 1.0 g/24 h) at the end of 10 wk of training. These data indicate that, although RT alone will increase BMR and muscular strength, and ET alone will increase aerobic power and decrease BF, CT will provide all of these benefits but to a lesser magnitude than RT and ET after 10 wk of training.
引用
收藏
页码:695 / 700
页数:6
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]   RESTING METABOLIC-RATE AND CORONARY-HEART-DISEASE RISK-FACTORS IN AEROBICALLY AND RESISTANCE-TRAINED WOMEN [J].
BALLOR, DL ;
POEHLMAN, ET .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NUTRITION, 1992, 56 (06) :968-974
[2]   PHYSIOLOGICAL ADAPTATIONS TO CONCURRENT ENDURANCE TRAINING AND LOW VELOCITY RESISTANCE TRAINING [J].
BELL, GJ ;
PETERSEN, SR ;
WESSEL, J ;
BAGNALL, K ;
QUINNEY, HA .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 1991, 12 (04) :384-390
[3]   FAMILIAL DEPENDENCE OF THE RESTING METABOLIC-RATE [J].
BOGARDUS, C ;
LILLIOJA, S ;
RAVUSSIN, E ;
ABBOTT, W ;
ZAWADZKI, JK ;
YOUNG, A ;
KNOWLER, WC ;
JACOBOWITZ, R ;
MOLL, PP .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1986, 315 (02) :96-100
[4]   THE EFFECTS OF EITHER HIGH-INTENSITY RESISTANCE OR ENDURANCE TRAINING ON RESTING METABOLIC-RATE [J].
BROEDER, CE ;
BURRHUS, KA ;
SVANEVIK, LS ;
WILMORE, JH .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NUTRITION, 1992, 55 (04) :802-810
[5]   STRENGTH AND ENDURANCE TRAINING - ARE THEY MUTUALLY EXCLUSIVE [J].
DUDLEY, GA ;
FLECK, SJ .
SPORTS MEDICINE, 1987, 4 (02) :79-85
[6]   INCOMPATIBILITY OF ENDURANCE-TRAINING AND STRENGTH-TRAINING MODES OF EXERCISE [J].
DUDLEY, GA ;
DJAMIL, R .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYSIOLOGY, 1985, 59 (05) :1446-1451
[7]  
FLECK SJ, 1988, PHYSICIAN SPORTSMED, V16, P108, DOI 10.1080/00913847.1988.11709485
[8]  
Hennessy L.C., 1994, J. Strength Cond. Res, V8, P12, DOI DOI 10.1519/00124278-199402000-00003
[9]   POTENTIAL FOR STRENGTH AND ENDURANCE TRAINING TO AMPLIFY ENDURANCE PERFORMANCE [J].
HICKSON, RC ;
DVORAK, BA ;
GOROSTIAGA, EM ;
KUROWSKI, TT ;
FOSTER, C .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYSIOLOGY, 1988, 65 (05) :2285-2290
[10]   INTERFERENCE OF STRENGTH DEVELOPMENT BY SIMULTANEOUSLY TRAINING FOR STRENGTH AND ENDURANCE [J].
HICKSON, RC .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYSIOLOGY AND OCCUPATIONAL PHYSIOLOGY, 1980, 45 (2-3) :255-263