Effects of Individual and Group Metacognitive Prompts on Tertiary-Level Students' Metacognitive Awareness and Writing Outcomes

被引:6
作者
Teng, Mark Feng [1 ]
机构
[1] Beijing Normal Univ, Ctr Linguist Sci, Zhuhai, Peoples R China
关键词
Metacognition; Writing; Cooperative learning; Metacognitive prompts; Metacognitive awareness; Regulatory ability; INSTRUCTION; ACHIEVEMENT; COLLABORATION; KNOWLEDGE; COGNITION; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1007/s40299-021-00611-8
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Recent research has highlighted the value of incorporating metacognitive prompts into cooperative learning. This study explores effects of the presence or absence of metacognitive prompts in group or individual learning on metacognitive awareness and EFL writing outcomes. A total of 170 university students were assigned to one of four treatment conditions: collaborative learning with metacognitive prompts (COOP + META), collaborative learning without metacognitive prompts (COOP), individual learning with metacognitive prompts (INDI + META), and individual learning without metacognitive prompts (INDI). After treatment, learners exposed to metacognitive prompts in a cooperative learning setting outperformed the other groups in metacognitive awareness and EFL writing. Multiple regression analysis also showed that enhanced metacognitive awareness significantly predicted English writing outcomes. Results revealed metacognitive regulation was a more significant predictor of writing outcome. These findings highlight the importance of incorporating metacognitive prompts within collaborative writing settings.
引用
收藏
页码:601 / 612
页数:12
相关论文
共 40 条
[1]   Investigating the impact of peer feedback in foreign language writing [J].
Altstaedter, Laura Levi .
INNOVATION IN LANGUAGE LEARNING AND TEACHING, 2018, 12 (02) :137-151
[2]   Cognition and classroom quality as predictors of math achievement in the kindergarten year [J].
Blankson, A. Nayena ;
Blair, Clancy .
LEARNING AND INSTRUCTION, 2016, 41 :32-40
[3]   The effects of individual or group guidelines on the calibration accuracy and achievement of high school biology students [J].
Bol, Linda ;
Hacker, Douglas J. ;
Walck, Camilla C. ;
Nunnery, John A. .
CONTEMPORARY EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2012, 37 (04) :280-287
[4]   Self-monitoring support for learning to write [J].
Cho, Kwangsu ;
Cho, Moon-Heum ;
Hacker, Douglas J. .
INTERACTIVE LEARNING ENVIRONMENTS, 2010, 18 (02) :101-113
[5]   Cueing metacognition to improve researching and essay writing in a final year high school biology class [J].
Conner, L. N. .
RESEARCH IN SCIENCE EDUCATION, 2007, 37 (01) :1-16
[6]   COLLABORATION BETWEEN CHILDREN LEARNING TO WRITE - CAN NOVICES BE MASTERS [J].
DAIUTE, C ;
DALTON, B .
COGNITION AND INSTRUCTION, 1993, 10 (04) :281-333
[7]   Exploring the potential impact of reciprocal peer tutoring on higher education students' metacognitive knowledge and regulation [J].
De Backer, Liesje ;
Van Keer, Hilde ;
Valcke, Martin .
INSTRUCTIONAL SCIENCE, 2012, 40 (03) :559-588
[8]  
Field A., 2013, Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS Statistics, V4th
[9]   META-COGNITION AND COGNITIVE MONITORING - NEW AREA OF COGNITIVE-DEVELOPMENTAL INQUIRY [J].
FLAVELL, JH .
AMERICAN PSYCHOLOGIST, 1979, 34 (10) :906-911
[10]   A meta-analysis of writing instruction for adolescent students [J].
Graham, Steve ;
Perin, Dolores .
JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2007, 99 (03) :445-476