Conceptual framework for lean construction ambidexterity in project-based organizations

被引:7
作者
Fang, Yanqing [1 ]
Daniel, Emmanuel Itodo [2 ]
Li, Shuquan [1 ]
机构
[1] Tianjin Univ Finance & Econ, Sch Management Sci & Engn, Tianjin, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Wolverhampton, Sch Architecture & Built Environm, Wolverhampton, England
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Lean construction; ambidextrous capability; paradox; project-based organization; conceptual framework; PRODUCTION FLOW; EXPLOITATION; EXPLORATION; MANAGEMENT; INNOVATION; PARADOX; MODEL; ANTECEDENTS; PERFORMANCE; KNOWLEDGE;
D O I
10.1080/01446193.2021.1978516
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Lean construction (LC) is widely used to eliminate waste in the construction industry. However, few studies have focussed on LC capabilities. In the absence of a theoretical foundation, the equal treatment of inherent rigidity and flexibility has received little attention. This critical literature review answered the following research questions: What is the current understanding of the two characteristics of LC? Is there a theoretical explanation for their relationship? How can LC capabilities be realized in a project-based organization? The results revealed the lack of a clear definition of LC capabilities. The study posits that LC capabilities involve ambidexterity. Ambidexterity embodies the LC philosophy, principles, and methods, with a focus on resolving the paradoxical tensions in LC projects. Ambidexterity was found to be a two-dimensional paradox comprising exploitative and exploratory capabilities. It emphasizes the achievement of a balance between the two capabilities. The proposed model indicates that LC project-based organizations provide the ideal context for the development of ambidexterity. This study uses a paradoxical lens to introduce the notion of LC capabilities as ambidexterity. This research contributes to the current knowledge and future applications of organizational ambidexterity theory to LC capability development. In addition, it will enable practitioners to understand and manage the paradoxical tensions in LC projects. The proposed framework can guide the creation of an ideal LC project-organization environment.
引用
收藏
页码:824 / 838
页数:15
相关论文
共 124 条
  • [1] Labor productivity: Benchmarking and variability in Egyptian projects
    Department of Construction Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Zagazig University, Egypt
    不详
    [J]. Int. J. Proj. Manage., 2007, 2 (189-197): : 189 - 197
  • [2] Adler PaulS., 1999, The Academy of Management Executive, V13, P36
  • [3] Flexibility versus efficiency? A case study of model changeovers in the Toyota production system
    Adler, PS
    Goldoftas, B
    Levine, DI
    [J]. ORGANIZATION SCIENCE, 1999, 10 (01) : 43 - 68
  • [4] Learning Organizations: Managerial Control Systems?
    Akella, Devi
    [J]. GLOBAL BUSINESS REVIEW, 2007, 8 (01) : 13 - 28
  • [5] Alarcon L.F., 2013, Proceedings for the 21st Annual Conference of the International Group for Lean Construction, P247
  • [6] Alarcón LF, 2008, REV ING CONSTR, V23, P26
  • [7] Web-enabled project management: an emerging paradigm in construction
    Alshawi, M
    Ingirige, B
    [J]. AUTOMATION IN CONSTRUCTION, 2003, 12 (04) : 349 - 364
  • [8] Alves T.C.L., 2004, 12 ANN C INT GROUP L
  • [9] Managing Innovation Paradoxes: Ambidexterity Lessons from Leading Product Design Companies
    Andriopoulos, Constantine
    Lewis, Marianne W.
    [J]. LONG RANGE PLANNING, 2010, 43 (01) : 104 - 122
  • [10] Exploitation-Exploration Tensions and Organizational Ambidexterity: Managing Paradoxes of Innovation
    Andriopoulos, Constantine
    Lewis, Marianne W.
    [J]. ORGANIZATION SCIENCE, 2009, 20 (04) : 696 - 717