Amenable to reason: Aristotle's rhetoric and the moral psychology of practical ethics

被引:7
作者
London, AJ [1 ]
机构
[1] Carnegie Mellon Univ, Dept Philosophy, Pittsburgh, PA 15213 USA
[2] Carnegie Mellon Univ, Ctr Advancement Appl Eth, Pittsburgh, PA 15213 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1353/ken.2000.0028
中图分类号
B82 [伦理学(道德学)];
学科分类号
摘要
An Aristotelian conception of practical ethics can be derived from the account of practical reasoning that Aristotle articulates in his Rhetoric and this has important implications for the way we understand the nature and limits of practical ethics. An important feature of this conception of practical ethics is its responsiveness to the complex ways in which agents form and maintain moral commitments, and this has important implications for the debate concerning methods of ethics in applied ethics. In particular, this feature enables us to understand casuistry, narrative, and principlism as mutually supportive modes of moral inquiry, rather than divergent and mutually exclusive methods of ethics. As a result, an Aristotelian conception of practical ethics clears the conceptual common ground upon which practical ethicists can forge a stable and realistic self-understanding.
引用
收藏
页码:287 / 305
页数:19
相关论文
共 19 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1996, Rorty, P142
[2]   FALSE HOPES AND BEST DATA - CONSENT TO RESEARCH AND THE THERAPEUTIC MISCONCEPTION [J].
APPELBAUM, PS ;
ROTH, LH ;
LIDZ, CW ;
BENSON, P ;
WINSLADE, W .
HASTINGS CENTER REPORT, 1987, 17 (02) :20-24
[3]  
Arranz JP, 1997, AIP CONF PROC, P65, DOI 10.1063/1.51809
[4]   GETTING DOWN TO CASES - THE REVIVAL OF CASUISTRY IN BIOETHICS [J].
ARRAS, JD .
JOURNAL OF MEDICINE AND PHILOSOPHY, 1991, 16 (01) :29-51
[5]  
Barnes Jonathan., 1984, COMPLETE WORKS ARIST, V2
[6]  
Beauchamp TL, 1994, Principles of biomedical ethics
[7]  
BREWIN TB, 1982, LANCET, V2, P919
[8]  
BURELL D, 1977, KNOWLEDGE VALUE BELI, P111
[9]  
Burnyeat, 1996, ESSAYS ARISTOTLES RH, P88
[10]  
COOPER J, 1999, REASON EMOTION, P390