Comparison of two breeding strategies by computer simulation

被引:62
|
作者
Wang, JK
van Ginkel, M
Podlich, D
Ye, GY
Trethowan, R
Pfeiffer, W
DeLacy, IH
Cooper, M
Rajaram, S
机构
[1] CIMMYT, Wheat Program, Mexico City 06600, DF, Mexico
[2] Pioneer HiBred Int Inc, Johnston, IA 50131 USA
[3] Univ Queensland, Sch Land & Food Sci, Brisbane, Qld 4072, Australia
关键词
D O I
10.2135/cropsci2003.1764
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
Breeding strategies used by plant breeders are many and varied, making it difficult to compare efficiencies of different breeding strategies through field experimentation. The objective of this paper was to compare, through computer simulation, two widely used breeding strategies, the modified pedigree/bulk selection method (MODPED) and the selected bulk selection method (SELBLK), in CIMMYT's wheat breeding program. The genetic models developed accounted for epistasis, pleiotropy, and genotype X environment (GE) interaction. The simulation experiment comprised the same 1000 crosses, developed from 200 parents, for both breeding strategies. A total of 258 advanced lines remained following 10 generations of selection. The two strategies were each applied 500 times on 12 GE systems. Findings indicated that genetic gain from SELBLK was on average 3.9% higher than that from MODPED, and genetic gain adjusted by target genotypes from SELBLK was on average 3.3% higher than MODPED for a wide range of genetic models. A greater proportion of crosses were retained (25% more) by means of SELBLK compared with MODPED, and from F1 to F8, SELBLK required one third less land than MODPED and produced fewer families (40% of the number for MODPED). For the genetic models considered in our study, computer simulations showed that the SELBLK method resulted in slightly greater genetic gain and significant improvements in cost effectiveness.
引用
收藏
页码:1764 / 1773
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Comparison of Two Perennial Grass Breeding Systems with Switchgrass
    Vogel, K. P.
    CROP SCIENCE, 2013, 53 (03) : 863 - 870
  • [42] COMPARISON OF TWO STRUCTURE AND MOTION STRATEGIES
    Roncella, R.
    Re, C.
    Forlani, G.
    4TH ISPRS INTERNATIONAL WORKSHOP 3D-ARCH 2011: 3D VIRTUAL RECONSTRUCTION AND VISUALIZATION OF COMPLEX ARCHITECTURES, 2011, 38-5 (W16): : 343 - 350
  • [43] Comparison of two pavement rehabilitation strategies
    Chen, DH
    Hugo, F
    JOURNAL OF TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING, 2001, 127 (01) : 47 - 58
  • [44] Computer simulation of linkage of two ring chains
    Xiong, Zhimin
    Han, Charles C.
    Liao, Qi
    JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL PHYSICS, 2012, 136 (13):
  • [45] Comparison of parallelization strategies for simulation of aerodynamics problem
    See, CWS
    3RD INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON HIGH PERFORMANCE COMPUTING, PROCEEDINGS, 1996, : 10 - 15
  • [46] A quantitative comparison of simulation strategies for mortality projection
    Li, Jackie
    ANNALS OF ACTUARIAL SCIENCE, 2014, 8 (02) : 281 - 297
  • [47] Comparison of different coordination strategies for the RoboCupRescue simulation
    Paquet, S
    Bernier, N
    Chaib-draa, B
    INNOVATIONS IN APPLIED ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, 2004, 3029 : 987 - 996
  • [48] Genomic selection in wheat: optimum allocation of test resources and comparison of breeding strategies for line and hybrid breeding
    Longin, C. Friedrich H.
    Mi, Xuefei
    Wurschum, Tobias
    THEORETICAL AND APPLIED GENETICS, 2015, 128 (07) : 1297 - 1306
  • [49] Evaluating dialogue strategies under communication errors using computer-to-computer simulation
    Watanabe, T
    Araki, M
    Doshita, S
    IEICE TRANSACTIONS ON INFORMATION AND SYSTEMS, 1998, E81D (09): : 1025 - 1033
  • [50] Genomic Improvement of Disease Resistance Using Two Breeding Strategies in a Population of Penaeus Vannamei (Pacific White shrimp): a Simulation Study
    Ampofo, Issabelle
    Kobayashi, Julian
    Miller, Clara
    O'Neil, Shauneen
    Dhar, Arun
    Fragomeni, Breno O.
    JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2023, 101