Methodological aspects to be considered when measuring the approximate number system (ANS) - a research review

被引:72
作者
Dietrich, Julia F. [1 ,2 ]
Huber, Stefan [1 ]
Nuerk, Hans-Christoph [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Knowledge Media Res Ctr, Tubingen, Germany
[2] Univ Tubingen, Dept Psychol, D-72076 Tubingen, Germany
[3] Univ Tubingen, LEAD Grad Sch, D-72076 Tubingen, Germany
关键词
approximate number system; measuring; tasks; reliability; validity; stimuli; visual control; presentation duration; INDIVIDUAL-DIFFERENCES; OPERATIONAL MOMENTUM; MATHEMATICS ABILITY; NONSYMBOLIC NUMBER; NEURAL BASIS; ACUITY; SENSE; REPRESENTATIONS; DISCRIMINATION; ACHIEVEMENT;
D O I
10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00295
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
According to a dominant view, the approximate number system (ANS) is the foundation of symbolic math abilities. Due to the importance of math abilities for education and career, a lot of research focuses on the investigation of the ANS and its relationship with math performance. However, the results are inconsistent. This might be caused by studies differing greatly regarding the operationalization of the ANS (i.e., tasks, dependent variables). Moreover, many methodological aspects vary from one study to the next. In the present review, we discuss commonly used ANS tasks and dependent variables regarding their theoretical foundation and psychometric features. We argue that the inconsistent findings concerning the relationship between ANS acuity and math performance may be partially explained by differences in reliability. Furthermore, this review summarizes methodological aspects of ANS tasks having important impacts on the results, including stimulus range, visual controls, presentation duration of the stimuli and feedback. Based on this review, we give methodological recommendations on how to assess the ANS most reliably and most validly. All important methodological aspects to be considered when designing an ANS task or comparing results of different studies are summarized in two practical checklists.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 78 条
[1]   What basic number processing measures in kindergarten explain unique variability in first-grade arithmetic proficiency? [J].
Bartelet, Dimona ;
Vaessen, Anniek ;
Blomert, Leo ;
Ansari, Daniel .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL CHILD PSYCHOLOGY, 2014, 117 :12-28
[2]   The approximate number system and its relation to early math achievement: Evidence from the preschool years [J].
Bonny, Justin W. ;
Lourenco, Stella F. .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL CHILD PSYCHOLOGY, 2013, 114 (03) :375-388
[3]   Numerical subtraction in the pigeon: Evidence for a linear subjective number scale [J].
Brannon, EM ;
Wusthoff, CJ ;
Gallistel, CR ;
Gibbon, J .
PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 2001, 12 (03) :238-243
[4]   COMPARISONS OF DIGITS AND DOT PATTERNS [J].
BUCKLEY, PB ;
GILLMAN, CB .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1974, 103 (06) :1131-1136
[5]   Executive functioning as a predictor of children's mathematics ability: Inhibition, switching, and working memory [J].
Bull, R ;
Scerif, G .
DEVELOPMENTAL NEUROPSYCHOLOGY, 2001, 19 (03) :273-293
[6]  
Bynner J., 2006, Does numeracy matter more
[7]   Beyond the number domain [J].
Cantlon, Jessica F. ;
Platt, Michael L. ;
Brannon, Elizabeth M. .
TRENDS IN COGNITIVE SCIENCES, 2009, 13 (02) :83-91
[8]   Number skills are maintained in healthy ageing [J].
Cappelletti, Marinella ;
Didino, Daniele ;
Stoianov, Ivilin ;
Zorzi, Marco .
COGNITIVE PSYCHOLOGY, 2014, 69 :25-45
[9]   Impact of High Mathematics Education on the Number Sense [J].
Castronovo, Julie ;
Goebel, Silke M. .
PLOS ONE, 2012, 7 (04) :e33832
[10]   Association between individual differences in non-symbolic number acuity and math performance: A meta-analysis [J].
Chen, Qixuan ;
Li, Jingguang .
ACTA PSYCHOLOGICA, 2014, 148 :163-172