Effect of spinal manipulative treatment on cardiovascular autonomic control in patients with acute low back pain

被引:24
作者
Younes, Mohamed [1 ,2 ]
Nowakowski, Karine [3 ]
Didier-Laurent, Benoit [3 ]
Gombert, Michel [3 ]
Cottin, Francois [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Paris Saclay, Univ Paris Sud, CIAMS, F-91405 Orsay, France
[2] Univ Orleans, CIAMS, F-45067 Orleans, France
[3] ESO Paris SUPOSTEO, F-77420 Champs Sur Marne, France
关键词
Baroreflex; Blood pressure; Heart rate; Autonomic nervous system; Back pain; Spinal manipulation; Randomized study; Pain scale; HEART-RATE-VARIABILITY; BLOOD-PRESSURE VARIABILITY; VISUAL ANALOG SCALE; BAROREFLEX SENSITIVITY; SPECTRAL-ANALYSIS; EXERCISE; FREQUENCY; RESPONSES; TIME;
D O I
10.1186/s12998-017-0167-6
中图分类号
R49 [康复医学];
学科分类号
100215 ;
摘要
Background: This study aimed to quantify the effect of spinal manipulative treatment (SMT) from an analysis of baroreflex, systolic blood pressure and heart rate variability (HRV) on patients with acute back pain. It was hypothesized that SMT would increase the parasympathetic cardiovascular autonomic control. Methods: Twenty-two patients with acute back pain were randomly divided into two groups: one receiving sham treatment (Sham) and the other receiving SMT. Recordings were completed during the first day and the seventh day, immediately before and after treatment on both days. ECG and systolic blood pressure were continuously recorded to compute cardiovascular variability and baroreflex sensitivity components. The perceived level of pain was measured with the numeric pain scale (NPS) 48 h before, just before and just after each treatment. The NPS ranged from 0 to 100% (peak of pain before treatment). ECG and systolic blood pressure recordings were analyzed in time frequency domain using the Smoothed pseudo Wigner-Ville distribution. Results: Root mean square of the successive differences, high frequency power of the heart rate variability, and high frequency baroreflex sensitivity differences between post and pre tests were higher in the SMT group than in the Sham group (p < 0.01), whereas no differences were observed with the other heart rate variability components. Also, no differences were observed with the systolic blood pressure components. Although the estimated pain scale values decreased over time, no difference was observed between the SMT and Sham groups. Conclusions: This seems to be the first study to assess the effect of SMT on both heart rate variability and baroreflex sensitivity in patients with acute back pain. SMT can be seen to provoke an increase in parasympathetic control known to relate to a person's healthy state. Thus, cardiovascular variability analysis may be a useful tool for clinicians to quantify and objectify the beneficial effects of spinal manipulation treatment.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Blood pressure variability and cardiovascular autonomic control during hemodialysis in peripheral vascular disease patients
    Titapiccolo, Jasmine Ion
    Cerutti, Sergio
    Garzotto, Francesco
    Cruz, Dinna
    Moissl, Ulrich
    Tetta, Ciro
    Signorini, Maria Gabriella
    Ronco, Claudio
    Ferrario, Manuela
    PHYSIOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT, 2012, 33 (04) : 667 - 678
  • [42] Comparing the Effectiveness of Cognitive Functional Treatment and Lumbar Stabilization Treatment on Pain and Movement Control in Patients With Low Back Pain
    Khodadad, Behrouz
    Letafatkar, Amir
    Hadadnezhad, Malihe
    Shojaedin, Sadredin
    SPORTS HEALTH-A MULTIDISCIPLINARY APPROACH, 2020, 12 (03): : 289 - 295
  • [43] Neurophysiologic effects of spinal manipulation in patients with chronic low back pain
    Clark, Brian C.
    Goss, David A., Jr.
    Walkowski, Stevan
    Hoffman, Richard L.
    Ross, Andrew
    Thomas, James S.
    BMC MUSCULOSKELETAL DISORDERS, 2011, 12
  • [44] Neurophysiologic effects of spinal manipulation in patients with chronic low back pain
    Brian C Clark
    David A Goss
    Stevan Walkowski
    Richard L Hoffman
    Andrew Ross
    James S Thomas
    BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, 12
  • [45] Predictors of pain and function in persons with spinal stenosis, low back pain, and no back pain
    Haig, Andrew J.
    Tong, Henry C.
    Yamakawa, Karen S. J.
    Parres, Christopher
    Quint, Douglas J.
    Chiodo, Anthony
    Miner, Jennifer A.
    Phalke, Vaishali C.
    Hoff, Julian T.
    Geisser, Michael E.
    SPINE, 2006, 31 (25) : 2950 - 2957
  • [46] Osteopathic manipulative treatment results in sustained relief from spinal pain in older patients: A pilot crossover study.
    Pannunzio, A.
    Salemi, F.
    Dacco, S.
    Chiara, Arienti
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MEDICAL RESEARCH & HEALTH SCIENCES, 2016, 5 (01): : 128 - 135
  • [47] Manipulative therapy and/or NSAIDs for acute low back pain: design of a randomized controlled trial [ACTRN012605000036617]
    Mark J Hancock
    Christopher G Maher
    Jane Latimer
    Andrew J McLachlan
    Chris W Cooper
    Richard O Day
    Megan F Spindler
    James H McAuley
    BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, 6
  • [48] Modulations of autonomic cardiovascular control following acute alpha-adrenergic treatment in chronic hypotension
    Stefan Duschek
    Heike Heiss
    Natalie Werner
    Gustavo A Reyes del Paso
    Hypertension Research, 2009, 32 : 938 - 943
  • [49] Effects of spinal manipulation on sensorimotor function in low back pain patients - A randomised controlled trial
    Goertz, Christine M.
    Xia, Ting
    Long, Cynthia R.
    Vining, Robert D.
    Pohlman, Katherine A.
    DeVocht, James W.
    Gudavalli, Maruti R.
    Owens, Edward F., Jr.
    Meeker, William C.
    Wilder, David G.
    MANUAL THERAPY, 2016, 21 : 183 - 190
  • [50] Predictors of outcome in patients with (sub) acute low back pain differ across treatment groups
    Jellema, Petra
    van der Horst, Henriette E.
    Vlaeyen, Johan W. S.
    Stalman, Wim A. B.
    Bouter, Lex M.
    van der Windt, Danielle A. W. M.
    SPINE, 2006, 31 (15) : 1699 - 1705