Methodological aspects to be considered when measuring the approximate number system (ANS) - a research review

被引:72
作者
Dietrich, Julia F. [1 ,2 ]
Huber, Stefan [1 ]
Nuerk, Hans-Christoph [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Knowledge Media Res Ctr, Tubingen, Germany
[2] Univ Tubingen, Dept Psychol, D-72076 Tubingen, Germany
[3] Univ Tubingen, LEAD Grad Sch, D-72076 Tubingen, Germany
关键词
approximate number system; measuring; tasks; reliability; validity; stimuli; visual control; presentation duration; INDIVIDUAL-DIFFERENCES; OPERATIONAL MOMENTUM; MATHEMATICS ABILITY; NONSYMBOLIC NUMBER; NEURAL BASIS; ACUITY; SENSE; REPRESENTATIONS; DISCRIMINATION; ACHIEVEMENT;
D O I
10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00295
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
According to a dominant view, the approximate number system (ANS) is the foundation of symbolic math abilities. Due to the importance of math abilities for education and career, a lot of research focuses on the investigation of the ANS and its relationship with math performance. However, the results are inconsistent. This might be caused by studies differing greatly regarding the operationalization of the ANS (i.e., tasks, dependent variables). Moreover, many methodological aspects vary from one study to the next. In the present review, we discuss commonly used ANS tasks and dependent variables regarding their theoretical foundation and psychometric features. We argue that the inconsistent findings concerning the relationship between ANS acuity and math performance may be partially explained by differences in reliability. Furthermore, this review summarizes methodological aspects of ANS tasks having important impacts on the results, including stimulus range, visual controls, presentation duration of the stimuli and feedback. Based on this review, we give methodological recommendations on how to assess the ANS most reliably and most validly. All important methodological aspects to be considered when designing an ANS task or comparing results of different studies are summarized in two practical checklists.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 78 条
[11]   Are the neural correlates of subitizing and estimation dissociable? An fNIRS investigation [J].
Cutini, Simone ;
Scatturin, Pietro ;
Moro, Sara Basso ;
Zorzi, Marco .
NEUROIMAGE, 2014, 85 :391-399
[12]   How do symbolic and non-symbolic numerical magnitude processing skills relate to individual differences in children's mathematical skills? A review of evidence from brain and behavior [J].
De Smedt, Bert ;
Noel, Marie-Pascale ;
Gilmore, Camilla ;
Ansari, Daniel .
TRENDS IN NEUROSCIENCE AND EDUCATION, 2013, 2 (02) :48-55
[13]   Intelligence and educational achievement [J].
Deary, Ian J. ;
Strand, Steve ;
Smith, Pauline ;
Fernandes, Cres .
INTELLIGENCE, 2007, 35 (01) :13-21
[14]   The neural basis of the Weber-Fechner law: a logarithmic mental number [J].
Dehaene, S .
TRENDS IN COGNITIVE SCIENCES, 2003, 7 (04) :145-147
[15]   Precis of the number sense [J].
Dehaene, S .
MIND & LANGUAGE, 2001, 16 (01) :16-36
[16]   DEVELOPMENT OF ELEMENTARY NUMERICAL ABILITIES - A NEURONAL MODEL [J].
DEHAENE, S ;
CHANGEUX, JP .
JOURNAL OF COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE, 1993, 5 (04) :390-407
[17]   Origins of Mathematical Intuitions The Case of Arithmetic [J].
Dehaene, Stanislas .
YEAR IN COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE 2009, 2009, 1156 :232-259
[18]   Malleability of the approximate number system: effects of feedback and training [J].
DeWind, Nicholas K. ;
Brannon, Elizabeth M. .
FRONTIERS IN HUMAN NEUROSCIENCE, 2012, 6
[19]   Relations of different types of numerical magnitude representations to each other and to mathematics achievement [J].
Fazio, Lisa K. ;
Bailey, Drew H. ;
Thompson, Clarissa A. ;
Siegler, Robert S. .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL CHILD PSYCHOLOGY, 2014, 123 :53-72
[20]   Core systems of number [J].
Feigenson, L ;
Dehaene, S ;
Spelke, E .
TRENDS IN COGNITIVE SCIENCES, 2004, 8 (07) :307-314