The Impact of Palliative Transurethral Resection of the Prostate on the Prognosis of Patients With Bladder Outlet Obstruction and Metastatic Prostate Cancer: A Population-Matched Study

被引:9
|
作者
Fang, Kun [1 ]
Song, Pan [1 ]
Zhang, Jiahe [2 ]
Yang, Luchen [1 ]
Liu, Peiwen [3 ]
Lu, Ni [3 ]
Dong, Qiang [1 ]
机构
[1] Sichuan Univ, Dept Urol, West China Hosp, Chengdu, Peoples R China
[2] Lanzhou Univ, Clin Med Coll 2, Lanzhou, Peoples R China
[3] Lanzhou Univ, Clin Med Coll 1, Lanzhou, Peoples R China
来源
FRONTIERS IN SURGERY | 2021年 / 8卷
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
metastatic prostate cancer; bladder outlet obstruction; TURP; survival; SEER; ABLATION;
D O I
10.3389/fsurg.2021.726534
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the survival outcomes of patients with bladder outlet obstruction (BOO) and metastatic prostate cancer (mPCa) after having a palliative transurethral resection of the prostate (pTURP) surgery.</p> Methods: We identified patients with mPCa between 2004 and 2016 in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. Patients who received pTURP and non-surgical therapy were identified. A propensity-score matching was introduced to balance the covariate. Kaplan-Meier analysis and COX regression were conducted to evaluate the overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) outcomes.</p> Results: A total of 36,003 patients were identified; 2,823 of them were in the pTURP group and 33,180 were in the non-surgical group. The survival curves of the overall cohort showed that the pTURP group was associated with worse outcomes in both OS (HR: 1.12, 95% CI: 1.07-1.18, p < 0.001) and CSS (HR: 1.08, 95% CI: 1.02-1.15, p = 0.004) compared with the non-surgical group. The mean survival time in the overall cohort of the pTURP group was shorter than the non-surgical group in both OS [35.13 +/- 1.53 vs. 40.44 +/- 0.59 months] and CSS [48.8 +/- 1.27 vs. 55.92 +/- 0.43 months]. In the matched cohort, the pTURP group had significantly lower survival curves for both OS (HR: 1.25, 95% CI: 1.16-1.35, p < 0.001) and CSS (HR: 1.23, 95% CI: 1.12-1.35, p < 0.001) than the non-surgical group. pTURP significantly reduced the survival months of the patients (36.49 +/- 0.94 vs. 45.52 +/- 1.23 months in OS and 50.1 +/- 1.49 vs. 61.28 +/- 1.74 months in CSS). In the multivariate COX analysis, pTURP increased the risk of overall mortality (HR: 1.19, 95% CI: 1.09-1.31, p < 0.001) and cancer-specific mortality CSS (HR: 1.23, 95% CI: 1.14-1.33, p < 0.001) compared with the non-surgical group.</p> Conclusions: For mPCa patients with BOO, pTURP could reduce OS and CSS while relieving the obstruction.</p>
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Diode Laser Ablation of Prostate and Channel Transurethral Resection of Prostate in Patients with Prostate Cancer and Bladder Outlet Obstruction Symptoms
    Javanmard, Babak
    Hadad, Amin Hasanzadeh
    Yaghoobi, Mohammad
    Lotfi, Behzad
    UROLOGY JOURNAL, 2014, 11 (04) : 1788 - 1791
  • [2] Palliative Transurethral Resection of the Prostate in Patients with Metastatic Prostate Cancer: A Prospective Study of 188 Patients
    Qu, Min
    Zhu, Feng
    Chen, Huan
    Lian, Bijun
    Jia, Zepeng
    Shi, Zhenkai
    Li, Jing
    Wang, Yan
    Sun, Yinghao
    Gao, Xu
    JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2019, 33 (07) : 570 - 575
  • [3] Simultaneous thulium laser resection of the prostate and transperineal prostate biopsy in clinically diagnosed metastatic prostate cancer with bladder outlet obstruction
    Shi, Youwei
    Cao, Tianyu
    Xu, Junhao
    Cui, Di
    Wang, Xiaohai
    Zhu, Yiping
    Ruan, Yuan
    Han, Bangmin
    Xia, Shujie
    Chen, Yuee
    Guo, Wenhuan
    Jing, Yifeng
    LASERS IN MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2023, 38 (01)
  • [4] Simultaneous thulium laser resection of the prostate and transperineal prostate biopsy in clinically diagnosed metastatic prostate cancer with bladder outlet obstruction
    Youwei Shi
    Tianyu Cao
    Junhao Xu
    Di Cui
    Xiaohai Wang
    Yiping Zhu
    Yuan Ruan
    Bangmin Han
    Shujie Xia
    Yuee Chen
    Wenhuan Guo
    Yifeng Jing
    Lasers in Medical Science, 38
  • [5] A Comparison of 120 W Laser Photoselective Vaporization versus Transurethral Resection of the Prostate for Bladder Outlet Obstruction by Prostate Cancer
    Altay, Bulent
    Erkurt, Bulent
    Kiremit, Murat Can
    Horuz, Rahim
    Guzelburc, Vahit
    Albayrak, Selami
    UROLOGIA INTERNATIONALIS, 2015, 94 (03) : 326 - 329
  • [6] Selective Transurethral Resection of the Prostate Combined with Transurethral Incision of the Bladder Neck for Bladder Outlet Obstruction in Patients with Small Volume Benign Prostate Hyperplasia (BPH): A Prospective Randomized Study
    Li, Xin
    Pan, Jin-hong
    Liu, Qi-gui
    He, Peng
    Song, Si-ji
    Jiang, Tao
    Zhou, Zhan-song
    PLOS ONE, 2013, 8 (05):
  • [7] Is there a correlation between the outcome of transurethral resection of prostate and preoperative degree of bladder outlet obstruction?
    Oh, Mi Mi
    Kim, Jin Wook
    Kim, Je Jong
    Moon, Du Geon
    ASIAN JOURNAL OF ANDROLOGY, 2012, 14 (04) : 556 - 559
  • [8] Clinical and Histopathological Characteristics of Prostate Cancer Patients Taken to Palliative Transurethral Prostate Resection
    Rojas-Manrique, Juan P.
    Ramirez Ramirez, Angie
    Becerra Mendez, Luis Miguel
    Ramos Ulloa, Jose G.
    Riveros, Carlos
    Varela Ramirez, Rodolfo
    CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2019, 11 (09)
  • [9] Contemporary outcomes of palliative transurethral resection of the prostate in patients with locally advanced prostate cancer
    Pelletier, Joanie
    Cyr, Sarah-Jeanne
    Julien, Anne-Sophie
    Fradet, Yves
    Lacombe, Louis
    Toren, Paul
    UROLOGIC ONCOLOGY-SEMINARS AND ORIGINAL INVESTIGATIONS, 2018, 36 (08) : 363.e7 - 363.e11
  • [10] Oncological effect of palliative transurethral resection of the prostate in patients with advanced prostate cancer: a propensity score matching study
    Choi, Se Young
    Ryu, Jeman
    You, Dalsan
    Jeong, In Gab
    Hong, Jun Hyuk
    Ahn, Hanjong
    Kim, Choung-Soo
    JOURNAL OF CANCER RESEARCH AND CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2018, 144 (04) : 751 - 758