Abbreviated Breast MRI Utilization: A Survey of the Society of Breast Imaging

被引:8
作者
Grimm, Lars J. [1 ]
Conant, Emily F. [2 ]
Dialani, Vandana M. [3 ]
Dontchos, Brian N. [4 ]
Harvey, Jennifer A. [5 ]
Kacharia, Vidhi S. [6 ]
Plecha, Donna M. [7 ]
Mango, Victoria L. [8 ]
机构
[1] Duke Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Radiol, Durham, NC 27710 USA
[2] Univ Penn, Dept Radiol, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
[3] Beth Israel Deaconess Med Ctr, Dept Radiol, 330 Brookline Ave, Boston, MA 02215 USA
[4] Massachusetts Gen Hosp, Dept Radiol, Boston, MA USA
[5] Univ Rochester, Med Ctr, Dept Imaging Sci, Rochester, NY 14642 USA
[6] Einstein Hlth, Philadelphia, PA USA
[7] Case Western Reserve Univ, Dept Radiol, Cleveland, OH 44106 USA
[8] Mem Sloan Kettering Canc Ctr, 1275 York Ave, New York, NY 10021 USA
关键词
MRI; abbreviated breast MRI; survey; Society of Breast Imaging; PERFORMANCE;
D O I
10.1093/jbi/wbac048
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Objective To survey Society of Breast Imaging (SBI) membership on their use of abbreviated breast MRI to understand variability in practice patterns. Methods A survey was developed by the SBI Patient Care and Delivery committee for distribution to SBI membership in July and August 2021. Eighteen questions queried practice demographics and then abbreviated breast MRI practices regarding initial adoption, scheduling and finances, MRI protocols, and interpretations. Comparisons between responses were made by practice demographics. Results There were 321 respondents (response rate: 15.3%), of whom 25% (81/321) currently offer and 26% (84/321) plan to offer abbreviated breast MRI. Practices in the South (37/107, 35%) and Midwest (22/70, 31%) were more likely to offer abbreviated MRI (P = 0.005). Practices adopted many strategies to raise awareness, most directed at referring providers. The mean charge to patients was $414, and only 6% of practices offer financial support. The median time slot for studies is 20 minutes, with only 15% of practices using block scheduling of consecutive breast MRIs. Regarding MRI protocols, 64% (37/58) of respondents included only a single first-pass post-contrast sequence, and 90% (52/58) included T2-weighted sequences. Patient eligibility was highly varied, and a majority of respondents (37/58, 64%) do not provide any recommendations for screening intervals in non-high-risk women. Conclusion Abbreviated breast MRI utilization is growing rapidly, and practices are applying a variety of strategies to facilitate adoption. Although there is notable variability in patient eligibility, follow-up intervals, and costs, there is some agreement regarding abbreviated breast MRI protocols.
引用
收藏
页码:506 / 512
页数:7
相关论文
共 20 条
  • [1] A meta-analysis comparing the diagnostic performance of abbreviated MRI and a full diagnostic protocol in breast cancer
    Baxter, G. C.
    Selamoglu, A.
    Mackay, J. W.
    Bond, S.
    Gray, E.
    Gilbert, F. J.
    [J]. CLINICAL RADIOLOGY, 2021, 76 (02) : 154.e23 - 154.e32
  • [2] Comparison of Study Activity Times for "Full" versus "Fast MRI" for Breast Cancer Screening
    Borthakur, Arijitt
    Weinstein, Susan P.
    Schnall, Mitchell D.
    Conant, Emily F.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF RADIOLOGY, 2019, 16 (08) : 1046 - 1051
  • [3] Comparison of Abbreviated Breast MRI vs Digital Breast Tomosynthesis for Breast Cancer Detection Among Women With Dense Breasts Undergoing Screening
    Comstock, Christopher E.
    Gatsonis, Constantine
    Newstead, Gillian M.
    Snyder, Bradley S.
    Gareen, Ilana F.
    Bergin, Jennifer T.
    Rahbar, Habib
    Sung, Janice S.
    Jacobs, Christina
    Harvey, Jennifer A.
    Nicholson, Mary H.
    Ward, Robert C.
    Holt, Jacqueline
    Prather, Andrew
    Miller, Kathy D.
    Schnall, Mitchell D.
    Kuhl, Christiane K.
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2020, 323 (08): : 746 - 756
  • [4] The potential utility of abbreviated breast MRI (FAST MRI) as a tool for breast cancer screening: a systematic review and meta-analysisq
    Geach, R.
    Jones, L., I
    Harding, S. A.
    Marshall, A.
    Taylor-Phillips, S.
    McKeown-Keegan, S.
    Dunn, J. A.
    [J]. CLINICAL RADIOLOGY, 2021, 76 (02) : 154.e11 - 154.e22
  • [5] Comparison between an abbreviated and full MRI protocol for detecting additional disease when doing breast cancer staging
    Girometti, Rossano
    Nitti, Adriana
    Lorenzon, Michele
    Greco, Franco
    Londero, Viviana
    Zuiani, Chiara
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2019, 49 (07) : E222 - E230
  • [6] Implementation of Abbreviated Breast MRI for Screening: AJR Expert Panel Narrative Review
    Grimm, Lars J.
    Mango, Victoria L.
    Harvey, Jennifer A.
    Plecha, Donna M.
    Conant, Emily F.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2022, 218 (02) : 202 - 212
  • [7] Solitary, Well-Circumscribed, T2 Hyperintense Masses on MRI Have Very Low Malignancy Rates
    Grimm, Lars J.
    Enslow, Michael
    Ghate, Sujata, V
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BREAST IMAGING, 2019, 1 (01) : 37 - 42
  • [8] Characteristics and outcome of enhancing foci followed on breast MRI with management implications
    Ha, R.
    Sung, J.
    Lee, C.
    Comstock, C.
    Wynn, R.
    Morris, E.
    [J]. CLINICAL RADIOLOGY, 2014, 69 (07) : 715 - 720
  • [9] Evaluation of a known breast cancer using an abbreviated breast MRI protocol: Correlation of imaging characteristics and pathology with lesion detection and conspicuity
    Heacock, Laura
    Melsaether, Amy N.
    Heller, Samantha L.
    Gao, Yiming
    Pysarenko, Kristine M.
    Babb, James S.
    Kim, Sungheon G.
    Moy, Linda
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2016, 85 (04) : 815 - 823
  • [10] Abbreviated magnetic resonance imaging in breast cancer: A systematic review of literature
    Hernandez, Maria Liliana
    Osorio, Santiago
    Florez, Katherine
    Ospino, Alejandra
    Diaz, Gloria M.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY OPEN, 2021, 8