Methodological aspects to be considered when measuring the approximate number system (ANS) - a research review

被引:67
|
作者
Dietrich, Julia F. [1 ,2 ]
Huber, Stefan [1 ]
Nuerk, Hans-Christoph [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Knowledge Media Res Ctr, Tubingen, Germany
[2] Univ Tubingen, Dept Psychol, D-72076 Tubingen, Germany
[3] Univ Tubingen, LEAD Grad Sch, D-72076 Tubingen, Germany
来源
FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY | 2015年 / 6卷
关键词
approximate number system; measuring; tasks; reliability; validity; stimuli; visual control; presentation duration; INDIVIDUAL-DIFFERENCES; OPERATIONAL MOMENTUM; MATHEMATICS ABILITY; NONSYMBOLIC NUMBER; NEURAL BASIS; ACUITY; SENSE; REPRESENTATIONS; DISCRIMINATION; ACHIEVEMENT;
D O I
10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00295
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
According to a dominant view, the approximate number system (ANS) is the foundation of symbolic math abilities. Due to the importance of math abilities for education and career, a lot of research focuses on the investigation of the ANS and its relationship with math performance. However, the results are inconsistent. This might be caused by studies differing greatly regarding the operationalization of the ANS (i.e., tasks, dependent variables). Moreover, many methodological aspects vary from one study to the next. In the present review, we discuss commonly used ANS tasks and dependent variables regarding their theoretical foundation and psychometric features. We argue that the inconsistent findings concerning the relationship between ANS acuity and math performance may be partially explained by differences in reliability. Furthermore, this review summarizes methodological aspects of ANS tasks having important impacts on the results, including stimulus range, visual controls, presentation duration of the stimuli and feedback. Based on this review, we give methodological recommendations on how to assess the ANS most reliably and most validly. All important methodological aspects to be considered when designing an ANS task or comparing results of different studies are summarized in two practical checklists.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 7 条
  • [1] Measuring the acuity of the approximate number system in young children
    Krajcsi, Attila
    Chesney, Dana
    Cipora, Krzysztof
    Coolen, Ilse
    Gilmore, Camilla
    Inglis, Matthew
    Libertus, Melissa
    Nuerk, Hans-Christoph
    Simms, Victoria
    Reynvoet, Bert
    DEVELOPMENTAL REVIEW, 2024, 72
  • [2] Measuring the approximate number system
    Gilmore, Camilla
    Attridge, Nina
    Inglis, Matthew
    QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2011, 64 (11) : 2099 - 2109
  • [3] Measuring acuity of the approximate number system reliably and validly: the evaluation of an adaptive test procedure
    Lindskog, Marcus
    Winman, Anders
    Juslin, Peter
    Poom, Leo
    FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2013, 4
  • [4] Measuring the approximate number system in children: Exploring the relationships among different tasks
    Gilmore, Camilla
    Attridge, Nina
    De Smedt, Bert
    Inglis, Matthew
    LEARNING AND INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES, 2014, 29 : 50 - 58
  • [5] Sensory-integration system rather than approximate number system underlies numerosity processing: A critical review
    Gebuis, Titia
    Kadosh, Roi Cohen
    Gevers, Wim
    ACTA PSYCHOLOGICA, 2016, 171 : 17 - 35
  • [6] New Evidence on Causal Relationship between Approximate Number System (ANS) Acuity and Arithmetic Ability in Elementary-School Students: A Longitudinal Cross-Lagged Analysis
    He, Yunfeng
    Zhou, Xinlin
    Shi, Dexin
    Song, Hairong
    Zhang, Hui
    Shi, Jiannong
    FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2016, 7
  • [7] The approximate number system and mathematics achievement: it's complicated. A thorough investigation of different ANS measures and executive functions in mathematics achievement in children
    Coolen, Ilse E. J. I.
    Riggs, Kevin J.
    Bugler, Myfanwy
    Castronovo, Julie
    JOURNAL OF COGNITIVE PSYCHOLOGY, 2022, 34 (06) : 796 - 818