Stakeholder Involvement in Transdisciplinary Research Lessons from Three Projects on Sustainable Land Management in a North-South Setting

被引:13
作者
Schmidt, Laura [1 ]
Hartberger, Korbinian [2 ]
Kobbe, Susanne [2 ,3 ]
Falk, Thomas [4 ]
Wesselow, Maren [5 ]
Schumann, Charlotte
机构
[1] Univ Hamburg, Inst Geog, Bundesstr 55, D-20146 Hamburg, Germany
[2] Free Univ Berlin, Inst Latin Amer Studies, Berlin, Germany
[3] Univ Hamburg, Inst Zool, Hamburg, Germany
[4] Int Crops Res Inst Semi Arid Trop, Innovat Syst Drylands Program, Patancheru, Andhra Prades, India
[5] Carl von Ossietzky Univ Oldenburg, Dept Business Adm Econ & Law, Oldenburg, Germany
来源
GAIA-ECOLOGICAL PERSPECTIVES FOR SCIENCE AND SOCIETY | 2018年 / 27卷 / 03期
关键词
participatory approaches; stakeholder involvement; sustainable land management; transdisciplinary research; LANDSCAPE DEVELOPMENT; PARTICIPATION; COLLABORATION; KNOWLEDGE;
D O I
10.14512/gaia.27.3.12
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Stakeholder (SH) involvement is a major and ever-challeng ing aspect of transdisciplinary research (TDR). Reflecting on three land management research projects (Carbiocial, SuLaMa, TFO) in a North-South setting, we present their individual approaches for SH involvement and discuss which SH group was involved, when and why. We identify patterns and share lessons learnt that can serve to design TDR projects in general and in a North-South context specifically. Close collaboration with strategic SHs for project conceptualisation and implementation is essential to build ownership and link the project to other SHs. However, structures based on equal partnerships are required. Diversified methods adapted to the specific regional context enable target-oriented involvement during research, but un expected dynamics and diverging interests must be kept in mind. Reflections on the processes of SH involvement in TDR project teams are vital for easing power imbalances and intercultural misunderstandings.
引用
收藏
页码:312 / 320
页数:9
相关论文
共 22 条
  • [1] Co-production of knowledge in transdisciplinary doctoral theses on landscape development-An analysis of actor roles and knowledge types in different research phases
    Enengel, Barbara
    Muhar, Andreas
    Penker, Marianne
    Freyer, Bernhard
    Drlik, Stephanie
    Ritter, Florian
    [J]. LANDSCAPE AND URBAN PLANNING, 2012, 105 (1-2) : 106 - 117
  • [2] Exploring transdisciplinary integration within a large research program: Empirical lessons from four thematic synthesis processes
    Hoffmann, Sabine
    Pohl, Christian
    Hering, Janet G.
    [J]. RESEARCH POLICY, 2017, 46 (03) : 678 - 692
  • [3] KFPE, 2012, GUID TRANSB RES PART
  • [4] Kobbe S, 2017, SULAMA PARTICIPATORY
  • [5] Functional-dynamic public participation in technological decision-making: site selection processes of nuclear waste repositories
    Kruetli, Pius
    Stauffacher, Michael
    Flueeler, Thomas
    Scholz, Roland W.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF RISK RESEARCH, 2010, 13 (07) : 861 - 875
  • [6] Transdisciplinary research in sustainability science: practice, principles, and challenges
    Lang, Daniel J.
    Wiek, Arnim
    Bergmann, Matthias
    Stauffacher, Michael
    Martens, Pim
    Moll, Peter
    Swilling, Mark
    Thomas, Christopher J.
    [J]. SUSTAINABILITY SCIENCE, 2012, 7 : 25 - 43
  • [7] Liniger H.P., 2017, Making Sense of Research for Sustainable Land Management
  • [8] Consulting versus participatory transdisciplinarity: A refined classification of transdisciplinary research
    Mobjork, Malin
    [J]. FUTURES, 2010, 42 (08) : 866 - 873
  • [9] Muhar A., 2018, GAIA, V27, P272, DOI [10.14512/gaia.27.3.3, DOI 10.14512/GAIA.27.3.3]
  • [10] Nowotny H., 2000, GAIA, V9, P1