Extended Clinical Experience With Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy and Prepectoral Polyurethane Implant Positioning (BRAND4P

被引:7
作者
de Vita, Roy [1 ]
Villanucci, Amedeo [1 ,3 ]
Buccheri, Ernesto Maria [2 ]
Pozzi, Marcello [1 ]
机构
[1] IFO Regina Elena Natl Canc Inst, Dept Plast & Reconstruct Surg, Rome, Italy
[2] Italy Medicinaplasticaroma Ctr, Plast Surg, Rome, Italy
[3] Regina Elena Canc Inst Rome, Plast Reconstruct Surg Dept, Via Elio Chianesi 53, I-00144 Rome, Italy
关键词
Direct-to-implant; Nipple-sparing; Polyurethane; Prepectoral; BRAND4P; IMMEDIATE BREAST RECONSTRUCTION; ACELLULAR DERMAL MATRIX; FOLLOW-UP; MUSCLE; PRE;
D O I
10.1016/j.clbc.2022.03.005
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Implant breast reconstruction is the most common procedure performed in patients who undergo mastectomy for cancer treatment or prophylactic purposes. Traditional techniques involve total or partial implant coverage with chest wall muscles. This study investigates a less invasive technique that involves polyurethane foam covered implant positioning above pectoralis muscle on a great patients' cohort. Favourable outcomes from a relatively long follow-up encourages the reproducibility of our approach. Background: Direct-to-implant prepectoral breast reconstruction in the last years demonstrated to be a feasible and advantageous method in selected cases because it respects chest wall musculature integrity and avoids anima-tion deformity. Current approaches involve implant wrapping with Acellular Dermal Matrix (ADM) or synthetic mesh to guarantee implant coverage and stability and reduce complications. Prepectoral polyurethane implant position-ing without further coverage is an alternative breast reconstruction method poor described in literature. Patient and Methods: A single-institution retrospective analysis was performed on 453 patients, extending our previous prelim-inary experience, who underwent nipple-sparing mastectomy (NSM) and prepectoral polyurethane implant position-ing between December 2017 and June 2021. Follow-up included postoperative complications record and self-reported patient's satisfaction. Results: A total of 784 mastectomies were performed in 453 patients. 331 were bilateral proce-dures (73.1%) and 122 were unilateral (26.9%). Minimum follow-up time was 6 months and maximum was 42 months. No major complications were reported. Contour defects and excessive implant visibility occurred in 82 patients (18.1%) and was successfully managed with autologous fat grafting. Conclusion: Nipple-sparing mastectomy with immedi-ate prepectoral polyurethane implant reconstruction without the need for ADM or mesh is a feasible and safe option. Accurate patient selection and respectful mastectomy technique is crucial to achieve optimal outcomes with this approach. Fat grafting is a useful refinement procedure to improve cosmetic results in this setting.
引用
收藏
页码:E623 / E628
页数:6
相关论文
共 30 条
  • [1] American Society of Plastic Surgeons, Plastic surgery procedural statistics
  • [2] An Algorithmic Approach to Prepectoral Direct-to-Implant Breast Reconstruction: Version 2.0
    Antony, Anuja K.
    Robinson, Emilie C.
    [J]. PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2019, 143 (05) : 1311 - 1319
  • [3] The Impact of Animation Deformity on Quality of Life in Post-Mastectomy Reconstruction Patients
    Becker, Hilton
    Fregosi, Nicole
    [J]. AESTHETIC SURGERY JOURNAL, 2017, 37 (05) : 531 - 536
  • [4] Evaluation of a novel breast reconstruction technique using the Braxon® acellular dermal matrix: a new muscle-sparing breast reconstruction
    Berna, Giorgio
    Cawthorn, Simon J.
    Papaccio, Guido
    Balestrieri, Nicola
    [J]. ANZ JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2017, 87 (06) : 493 - 498
  • [5] Immediate bilateral breast reconstruction with implants and inferolateral AlloDerm slings
    Breuing, KH
    Warren, SM
    [J]. ANNALS OF PLASTIC SURGERY, 2005, 55 (03) : 232 - 239
  • [6] Classification and Management of Seromas in Immediate Breast Reconstruction Using the Tissue Expander and Acellular Dermal Matrix Technique
    Brzezienski, Mark A.
    Jarrell, John A.
    Mooty, Robert Clark
    [J]. ANNALS OF PLASTIC SURGERY, 2013, 70 (05) : 488 - 492
  • [7] CAPOZZI A, 1981, PLAST RECONSTR SURG, V68, P512, DOI 10.1097/00006534-198110000-00006
  • [8] "To Pre or Not to Pre": Introduction of a Prepectoral Breast Reconstruction Assessment Score to Help Surgeons Solving the Decision-Making Dilemma. Retrospective Results of a Multicenter Experience
    Casella, Donato
    Kaciulyte, Juste
    Lo Torto, Federico
    Mori, Francesco L. R.
    Barellini, Leonardo
    Fausto, Alfonso
    Fanelli, Benedetta
    Greco, Manfredi
    Ribuffo, Diego
    Marcasciano, Marco
    [J]. PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2021, 147 (06) : 1278 - 1286
  • [9] Evaluation of Prepectoral Implant Placement and Complete Coverage with TiLoop Bra Mesh for Breast Reconstruction: A Prospective Study on Long-Term and Patient-Reported BREAST-Q Outcomes
    Casella, Donato
    Di Taranto, Giuseppe
    Marcasciano, Marco
    Sordi, Silvia
    Kothari, Ashutosh
    Kovacs, Tibor
    Lo Torto, Federico
    Cigna, Emanuele
    Calabrese, Claudio
    Ribuffo, Diego
    [J]. PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2019, 143 (01) : 1E - 9E
  • [10] TiLoop® Bra mesh used for immediate breast reconstruction: comparison of retropectoral and subcutaneous implant placement in a prospective single-institution series
    Casella D.
    Bernini M.
    Bencini L.
    Roselli J.
    Lacaria M.T.
    Martellucci J.
    Banfi R.
    Calabrese C.
    Orzalesi L.
    [J]. European Journal of Plastic Surgery, 2014, 37 (11) : 599 - 604