Comparison of Dual β-Lactam therapy to penicillin-aminoglycoside combination in treatment of Enterococcus faecalis infective endocarditis

被引:30
作者
El Rafei, Abdelghani [1 ,6 ]
DeSimone, Daniel C. [1 ]
Narichania, Aalap D. [4 ]
Sohail, M. Rizwan [1 ,2 ]
Vikram, Holenarasipur R. [5 ]
Li, Zhuo [3 ]
Steckelberg, James M. [1 ]
Wilson, Walter R. [1 ]
Baddour, Larry M. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Mayo Clin, Div Infect Dis, Rochester, MN 55902 USA
[2] Mayo Clin, Dept Cardiovasc Dis, Rochester, MN 55902 USA
[3] Mayo Clin, cDiv Biomed Stat & Informat, Jacksonville, FL 32224 USA
[4] Univ Wisconsin, Dept Cardiovasc Dis, Madison, WI USA
[5] Mayo Clin, Div Infect Dis, Phoenix, AZ USA
[6] Univ Minnesota, Dept Med, Box 736 UMHC, Minneapolis, MN 55455 USA
关键词
Enterococcus faecalis; Infective endocarditis; beta-lactam; Aminoglycoside; Ceftriaxone; AMPICILLIN PLUS CEFTRIAXONE; INTERNATIONAL COLLABORATION; GENTAMICIN; EFFICACY; DEFINITION; RESISTANT; DIAGNOSIS; COHORT; ADULTS;
D O I
10.1016/j.jinf.2018.06.013
中图分类号
R51 [传染病];
学科分类号
100401 ;
摘要
Background: Dual beta-lactam therapy and a penicillin-aminoglycoside combination are first line regimens in the treatment of penicillin-susceptible Enterococcus faecalis infective endocarditis (EFIE). Our aim was to compare ampicillin plus ceftriaxone (A+C) to ampicillin plus gentamicin (A+G) in the treatment of EFIE. Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study of adults (>= 18 years) patients diagnosed with EFIE at Mayo Clinic campuses in Rochester, Minnesota, and Phoenix, Arizona and treated with either A+C or A+G. Main outcome measurements were 1 year mortality, nephrotoxicity, and EFIE relapse rates. Results: Eighty-five cases of EFIE were included in this investigation. The majority (n=67, 79%) of patients received A+G while 18 (21%) patients received A+C as initial treatment. On admission, patients who received A+C had a higher Charlson Comorbidity Index (median [IQR], 4 [3, 4 vs. 2 [1, 4]; P=.008) and a higher baseline serum creatinine (median [IQR], 1.2 [0.9, 1.6] vs. 0.9 [0.8, 1.2] mg/dL, P=.020). The 1 year mortality rates were similar for both treatment groups, 17% vs. 17%, P=.982. Each group had 1 case of relapsing EFIE. Patients who received A+G had worse kidney function outcome demonstrated by a greater increase in serum creatinine at end of therapy (median [IQR] difference, +0.4 [0.2, 0.8] vs. -0.2 [-0.3, 0.1] mg/dL, P <=.001). Conclusion: A+C appears to be a safe and efficacious regimen in the treatment of EFIE. Patients treated with A+C had lower rates of nephrotoxicity and no differences in relapse rate and 1-year mortality as compared to that of the A+G group. (C) 2018 The British Infection Association. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:398 / 404
页数:7
相关论文
共 31 条
  • [21] Enterococcus faecalis Infective Endocarditis A Pilot Study of the Relationship Between Duration of Gentamicin Treatment and Outcome
    Dahl, Anders
    Rasmussen, Rasmus V.
    Bundgaard, Henning
    Hassager, Christian
    Bruun, Louise E.
    Lauridsen, Trine K.
    Moser, Claus
    Sogaard, Peter
    Arpi, Magnus
    Bruun, Niels E.
    CIRCULATION, 2013, 127 (17) : 1810 - 1817
  • [22] The optimal aminoglycoside and its dosage for the treatment of severe Enterococcus faecalis infection. An experimental study in the rabbit endocarditis model
    Dube, L.
    Caillon, J.
    Jacqueline, C.
    Bugnon, D.
    Potel, G.
    Asseray, N.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY & INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2012, 31 (10) : 2545 - 2547
  • [23] Successful salvage treatment of native valve Enterococcus faecalis infective endocarditis with telavancin: two case reports
    Thompson, Mickala M.
    Hassoun, Ali
    INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2017, 49 (07) : 540 - 544
  • [24] Is There Evidence on the Optimal Duration of Aminoglycoside Therapy in ,β-Lactam/Aminoglycoside Combination Regimens Used for the Treatment of Gram-Negative Bacterial Infections? A Systematic Review
    Wale, Yalew M.
    Roberts, Jason A.
    Wolie, Zenaw T.
    Sime, Fekade B.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS, 2024, 64 (04)
  • [25] Combination antibiotic therapy for the treatment of infective endocarditis due to enterococci
    Sebastiano Leone
    Silvana Noviello
    Silvano Esposito
    Infection, 2016, 44 : 273 - 281
  • [26] Efficacy of teicoplanin monotherapy following initial standard therapy in Enterococcus faecalis infective endocarditis: a retrospective cohort study
    Thomas De Nadaï
    Mathilde François
    Agnès Sommet
    Damien Dubois
    David Metsu
    Marion Grare
    Bruno Marchou
    Pierre Delobel
    Guillaume Martin-Blondel
    Infection, 2019, 47 : 463 - 469
  • [27] Infective endocarditis due to high level aminoglycoside resistant Enterococcus faecalis and methicillin resistant coagulase-negative staphylococci presenting with rheumatic manifestations
    Piskin, Nihal
    Akduman, Deniz
    Aydemir, Hande
    Celebi, Gueven
    Oeztoprak, Nefise
    Aktas, Elif
    MIKROBIYOLOJI BULTENI, 2008, 42 (03): : 509 - 514
  • [28] The optimal aminoglycoside and its dosage for the treatment of severe Enterococcus faecalis infection. An experimental study in the rabbit endocarditis model
    L. Dubé
    J. Caillon
    C. Jacqueline
    D. Bugnon
    G. Potel
    N. Asseray
    European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases, 2012, 31 : 2545 - 2547
  • [29] Beta-lactam combination therapy for the treatment of Staphylococcus aureus and Enterococcus species bacteremia: A summary and appraisal of the evidence
    Bartash, Rachel
    Nori, Priya
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2017, 63 : 7 - 12
  • [30] Early in vitro development of daptomycin non-susceptibility in high-level aminoglycoside-resistant Enterococcus faecalis predicts the efficacy of the combination of high-dose daptomycin plus ampicillin in an in vivo model of experimental endocarditis
    Pericas, J. M.
    Garcia-de-la-Maria, C.
    Brunet, M.
    Armero, Y.
    Garcia-Gonzalez, J.
    Casals, G.
    Almela, M.
    Quintana, E.
    Falces, C.
    Ninot, S.
    Fuster, D.
    Llopis, J.
    Marco, F.
    Moreno, A.
    Miro, J. M.
    JOURNAL OF ANTIMICROBIAL CHEMOTHERAPY, 2017, 72 (06) : 1714 - 1722