Chemoembolization Endpoints: Effect on Survival Among Patients With Hepatocellular Carcinoma

被引:60
作者
Jin, Brian [1 ]
Wang, Dingxin [1 ]
Lewandowski, Robert J. [1 ]
Riaz, Ahsun [1 ]
Ryu, Robert K. [1 ]
Sato, Kent T. [1 ]
Larson, Andrew C. [1 ]
Salem, Riad [1 ]
Omary, Reed A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Northwestern Univ, Dept Radiol, Chicago, IL 60611 USA
关键词
embolization; endpoint; hepatocellular carcinoma; survival; transarterial chemoembolization; TRANSCATHETER INTRAARTERIAL PERFUSION; ENDOTHELIAL GROWTH-FACTOR; TRANSARTERIAL CHEMOEMBOLIZATION; ARTERIAL CHEMOEMBOLIZATION; LIVER-TRANSPLANTATION; MONITORING CHEMOEMBOLIZATION; HEPATIC MALIGNANCIES; EMBOLIZATION; TUMORS; CHEMOTHERAPY;
D O I
10.2214/AJR.10.4770
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study was to investigate the relation between angiographic embolic endpoints of transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) and the survival of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). MATERIALS AND METHODS. This study was a retrospective assessment of the cases of 105 patients with surgically unresectable HCC who underwent TACE. The cases were classified according to a previously established subjective angiographic chemoembolization endpoint scale. Only one patient had endpoint level I embolization and was excluded from all subsequent analysis. Survival was evaluated with Kaplan-Meier analysis. The Cox proportional hazards model was used to determine independent prognostic risk factors of survival. RESULTS. The overall median survival period was 21.1 months (95% CI, 15.9-26.4 months). Patients with embolization to subjective angiographic chemoembolization endpoint levels II and III were aggregated and had a significantly longer median survival period (25.6 months; 95% CI, 16.2-35.0 months) than patients with embolization to level IV (17.1 months; 95% CI, 13.3-20.9 months) (p = 0.035). The results of multivariate analysis indicated that all of the following factors were independent negative prognostic indicators of survival: subjective angiographic chemoembolization endpoint level IV (hazard ratio [HR], 2.49; 95% CI, 1.41-4.42; p = 0.002), European Cooperative Oncology Group performance status greater than 0 (HR, 1.97; 95% CI, 1.15-3.37; p = 0.013), American Joint Committee on Cancer stage III or IV (HR, 2.42; 95% CI, 1.27-4.60; p = 0.007), and Child-Pugh class B (HR, 1.94; 95% CI, 1.09-3.46; p = 0.025). CONCLUSION. Embolization to an intermediate, substasis endpoint (subjective angiographic chemoembolization endpoint levels II and III) during TACE improves survival compared with embolization to a higher, stasis endpoint (level IV). Interventional oncologists should consider aiming for these intermediate, substasis angiographic endpoints during TACE.
引用
收藏
页码:919 / 928
页数:10
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2002, AJCC CANC STAGING HD
[2]   Society of Interventional Radiology Position Statement on Chemoembolization of Hepatic Malignancies (Reprinted from J Vasc Interv Radiol vol 17, pg 217-223, 2006) [J].
Brown, Daniel B. ;
Geschwind, Jean-Francois H. ;
Soulen, Michael C. ;
Millward, Steven F. ;
Sacks, David .
JOURNAL OF VASCULAR AND INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY, 2009, 20 (07) :S317-S323
[3]   Hepatic arterial chemoembolization for hepatocellular carcinoma: Comparison of survival rates with different embolic agents [J].
Brown, DB ;
Pilgram, TK ;
Darcy, MD ;
Fundakowski, CE ;
Lisker-Melman, M ;
Chapman, WC ;
Crippin, JS .
JOURNAL OF VASCULAR AND INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY, 2005, 16 (12) :1661-1666
[4]   Clinical management of hepatocellular carcinoma.: Conclusions of the Barcelona-2000 EASL Conference [J].
Bruix, J ;
Sherman, M ;
Llovet, JM ;
Beaugrand, M ;
Lencioni, R ;
Burroughs, AK ;
Christensen, E ;
Pagliaro, L ;
Colombo, M ;
Rodés, J .
JOURNAL OF HEPATOLOGY, 2001, 35 (03) :421-430
[5]   Prognostic prediction and treatment strategy in hepatocellular carcinoma [J].
Bruix, J ;
Llovet, JM .
HEPATOLOGY, 2002, 35 (03) :519-524
[6]   EMBOLOTHERAPY - AGENTS, CLINICAL-APPLICATIONS, AND TECHNIQUES [J].
COLDWELL, DM ;
STOKES, KR ;
YAKES, WF .
RADIOGRAPHICS, 1994, 14 (03) :623-643
[7]   Impact of pretransplantation transarterial chemoembolization on survival and recurrence after liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma [J].
Decaens, T ;
Roudot-Thoraval, F ;
Bresson-Hadni, S ;
Meyer, C ;
Gugenheim, J ;
Durand, F ;
Bernard, PH ;
Boillot, O ;
Boudjema, K ;
Calmus, Y ;
Hardwigsen, J ;
Ducerf, C ;
Pageaux, GP ;
Dharancy, S ;
Chazouilleres, O ;
Dhumeaux, D ;
Cherqui, D ;
Duvoux, C .
LIVER TRANSPLANTATION, 2005, 11 (07) :767-775
[8]   Hepatocellular carcinoma: Epidemiology and molecular carcinogenesis [J].
El-Serag, Hashem B. ;
Rudolph, Lenhard .
GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2007, 132 (07) :2557-2576
[9]   Four-dimensional Transcatheter Intraarterial Perfusion MR Imaging for Monitoring Chemoembolization of Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Preliminary Results [J].
Gaba, Ron C. ;
Wang, Dingxin ;
Lewandowski, Robert J. ;
Ryu, Robert K. ;
Sato, Kent T. ;
Kulik, Laura M. ;
Mulcahy, Mary F. ;
Larson, Andrew C. ;
Salem, Riad ;
Omary, Reed A. .
JOURNAL OF VASCULAR AND INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY, 2008, 19 (11) :1589-1595
[10]   Transcatheter arterial chemoembolization of liver tumors: Effects of embolization protocol on injectable volume of chemotherapy and subsequent arterial patency [J].
Geschwind, JFH ;
Ramsey, DE ;
Cleffken, B ;
van der Wal, BCH ;
Kobeiter, H ;
Juluru, K ;
Hartnell, GG ;
Choti, MA .
CARDIOVASCULAR AND INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY, 2003, 26 (02) :111-117