Forgoing treatment at the end of life in 6 European countries

被引:74
作者
Bosshard, G [1 ]
Nilstun, T
Bilsen, J
Norup, M
Miccinesi, G
van Delden, JJM
Faisst, K
van der Heide, A
机构
[1] Univ Zurich, Inst Legal Med, CH-8057 Zurich, Switzerland
[2] Lund Univ, Dept Med Ethics, Lund, Sweden
[3] Free Univ Brussels, Dept Med Sociol & Hlth Sci, Brussels, Belgium
[4] Univ Copenhagen, Dept Med Philosophy & Clin Theory, Copenhagen, Denmark
[5] Ctr Study & Prevent Canc, Florence, Italy
[6] Univ Utrecht, Ctr Med, Julius Ctr Hlth Sci, Utrecht, Netherlands
[7] Univ Zurich, Inst Social & Prevent Med, CH-8006 Zurich, Switzerland
[8] Univ Rotterdam Hosp, Ctr Med, Erasmus MC, Dept Publ Hlth, Rotterdam, Netherlands
基金
英国经济与社会研究理事会;
关键词
D O I
10.1001/archinte.165.4.401
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Modern medicine provides unprecedented opportunities in diagnostics and treatment. However, in some situations at the end of a patient's life, many physicians refrain from using all possible measures to prolong life. We studied the incidence of different types of treatment withheld or withdrawn in 6 European countries and analyzed the main background characteristics. Methods: Between June 2001 and February 2002, samples were obtained from deaths reported to registries in Belgium, Denmark, Italy, the Netherlands, Sweden, and Switzerland. The reporting physician was then sent a questionnaire about the medical decision-making process that preceded the patient's death. Results: The incidence of nontreatment decisions, whether or not combined with other end-of-life decisions, varied widely from 6% of all deaths studied in Italy to 41% in Switzerland. Most frequently forgone in every country were hydration or nutrition and medication, together representing between 62% (Belgium) and 71% (Italy) of all treatments withheld or withdrawn. Forgoing treatment estimated to prolong life for more than I month was more common in the Netherlands (10%), Belgium (9%), and Switzerland (8%) than in Denmark (5%), Italy (3%), and Sweden (2%). Relevant determinants of treatment being withheld rather than withdrawn were older age (odds ratio [OR], 1.53; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.31-1.79), death outside the hospital (death in hospital: OR, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.68-0.93), and greater lifeshortening effect (OR, 1.75; 95% Cl, 1.27-2.39). Conclusions: In all of the participating countries, life prolonging treatment is withheld or withdrawn at the end of life. Frequencies vary greatly among countries. Low technology interventions, such as medication or hydration or nutrition, are most frequently forgone. in older patients and outside the hospital, physicians prefer not to initiate life-prolonging treatment at all rather than stop it later.
引用
收藏
页码:401 / 407
页数:7
相关论文
共 23 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 1996, Hastings Cent Rep, V26, pS1
  • [2] The sequence of withdrawing life-sustaining treatment from patients
    Asch, DA
    Faber-Langendoen, K
    Shea, JA
    Christakis, NA
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1999, 107 (02) : 153 - 156
  • [3] THE LEAST WORST DEATH
    BATTIN, MP
    [J]. HASTINGS CENTER REPORT, 1983, 13 (02) : 13 - 16
  • [4] End-of-life decisions in neonatal intensive care: physicians' self-reported practices in seven European countries
    Cuttini, M
    Nadai, M
    Kaminski, M
    Hansen, G
    de Leeuw, R
    Lenoir, S
    Persson, J
    Rebagliato, M
    Reid, M
    de Vonderweid, U
    Lenard, HG
    Orzalesi, M
    Saracci, R
    [J]. LANCET, 2000, 355 (9221) : 2112 - 2118
  • [5] End-of-life decisions in medical practice in Flanders, Belgium: a nationwide survey
    Deliens, L
    Mortier, F
    Bilsen, J
    Cosyns, M
    Vander Stichele, R
    Vanoverloop, J
    Ingels, K
    [J]. LANCET, 2000, 356 (9244) : 1806 - 1811
  • [6] A multi-institutional study of care given to patients dying in hospitals - Ethical and practice implications
    FaberLangendoen, K
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 1996, 156 (18) : 2130 - 2136
  • [7] A nationwide study of decisions to forego life-prolonging treatment in Dutch medical practice
    Groenewoud, JH
    van der Heide, A
    Kester, JGC
    de Graaff, CLM
    van der Wal, G
    van der Maas, PJ
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2000, 160 (03) : 357 - 363
  • [8] Age-related differences in care preferences, treatment decisions, and clinical outcomes of seriously ill hospitalized adults: Lessons from SUPPORT
    Hamel, MB
    Lynn, J
    Teno, JM
    Covinsky, KE
    Wu, AW
    Galanos, A
    Desbiens, NA
    Phillips, RS
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN GERIATRICS SOCIETY, 2000, 48 (05) : S176 - S182
  • [9] Conditions and consequences of medical futility -: from a literature review to a clinical model
    Löfmark, R
    Nilstun, T
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ETHICS, 2002, 28 (02) : 115 - 119
  • [10] Dying with cancer: Patients' function, symptoms, and care preferences as death approaches
    McCarthy, EP
    Phillips, RS
    Zhong, ZS
    Drews, RE
    Lynn, J
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN GERIATRICS SOCIETY, 2000, 48 (05) : S110 - S121