Statistical Test of Expression Pattern (STEPath): a new strategy to integrate gene expression data with genomic information in individual and meta-analysis studies

被引:4
作者
Martini, Paolo [1 ,2 ]
Risso, Davide [3 ]
Sales, Gabriele [3 ]
Romualdi, Chiara [2 ]
Lanfranchi, Gerolamo [1 ,2 ]
Cagnin, Stefano [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Padua, CRIBI Biotechnol Ctr, I-35121 Padua, Italy
[2] Univ Padua, Dept Biol, I-35121 Padua, Italy
[3] Univ Padua, Dept Stat Sci, I-35121 Padua, Italy
来源
BMC BIOINFORMATICS | 2011年 / 12卷
关键词
MOLECULAR DIAGNOSTICS APPLICATIONS; BREAST-CANCER; MULTIPLE BIOMARKERS; MICROARRAY DATA; CALPAIN; IDENTIFICATION; VALIDATION; DEFICIENCY; ABNORMALITIES; SIGNATURES;
D O I
10.1186/1471-2105-12-92
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Background: In the last decades, microarray technology has spread, leading to a dramatic increase of publicly available datasets. The first statistical tools developed were focused on the identification of significant differentially expressed genes. Later, researchers moved toward the systematic integration of gene expression profiles with additional biological information, such as chromosomal location, ontological annotations or sequence features. The analysis of gene expression linked to physical location of genes on chromosomes allows the identification of transcriptionally imbalanced regions, while, Gene Set Analysis focuses on the detection of coordinated changes in transcriptional levels among sets of biologically related genes. In this field, meta-analysis offers the possibility to compare different studies, addressing the same biological question to fully exploit public gene expression datasets. Results: We describe STEPath, a method that starts from gene expression profiles and integrates the analysis of imbalanced region as an a priori step before performing gene set analysis. The application of STEPath in individual studies produced gene set scores weighted by chromosomal activation. As a final step, we propose a way to compare these scores across different studies (meta-analysis) on related biological issues. One complication with meta-analysis is batch effects, which occur because molecular measurements are affected by laboratory conditions, reagent lots and personnel differences. Major problems occur when batch effects are correlated with an outcome of interest and lead to incorrect conclusions. We evaluated the power of combining chromosome mapping and gene set enrichment analysis, performing the analysis on a dataset of leukaemia (example of individual study) and on a dataset of skeletal muscle diseases (meta-analysis approach). In leukaemia, we identified the Hox gene set, a gene set closely related to the pathology that other algorithms of gene set analysis do not identify, while the meta-analysis approach on muscular disease discriminates between related pathologies and correlates similar ones from different studies. Conclusions: STEPath is a new method that integrates gene expression profiles, genomic co-expressed regions and the information about the biological function of genes. The usage of the STEPath-computed gene set scores overcomes batch effects in the meta-analysis approaches allowing the direct comparison of different pathologies and different studies on a gene set activation level.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 71 条
  • [1] Chromosomal profiles of gene expression in Huntington's disease
    Anderson, Alexander N.
    Roncaroli, Federico
    Hodges, Angela
    Deprez, Manuel
    Turkheimer, Federico E.
    [J]. BRAIN, 2008, 131 : 381 - 388
  • [2] Hox genes in hematopoiesis and leukemogenesis
    Argiropoulos, B.
    Humphries, R. K.
    [J]. ONCOGENE, 2007, 26 (47) : 6766 - 6776
  • [3] Gene Ontology: tool for the unification of biology
    Ashburner, M
    Ball, CA
    Blake, JA
    Botstein, D
    Butler, H
    Cherry, JM
    Davis, AP
    Dolinski, K
    Dwight, SS
    Eppig, JT
    Harris, MA
    Hill, DP
    Issel-Tarver, L
    Kasarskis, A
    Lewis, S
    Matese, JC
    Richardson, JE
    Ringwald, M
    Rubin, GM
    Sherlock, G
    [J]. NATURE GENETICS, 2000, 25 (01) : 25 - 29
  • [4] Nuclear envelope dystrophies show a transcriptional fingerprint suggesting disruption of Rb-MyoD pathways in muscle regeneration
    Bakay, M
    Wang, ZY
    Melcon, G
    Schiltz, L
    Xuan, JH
    Zhao, P
    Sartorelli, V
    Seo, J
    Pegoraro, E
    Angelini, C
    Shneiderman, B
    Escolar, D
    Chen, YW
    Winokur, ST
    Pachman, LM
    Fan, CG
    Mandler, R
    Nevo, Y
    Gordon, E
    Zhu, YT
    Dong, YB
    Wang, Y
    Hoffman, EP
    [J]. BRAIN, 2006, 129 : 996 - 1013
  • [5] NCBI GEO: archive for high-throughput functional genomic data
    Barrett, Tanya
    Troup, Dennis B.
    Wilhite, Stephen E.
    Ledoux, Pierre
    Rudnev, Dmitry
    Evangelista, Carlos
    Kim, Irene F.
    Soboleva, Alexandra
    Tomashevsky, Maxim
    Marshall, Kimberly A.
    Phillippy, Katherine H.
    Sherman, Patti M.
    Muertter, Rolf N.
    Edgar, Ron
    [J]. NUCLEIC ACIDS RESEARCH, 2009, 37 : D885 - D890
  • [6] Significance analysis of functional categories in gene expression studies: a structured permutation approach
    Barry, WT
    Nobel, AB
    Wright, FA
    [J]. BIOINFORMATICS, 2005, 21 (09) : 1943 - 1949
  • [7] Calpain 3, the "gatekeeper" of proper sarcomere assembly, turnover and maintenance
    Beckmann, Jacques S.
    Spencer, Melissa
    [J]. NEUROMUSCULAR DISORDERS, 2008, 18 (12) : 913 - 921
  • [8] CONTROLLING THE FALSE DISCOVERY RATE - A PRACTICAL AND POWERFUL APPROACH TO MULTIPLE TESTING
    BENJAMINI, Y
    HOCHBERG, Y
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL STATISTICAL SOCIETY SERIES B-STATISTICAL METHODOLOGY, 1995, 57 (01) : 289 - 300
  • [9] BOLSTAD BM, PREPROCESSCORE COLLE
  • [10] Minimum information about a microarray experiment (MIAME) - toward standards for microarray data
    Brazma, A
    Hingamp, P
    Quackenbush, J
    Sherlock, G
    Spellman, P
    Stoeckert, C
    Aach, J
    Ansorge, W
    Ball, CA
    Causton, HC
    Gaasterland, T
    Glenisson, P
    Holstege, FCP
    Kim, IF
    Markowitz, V
    Matese, JC
    Parkinson, H
    Robinson, A
    Sarkans, U
    Schulze-Kremer, S
    Stewart, J
    Taylor, R
    Vilo, J
    Vingron, M
    [J]. NATURE GENETICS, 2001, 29 (04) : 365 - 371