Administrative Burden: Learning, Psychological, and Compliance Costs in Citizen-State Interactions

被引:559
作者
Moynihan, Donald [1 ]
Herd, Pamela [1 ]
Harvey, Hope [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Wisconsin, Madison, WI 53706 USA
[2] Harvard Univ, Cambridge, MA 02138 USA
关键词
TAKE-UP; WELFARE; POLICY; PARTICIPATION; HEALTH; MEDICAID; REFORM; ORGANIZATIONS; REQUIREMENTS; ELIGIBILITY;
D O I
10.1093/jopart/muu009
中图分类号
D0 [政治学、政治理论];
学科分类号
0302 ; 030201 ;
摘要
This article offers two theoretical contributions. First, we develop the concept of administrative burden as an important variable in understanding how citizens experience the state. Administrative burden is conceptualized as a function of learning, psychological, and compliance costs that citizens experience in their interactions with government. Second, we argue that administrative burden is a venue of politics, that is, the level of administrative burden placed on an individual, as well as the distribution of burden between the state and the individual, will often be a function of deliberate political choice rather than simply a product of historical accident or neglect. The opaque nature of administrative burdens may facilitate their use as forms of "hidden politics," where significant policy changes occur without broad political consideration. We illustrate this argument via an analysis of the evolution of Medicaid policies in the state of Wisconsin. Across three Governorships, the level of burden evolved in ways consistent with the differing political philosophies of each Governor, with federal actors playing a secondary but important role in shaping burden in this intergovernmental program. We conclude by sketching a research agenda centered on administrative burden.
引用
收藏
页码:43 / 69
页数:27
相关论文
共 84 条
[41]   Privatizing risk without privatizing the welfare state: The hidden politics of social policy retrenchment in the United States [J].
Hacker, JS .
AMERICAN POLITICAL SCIENCE REVIEW, 2004, 98 (02) :243-260
[42]   Election Administration Reform and State Choice: Voter Identification Requirements and HAVA [J].
Hale, Kathleen ;
McNeal, Ramona .
POLICY STUDIES JOURNAL, 2010, 38 (02) :281-302
[43]   Has the food stamp program become more accessible? Impacts of recent changes in reporting requirements and asset eligibility limits [J].
Hanratty, MJ .
JOURNAL OF POLICY ANALYSIS AND MANAGEMENT, 2006, 25 (03) :603-621
[44]   A State of Agents? Sharpening the Debate and Evidence over the Extent and Impact of the Transformation of Governance [J].
Heinrich, Carolyn J. ;
Lynn, Laurence E., Jr. ;
Milward, H. Brinton .
JOURNAL OF PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION RESEARCH AND THEORY, 2010, 20 :I3-I19
[45]   Shifting Administrative Burden to the State: The Case of Medicaid Take-Up [J].
Herd, Pamela ;
DeLeire, Thomas ;
Harvey, Hope ;
Moynihan, Donald P. .
PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION REVIEW, 2013, 73 :S69-S81
[46]  
Hernanz V., 2004, TAKE UP WELFARE BENE, V17
[47]   SOCIAL BASES OF WELFARE STIGMA [J].
HORAN, PM ;
AUSTIN, PL .
SOCIAL PROBLEMS, 1974, 21 (05) :648-657
[48]   For-profit welfare: Contracts, conflicts, and the performance paradox [J].
Johnson Dias, Janice ;
Maynard-Moody, Steven .
JOURNAL OF PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION RESEARCH AND THEORY, 2007, 17 (02) :189-211
[49]   Short recertification periods in the US Food Stamp Program [J].
Kabbani, NS ;
Wilde, PE .
JOURNAL OF HUMAN RESOURCES, 2003, 38 :1112-1138
[50]  
Katz M., 1986, SHADOW POORHOUSE, VRevised