Common idiosyncratic volatility and returns: From an investment horizon perspective

被引:0
|
作者
Yin, Libo [1 ]
Shu, Tengjia [2 ]
Su, Zhi [3 ]
机构
[1] Cent Univ Finance & Econ, Sch Finance, 39 South Coll Rd, Beijing 100081, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Iowa, Tippie Coll Business, Iowa City, IA USA
[3] Cent Univ Finance & Econ, Sch Stat & Math, Beijing, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Chinese stock market; idiosyncratic risk-return puzzle; idiosyncratic volatility; investment horizon perspective; wavelet multiresolution analysis; CROSS-SECTION; MARKET; RISK; STOCKS; INVESTORS; DYNAMICS; MATTER; EQUILIBRIUM; OWNERSHIP; BEHAVIOR;
D O I
10.1002/ijfe.1668
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
"Idiosyncratic risk-return puzzle" is conflicting and confusing. It becomes more complex by the introduction of the common idiosyncratic volatility (CIV). We shed new light on the issue from the perspective of heterogeneity of investors with different investment horizons. We study the "CIV puzzle" with Chinese A-Share market evidence and further contribute by employing the wavelet multiresolution analysis framework to decompose the overall CIV into timescales that refer to risks in different terms. We apply these timescales in Fama-Macbeth regressions to investigate their pricing effects. The results suggest that the "CIV puzzle" is an investment horizon specification problem. The relationship between returns and common idiosyncratic risk is negative in the short run, positive in the intermediate run, and then negative again in the longer run. We also contribute to the international empirical evidence with an in-depth analysis of the Chinese stock market over the period 1999-2016. The results are robust across different specifications of the CIV. Our findings have important implications for portfolio and risk management.
引用
收藏
页码:370 / 390
页数:21
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Idiosyncratic volatility and stock returns: Indian evidence
    Aziz, Tariq
    Ansari, Valeed Ahmad
    COGENT ECONOMICS & FINANCE, 2018, 5 (01):
  • [42] The role of reference-dependent preferences in the idiosyncratic volatility puzzle: Evidence from Korea
    Minh Hang, Le Thi
    Van Hai, Hoang
    Truong Son, Nguyen
    COGENT ECONOMICS & FINANCE, 2020, 8 (01):
  • [43] Determinants of idiosyncratic volatility: Evidence from the Indian stock market
    Kumari, Jyoti
    Mahakud, Jitendra
    Hiremath, Gourishankar S.
    RESEARCH IN INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS AND FINANCE, 2017, 41 : 172 - 184
  • [44] Exploring the Nonlinear Idiosyncratic Volatility Puzzle: Evidence from China
    Li, Bo
    Boubaker, Sabri
    Liu, Zhenya
    Louhichi, Wael
    Yao, Yao
    COMPUTATIONAL ECONOMICS, 2023, 62 (02) : 527 - 559
  • [45] Idiosyncratic volatility and the cross-section of abnormal returns in Pakistan: Evidence from a country with religious bans on lotteries and substantive institutional investor participation
    Khurram, Muhammad Usman
    Ali, Fahad
    Ulku, Numan
    INTERNATIONAL REVIEW OF ECONOMICS & FINANCE, 2025, 98
  • [46] The relationship between institutional ownership and idiosyncratic volatility: evidence from the stock markets of China and the USA
    Hu, Yu
    Jiang, Xiaoquan
    Xue, Wenjun
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EMERGING MARKETS, 2024, 19 (09) : 2549 - 2573
  • [47] Idiosyncratic skewness, gambling preference, and cross-section of stock returns: Evidence from China
    Yao, Shouyu
    Wang, Chunfeng
    Cui, Xin
    Fang, Zhenming
    PACIFIC-BASIN FINANCE JOURNAL, 2019, 53 : 464 - 483
  • [48] Is the idiosyncratic volatility anomaly driven by the MAX or MIN effect? Evidence from the Chinese stock market
    Wan, Xiaoyuan
    INTERNATIONAL REVIEW OF ECONOMICS & FINANCE, 2018, 53 : 1 - 15
  • [49] Idiosyncratic volatility and excess Return: Evidence from the Greater China region
    Wang, Li-Hsun
    Lin, Chu-Hsiung
    Kang, Jui-Heng
    Fung, Hung-Gay
    FINANCE RESEARCH LETTERS, 2016, 19 : 126 - 129
  • [50] Limits of arbitrage and idiosyncratic volatility: Evidence from China stock market
    Gu, Ming
    Kang, Wenjin
    Xu, Bu
    JOURNAL OF BANKING & FINANCE, 2018, 86 : 240 - 258