Radiographic and Histomorphometric Evaluation of Biomaterials Used for Lateral Sinus Augmentation: A Systematic Review on the Effect of Residual Bone Height and Vertical Graft Size on New Bone Formation and Graft Shrinkage

被引:40
作者
Pesce, Paolo [1 ]
Menini, Maria [1 ]
Canullo, Luigi [2 ]
Khijmatgar, Shahnawaz [3 ]
Modenese, Laura [1 ]
Gallifante, Gianmarco [1 ]
Del Fabbro, Massimo [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Genoa, Osped S Martino, Dept Surg Sci DISC, L Rosanna Benzi 10, I-16132 Genoa, Italy
[2] Univ Bern, Dept Periodontol, CH-3012 Bern, Switzerland
[3] Univ Milan, Dept Biomed Surg & Dent Sci, I-20122 Milan, Italy
[4] IRCCS Orthoped Inst Galeazzi, I-20161 Milan, Italy
关键词
sinus lift; bone regeneration; biomaterials; grafts; BIPHASIC CALCIUM-PHOSPHATE; FRESH-FROZEN ALLOGRAFT; EARLY VOLUME STABILITY; MAXILLARY SINUS; FLOOR ELEVATION; BOVINE BONE; AUTOGENOUS BONE; DEPROTEINIZED BOVINE; INTRAOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; POSTERIOR MAXILLA;
D O I
10.3390/jcm10214996
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
The aim of the present systematic review was to investigate the effect of residual bone height (RBH) and vertical bone gain on new bone formation (NBF) and graft shrinkage after lateral sinus lifts using different biomaterials. Methods: An electronic search was conducted on three databases to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published until January 2021 with at least one follow-up at 6 months and at least five patients treated, comparing biomaterials used for maxillary sinus augmentation with a lateral approach. Graft volumetric changes, RBH, vertical bone gain, implant failure, and post-operative complications were evaluated. The risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane tool. Results: We used 4010 identified studies, of which 21 were RCTs. Overall, 412 patients and 533 sinuses were evaluated. Only three publications had an overall low risk of bias. After 6 months, xenograft (XG) showed the least volume reduction (7.30 & PLUSMN; 15.49%), while autogenous graft (AU) was the most reabsorbed (41.71 & PLUSMN; 12.63%). NBF appeared to not be directly correlated with RBH; on the contrary, the overall linear regression analysis showed that NBF significantly decreased by 1.6% for each mm of postoperative vertical graft gain. This finding suggests that the greater the augmentation, the lower the NBF. A similar tendency, with a regression coefficient even higher than the overall one, was also observed with alloplast (AP) and XG. Conclusions: The present results suggested that NBF was essentially independent of preoperative bone height. On the contrary, the smaller the volume was of the graft placed, the higher the amount of new bone formed, and the smaller the graft shrinkage was. Minimizing the augmentation volume might be beneficial to graft healing and stability especially when using AP and XG.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 20 条
  • [1] Bone Graft Osseous Changes After Maxillary Sinus Floor Augmentation: A Systematic Review
    Al-Moraissi, Essam
    Alhajj, Wadhah Abdulnasser
    Al-Qadhi, Gamilah
    Christidis, Nikolaos
    JOURNAL OF ORAL IMPLANTOLOGY, 2022, 48 (05) : 464 - 471
  • [2] Two Composite Bone Graft Substitutes for Maxillary Sinus Floor Augmentation: Histological, Histomorphometric, and Radiographic Analyses
    Ahmet, Safak
    Gultekin, Bahattin Alper
    Karabuda, Zihni Cuneyt
    Olgac, Vakur
    IMPLANT DENTISTRY, 2016, 25 (03) : 313 - 321
  • [3] Varying Influence of Maxillary Sinus Dimensions on New Bone Formation With Various Graft Materials in Lateral Window Sinus Augmentation-A Retrospective Study
    Stefan, Krennmair
    Michael, Weinlaender
    Uwe-Yalcin, Schwarze
    Michael, Malek
    Thomas, Forstner
    Gerald, Krennmair
    CLINICAL IMPLANT DENTISTRY AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2025, 27 (02)
  • [4] Residual Bone Height and New Bone Formation after Maxillary Sinus Augmentation Procedure Using Biomaterials: A Network Meta-Analysis of Clinical Trials
    Khijmatgar, Shahnavaz
    Del Fabbro, Massimo
    Tumedei, Margherita
    Testori, Tiziano
    Cenzato, Niccolo
    Tartaglia, Gianluca Martino
    MATERIALS, 2023, 16 (04)
  • [5] A Meta-Analysis of Histomorphometric Results and Graft Healing Time of Various Biomaterials Compared to Autologous Bone Used as Sinus Floor Augmentation Material in Humans
    Klijn, Reinoud J.
    Meijer, Gert J.
    Bronkhorst, Ewald M.
    Jansen, John A.
    TISSUE ENGINEERING PART B-REVIEWS, 2010, 16 (05) : 493 - 507
  • [6] Radiographic and histologic evaluation of a sinus augmentation with composite bone graft: A clinical case report
    Armand, S
    Kirsch, A
    Sergent, C
    Kemoun, P
    Brunel, G
    JOURNAL OF PERIODONTOLOGY, 2002, 73 (09) : 1082 - 1088
  • [7] Comparative analysis of two biomaterials mixed with autogenous bone graft for vertical ridge augmentation: A histomorphometric study in humans
    Gallo, Pier
    Diaz-Baez, David
    Perdomo, Sandra
    Aloise, Antonio Carlos
    Tattan, Mustafa
    Saleh, Muhammad H. A.
    Pelegrine, Andre Antonio
    Ravida, Andrea
    Wang, Hom-Lay
    CLINICAL IMPLANT DENTISTRY AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2022, 24 (05) : 709 - 719
  • [8] The Influence of Residual Alveolar Bone Height on Graft Composition after Maxillary Sinus Augmentation Using Two Different Xenografts: A Histomorphometric Comparative Study
    Taschieri, Silvio
    Ofer, Moses
    Corbella, Stefano
    Testori, Tiziano
    Dellavia, Claudia
    Nemcovsky, Carlos
    Canciani, Elena
    Francetti, Luca
    Del Fabbro, Massimo
    Tartaglia, Gianluca
    MATERIALS, 2020, 13 (22) : 1 - 12
  • [9] Histomorphometric results of different grafting materials and effect of healing time on bone maturation after sinus floor augmentation: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Danesh-Sani, S. A.
    Engebretson, S. P.
    Janal, M. N.
    JOURNAL OF PERIODONTAL RESEARCH, 2017, 52 (03) : 301 - 312
  • [10] Does new bone formation vary in different sites within the same maxillary sinus after lateral augmentation? A prospective histomorphometric study
    Stacchi, Claudio
    Rapani, Antonio
    Lombardi, Teresa
    Bernardello, Fabio
    Nicolin, Vanessa
    Berton, Federico
    CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2022, 33 (03) : 322 - 332