Space complexity of random formulae in resolution

被引:37
作者
Ben-Sasson, E [1 ]
Galesi, N
机构
[1] Hebrew Univ Jerusalem, Inst Comp Sci, IL-91905 Jerusalem, Israel
[2] Univ Politecn Cataluna, Dept Llenguatges & Sistemes Informat, ES-08034 Barcelona, Spain
关键词
D O I
10.1002/rsa.10089
中图分类号
TP31 [计算机软件];
学科分类号
081202 ; 0835 ;
摘要
We study the space complexity of refuting unsatisfiable random k-CNFs in the Resolution proof system. We prove that for Delta greater than or equal to 1 and any epsilon > 0, with high probability a random k-CNF over n variables and Deltan clauses requires resolution clause space of Omega(n/Delta(1+epsilon)). For constant A, this gives us linear, optimal, lower bounds on the clause space. One consequence of this lower bound is the first lower bound for size of treelike resolution refutations of random 3-CNFs with clause density Delta much greater than rootn. This bound is nearly tight. Specifically, we show that with high probability, a random 3-CNF with Deltan clauses requires treelike refutation size of exp(Omega(n/Delta(1+epsilon))), for any epsilon > 0. Our space lower bound is the consequence of three main contributions: (1) We introduce a 2-player Matching Game on bipartite graphs G to prove that there are no perfect matchings in G. (2) We reduce lower bounds for the clause space of a formula F in Resolution to lower bounds for the complexity of the game played on the bipartite graph G(F) associated with F. (3) We prove that the complexity of the game is large whenever G is an expander graph. Finally, a simple probabilistic analysis shows that for a random formula F, with high probability G(F) is an expander. We also extend our result to the case of G-PHP, a generalization of the Pigeonhole principle based on bipartite graphs G. (C) 2003 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:92 / 109
页数:18
相关论文
共 15 条
[1]  
Achlioptas D., 2000, Proceedings of the Thirty Second Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing, P28, DOI 10.1145/335305.335309
[2]  
Alekhnovich M., 2000, Proceedings of the Thirty Second Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing, P358, DOI 10.1145/335305.335347
[3]   Simplified and improved resolution lower bounds [J].
Beame, P ;
Pitassi, T .
37TH ANNUAL SYMPOSIUM ON FOUNDATIONS OF COMPUTER SCIENCE, PROCEEDINGS, 1996, :274-282
[4]  
Beame P., 1998, Proceedings of the Thirtieth Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing, P561, DOI 10.1145/276698.276870
[5]  
Ben-Sasson E., 1999, Proceedings of the Thirty-First Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing, P517, DOI 10.1145/301250.301392
[6]   MANY HARD EXAMPLES FOR RESOLUTION [J].
CHVATAL, V ;
SZEMEREDI, E .
JOURNAL OF THE ACM, 1988, 35 (04) :759-768
[7]   RELATIVE EFFICIENCY OF PROPOSITIONAL PROOF SYSTEMS [J].
COOK, SA ;
RECKHOW, RA .
JOURNAL OF SYMBOLIC LOGIC, 1979, 44 (01) :36-50
[8]  
Dubois O, 2000, PROCEEDINGS OF THE ELEVENTH ANNUAL ACM-SIAM SYMPOSIUM ON DISCRETE ALGORITHMS, P126
[9]  
ESTEBAN JL, 1999, P 16 STACS, P530
[10]   THE INTRACTABILITY OF RESOLUTION [J].
HAKEN, A .
THEORETICAL COMPUTER SCIENCE, 1985, 39 (2-3) :297-308