The multitudes of bioeconomies: A systematic review of stakeholders' bioeconomy perceptions

被引:36
作者
Dieken, Sophia [1 ]
Dallendoerfer, Mirko [1 ]
Henseleit, Meike [1 ]
Siekmann, Florian [1 ]
Venghaus, Sandra [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Forschungszentrum Julich, Inst Energy & Climate Res Syst Anal & Technol Eva, Wilhelm Johnen Str, D-52428 Julich, Germany
[2] Rhein Westfal TH Aachen, Sch Business & Econ, D-52072 Aachen, Germany
关键词
Bioeconomy; Stakeholders; Perceptions; Bioeconomy vision; Stakeholder preferences; CIRCULAR ECONOMY; RESPONSIBILITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.spc.2021.04.006
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
'Bioeconomy', the use of sustainably produced biomass and the application of biotechnologies, serves as an umbrella term for highly diverse interests and perspectives by a large number of stakeholders involved and by broader society. Consequently, research on stakeholder perceptions of the bioeconomy has increased, investigating questions of, e.g., underlying normative assumptions, political legitimacy and participation, or consumer acceptance. In order to identify the current state of research and avenues for further research, we conduct a systematic literature review of stakeholders' bioeconomy perceptions. To this aim, we developed a mixed-methods approach based on the inductive coding of research articles. The review finds an overall dominance of biotechnology and resource themes, and a strong focus on research, policy and industry stakeholders. A lack of ecological and societal concerns, against the background of few research works on actors from civil society, suggests a gap between the bioeconomy as a sustainability concept and the perceptions of stakeholders involved. Overall, stronger consideration of societal stakeholders is required both in research and policy. (C) 2021 Institution of Chemical Engineers. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1703 / 1717
页数:15
相关论文
共 66 条
[1]   (Re-)producing bioassemblages: positionalities of regional bioeconomy development in Finland [J].
Albrecht, Moritz .
LOCAL ENVIRONMENT, 2019, 24 (04) :342-357
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2023, Maritime Communication Solutions, DOI DOI 10.1007/S11837-012-0378-1
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2009, BIOEC 2030 DES POL A, DOI DOI 10.1787/9789264056886-EN
[4]  
Atwell RC, 2009, ECOL SOC, V14
[5]  
Birch K., 2010, Sustainability, V2, P2898, DOI DOI 10.3390/SU2092898
[6]   Emergent Imaginaries and Fragmented Policy Frameworks in the Canadian Bio-Economy [J].
Birch, Kean .
SUSTAINABILITY, 2016, 8 (10)
[7]   Knowledge, place, and power: geographies of value in the bioeconomy [J].
Birch, Kean .
NEW GENETICS AND SOCIETY, 2012, 31 (02) :183-201
[8]   The rise of flex crops and commodities: implications for research [J].
Borras, Saturnino M., Jr. ;
Franco, Jennifer C. ;
Isakson, S. Ryan ;
Levidow, Les ;
Vervest, Pietje .
JOURNAL OF PEASANT STUDIES, 2016, 43 (01) :93-115
[9]  
Bressanelli G., 2020, SUSTAIN PROD CONSUM
[10]   Contradictions of value: between use and exchange in cord blood bioeconomy [J].
Brown, Nik .
SOCIOLOGY OF HEALTH & ILLNESS, 2013, 35 (01) :97-112