Cost talk: protocol for a stepped-wedge cluster randomized trial of an intervention helping patients and urologic surgeons discuss costs of care for slow-growing prostate cancer during shared decision-making

被引:8
|
作者
Politi, Mary C. [1 ]
Forcino, Rachel C. [2 ]
Parrish, Katelyn [1 ]
Durand, Marie-Anne [2 ,3 ]
O'Malley, A. James [2 ,4 ]
Elwyn, Glyn [2 ]
机构
[1] Washington Univ, Sch Med, Dept Surg, Div Publ Hlth Sci, 660 S Euclid Ave,Campus Box 8100, St Louis, MO 63110 USA
[2] Dartmouth Coll, Geisel Sch Med Dartmouth, Dartmouth Inst Hlth Policy & Clin Practice, Lebanon, NH USA
[3] Univ Toulouse III Paul Sabatier, Toulouse, France
[4] Dartmouth Coll, Geisel Sch Med Dartmouth, Dept Biomed Data Sci, Lebanon, NH USA
关键词
Stepped-wedge cluster randomized trial; Costs of care; Prostate cancer; Shared decision-making; Clinical communication; Financial toxicity; Cost conversations; FINANCIAL TOXICITY; REPORTED MEASURE; VALIDATION; COLLABORATE; ATTITUDES; SURVIVORS; BURDEN; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1186/s13063-021-05369-4
中图分类号
R-3 [医学研究方法]; R3 [基础医学];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
BackgroundCosts of care are important to patients making cancer treatment decisions, but clinicians often do not feel prepared to discuss treatment costs. We aim to (1) assess the impact of a conversation-based decision aid (Option Grid) containing cost information about slow-growing prostate cancer management options, combined with urologic surgeon training, on the frequency and quality of patient-urologic surgeon cost conversations, and (2) examine the impact of the decision aid and surgeon training on decision quality.MethodsWe will conduct a stepped-wedge cluster randomized trial in outpatient urology practices affiliated with a large academic medical center in the USA. We will randomize five urologic surgeons to four intervention sequences and enroll their patients with a first-time diagnosis of slow-growing prostate cancer independently at each period. Primary outcomes include frequency of cost conversations, initiator of cost conversations, and whether or not a referral is made to address costs. These outcomes will be collected by patient report (post-visit survey) and by observation (audio-recorded clinic visits) with consent. Other outcomes include the following: patient-reported decisional conflict post-visit and at 3-month follow-up, decision regret at 3-month follow-up, shared decision-making post-visit, communication post-visit, and financial toxicity post-visit and at 3-month follow-up; clinician-reported attitudes about shared decision-making before and after the study, and feasibility of sustained intervention use. We will use hierarchical regression analysis to assess patient-level outcomes, including urologic surgeon as a random effect to account for clustering of patient participants.DiscussionThis study evaluates a two-part intervention to improve cost discussions between urologic surgeons and patients when deciding how to manage slow-growing prostate cancer. Establishing the effectiveness of the strategy under study will allow for its replication in other clinical decision contexts.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.govNCT04397016. Registered on 21 May 2020
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 16 条
  • [1] Cost talk: protocol for a stepped-wedge cluster randomized trial of an intervention helping patients and urologic surgeons discuss costs of care for slow-growing prostate cancer during shared decision-making
    Mary C. Politi
    Rachel C. Forcino
    Katelyn Parrish
    Marie-Anne Durand
    A. James O’Malley
    Glyn Elwyn
    Trials, 22
  • [2] Evaluation of a program for routine implementation of shared decision-making in cancer care: study protocol of a stepped wedge cluster randomized trial
    Isabelle Scholl
    Pola Hahlweg
    Anja Lindig
    Carsten Bokemeyer
    Anja Coym
    Henning Hanken
    Volkmar Müller
    Ralf Smeets
    Isabell Witzel
    Levente Kriston
    Martin Härter
    Implementation Science, 13
  • [3] Evaluation of a program for routine implementation of shared decision-making in cancer care: study protocol of a stepped wedge cluster randomized trial
    Scholl, Isabelle
    Hahlweg, Pola
    Lindig, Anja
    Bokemeyer, Carsten
    Coym, Anja
    Hanken, Henning
    Mueller, Volkmar
    Smeets, Ralf
    Witzel, Isabell
    Kriston, Levente
    Haerter, Martin
    IMPLEMENTATION SCIENCE, 2018, 13
  • [4] Evaluation of a program for routine implementation of shared decision-making in cancer care: results of a stepped wedge cluster randomized trial
    Scholl, Isabelle
    Hahlweg, Pola
    Lindig, Anja
    Frerichs, Wiebke
    Zill, Jordis
    Cords, Hannah
    Bokemeyer, Carsten
    Coym, Anja
    Schmalfeldt, Barbara
    Smeets, Ralf
    Vollkommer, Tobias
    Witzel, Isabell
    Harter, Martin
    Kriston, Levente
    IMPLEMENTATION SCIENCE, 2021, 16 (01)
  • [5] Major influencing factors on routine implementation of shared decision-making in cancer care: qualitative process evaluation of a stepped-wedge cluster randomized trial
    Pola Hahlweg
    Anja Lindig
    Wiebke Frerichs
    Jördis Zill
    Henning Hanken
    Volkmar Müller
    Mia-Carlotta Peters
    Isabelle Scholl
    BMC Health Services Research, 23
  • [6] Major influencing factors on routine implementation of shared decision-making in cancer care: qualitative process evaluation of a stepped-wedge cluster randomized trial
    Hahlweg, Pola
    Lindig, Anja
    Frerichs, Wiebke
    Zill, Joerdis
    Hanken, Henning
    Mueller, Volkmar
    Peters, Mia-Carlotta
    Scholl, Isabelle
    BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2023, 23 (01)
  • [7] Evaluation of a program for routine implementation of shared decision-making in cancer care: results of a stepped wedge cluster randomized trial
    Isabelle Scholl
    Pola Hahlweg
    Anja Lindig
    Wiebke Frerichs
    Jördis Zill
    Hannah Cords
    Carsten Bokemeyer
    Anja Coym
    Barbara Schmalfeldt
    Ralf Smeets
    Tobias Vollkommer
    Isabell Witzel
    Martin Härter
    Levente Kriston
    Implementation Science, 16
  • [8] Shared Decision-Making Training for Home Care Teams to Engage Frail Older Adults and Caregivers in Housing Decisions: Stepped-Wedge Cluster Randomized Trial
    Adisso, Evehouenou Lionel
    Taljaard, Monica
    Stacey, Dawn
    Briere, Nathalie
    Zomahoun, Herve Tchala Vignon
    Durand, Pierre Jacob
    Rivest, Louis-Paul
    Legare, France
    JMIR AGING, 2022, 5 (03)
  • [9] The impact of adding cost information to a conversation aid to support shared decision making about low-risk prostate cancer treatment: Results of a stepped-wedge cluster randomised trial
    Politi, Mary C. C.
    Forcino, Rachel C. C.
    Parrish, Katelyn
    Durand, Marie-Anne
    O'Malley, A. James
    Moses, Rachel
    Cooksey, Krista
    Elwyn, Glyn
    HEALTH EXPECTATIONS, 2023, 26 (05) : 2023 - 2039
  • [10] Improving shared decision-making in vascular surgery by implementing decision support tools: study protocol for the stepped-wedge cluster-randomised OVIDIUS trial
    de Mik, S. M. L.
    Stubenrouch, F. E.
    Legemate, D. A.
    Balm, R.
    Ubbink, D. T.
    BMC MEDICAL INFORMATICS AND DECISION MAKING, 2020, 20 (01)