Assessment of TOPKAPI-X Applicability for Flood Events Simulation in Two Small Catchments in Saxony

被引:3
作者
Al Janabi, Firas [1 ]
Ongdas, Nurlan [2 ]
Bernhofer, Christian [3 ]
Silva, Julian David Reyes [1 ]
Benisch, Jakob [1 ]
Krebs, Peter [1 ]
机构
[1] Tech Univ Dresden, Fac Environm Sci, Dept Hydrosci, Inst Urban Water Management, D-01062 Dresden, Germany
[2] ON Oekohydroprojekt, Aiteke Bi 120400, Kazakhstan
[3] Tech Univ Dresden, Fac Environm Sci, Inst Hydrol & Meteorol, Dept Hydrosci,Chair Meteorol, D-01737 Tharandt, Germany
关键词
TOPKAPI-X; hydrological modeling; high flow events; Wernersbach; Wesenitz; MIKE-SHE; PERFORMANCE EVALUATION; HYDROLOGICAL MODELS; DISTRIBUTED MODEL; RUNOFF; RAINFALL; BASIN; WATER; PRECIPITATION; TOPMODEL;
D O I
10.3390/hydrology8030109
中图分类号
TV21 [水资源调查与水利规划];
学科分类号
081501 ;
摘要
Numerical simulations of rainfall-runoff processes are useful tools for understanding hydrological processes and performing impact assessment studies. The advancements in computer technology and data availability have assisted their rapid development and wide use. This project aims to evaluate the applicability of a physically based, fully distributed rainfall-runoff model TOPKAPI-X for the simulation of flood events in two small watersheds of Saxony, Germany. The results indicate that the model was calibrated well for 4.88 km(2) Wernersbach catchment (NSE 0.89), whereas 276 km(2) Wesenitz catchment calibration was only satisfactory (NSE 0.7). The addition of the second soil layer improved the model's performance in comparison to the simulations with only one soil layer for Wernersbach (NSE increase from 0.83 to 0.89). During the validation process, the model showed a variable performance. The best performance was achieved for Wernersbach for the year with the highest runoff (NSE 0.95) in the last decade. The lowest performance for the Wernersbach and Wesenitz catchments was 0.64 for both. The reasons for the model's low performance in some years are discussed, and include: (i) input data quality and data insufficiency, (ii) methods used within the simulations (interpolation, ETP estimation, etc.), and (iii) assumptions made during the calibration (manual calibration, parameter selection, etc.).
引用
收藏
页数:25
相关论文
共 113 条
  • [1] Estimation of the ARNO model baseflow parameters using daily streamflow data
    Abdulla, FA
    Lettenmaier, DP
    Liang, X
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 1999, 222 (1-4) : 37 - 54
  • [2] A hydrometeorological model intercomparison as a tool to quantify the forecast uncertainty in a medium size basin
    Amengual, A.
    Diomede, T.
    Marsigli, C.
    Martin, A.
    Morgillo, A.
    Romero, R.
    Papetti, P.
    Alonso, S.
    [J]. NATURAL HAZARDS AND EARTH SYSTEM SCIENCES, 2008, 8 (04) : 819 - 838
  • [3] Spatial lumping of a distributed rainfall-sediment-runoff model and its effective lumping scale
    Apip
    Sayama, Takahiro
    Tachikawa, Yasuto
    Takara, Kaoru
    [J]. HYDROLOGICAL PROCESSES, 2012, 26 (06) : 855 - 871
  • [4] A GPU-Accelerated Shallow-Water Scheme for Surface Runoff Simulations
    Aureli, Francesca
    Prost, Federico
    Vacondio, Renato
    Dazzi, Susanna
    Ferrari, Alessia
    [J]. WATER, 2020, 12 (03)
  • [5] Application of TOPNET in the distributed model intercomparison project
    Bandaragoda, C
    Tarboton, DG
    Woods, R
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 2004, 298 (1-4) : 178 - 201
  • [6] Spatial distribution of rainfall in Indian Himalayas - A case study of Uttarakhand region
    Basistha, Ashoke
    Arya, D. S.
    Goel, N. K.
    [J]. WATER RESOURCES MANAGEMENT, 2008, 22 (10) : 1325 - 1346
  • [7] Bertoldi G., 2004, GEOTOP HYDR BAL MOD
  • [8] Beven K, 1997, HYDROL PROCESS, V11, P1069
  • [9] A dynamic TOPMODEL
    Beven, K
    Freer, J
    [J]. HYDROLOGICAL PROCESSES, 2001, 15 (10) : 1993 - 2011
  • [10] Beven K., 1995, Computer models of watershed hydrology., P627