Practicing retrieval in university teaching: short-answer questions are beneficial, whereas multiple-choice questions are not

被引:5
|
作者
Greving, Sven [1 ]
Richter, Tobias [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Wurzburg, Dept Psychol 4, Rontgenring 10, D-97070 Wurzburg, Germany
关键词
Retrieval practice; testing effect; higher education; direct testing effect; desirable difficulties; LONG-TERM RETENTION; EXAM PERFORMANCE; IMPROVES PERFORMANCE; CLASSROOM; FEEDBACK; TESTS; QUIZZES; CONSEQUENCES; SUPPORT; MODELS;
D O I
10.1080/20445911.2022.2085281
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Proponents of the testing effect claim that answering questions about the learning content benefits retention more than does additional restudying-even without corrective feedback. In educational contexts, evidence for this claim is scarce and points toward differential effects for different question formats: Benefits emerged for short-answer questions but not for multiple-choice questions. The present study implemented an experimentally controlled, minimal intervention design in five sessions of an existing lecture. In each session, participants reviewed lecture content by answering short-answer questions, multiple-choice questions, or reading summarising statements. An unannounced test measured the retention of learning content. Bayesian analyses revealed a positive testing effect for short-answer questions that was strongest for difficult practice questions. Analyses also provided evidence for the absence of a testing effect for multiple-choice questions. These results suggest that short-answer testing is more beneficial than multiple-choice testing in a higher education context when feedback is not provided.
引用
收藏
页码:657 / 674
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Multiple-True-False Questions Reveal the Limits of the Multiple-Choice Format for Detecting Students with Incomplete Understandings
    Couch, Brian A.
    Hubbard, Joanna K.
    Brassil, Chad E.
    BIOSCIENCE, 2018, 68 (06) : 455 - 463
  • [42] Knowledge of dental faculty in gulf cooperation council states of multiple-choice questions' item writing flaws
    Kowash, Mawlood
    Alhobeira, Hazza
    Hussein, Iyad
    Al Halabi, Manal
    Khan, Saif
    MEDICAL EDUCATION ONLINE, 2020, 25 (01):
  • [43] A comparison of the psychometric properties of three- and four-option multiple-choice questions in nursing assessments
    Tarrant, Marie
    Ware, James
    NURSE EDUCATION TODAY, 2010, 30 (06) : 539 - 543
  • [44] Shying away from demanding tasks? Experimental evidence on gender differences in answering multiple-choice questions
    Riener, Gerhard
    Wagner, Valentin
    ECONOMICS OF EDUCATION REVIEW, 2017, 59 : 43 - 62
  • [45] Postexamination item analysis of undergraduate pediatric multiple-choice questions exam: implications for developing a validated question Bank
    Rashwan, Nagwan I.
    Aref, Soha R.
    Nayel, Omnia A.
    Rizk, Mennatallah H.
    BMC MEDICAL EDUCATION, 2024, 24 (01)
  • [46] Student- versus teacher-generated explanations for answers to online multiple-choice questions: What are the differences?
    Yu, Fu-Yun
    Chen, Chiao-Yi
    COMPUTERS & EDUCATION, 2021, 173
  • [47] Assessing the Difficulty and Long-Term Retention of Factual and Conceptual Knowledge Through Multiple-Choice Questions: A Longitudinal Study
    Haycocks, Neil G.
    Hernandez-Moreno, Jessica
    Bester, Johan C.
    Jnr, Robert Hernandez
    Kalili, Rosalie
    Samrao, Daman
    Simanton, Edward
    Vida, Thomas A.
    ADVANCES IN MEDICAL EDUCATION AND PRACTICE, 2024, 15 : 1217 - 1228
  • [48] The self-assessment dilemma: an open-source, ethical method using Matlab to formulate multiple-choice quiz questions for online reinforcement
    Witchel, Harry T.
    Guppy, Joseph H.
    Smith, Claire F.
    ADVANCES IN PHYSIOLOGY EDUCATION, 2018, 42 (04) : 697 - 703
  • [49] Multiple-Choice Questions in Small Animal Medicine: An Analysis of Cognitive Level and Structural Reliability, and the Impact of these Characteristics on Student Performance
    Cook, Audrey K.
    Lidbury, Jonathan A.
    Creevy, Kate E.
    Heseltine, Johanna C.
    Marsilio, Sina
    Catchpole, Brian
    Whittlestone, Kim D.
    JOURNAL OF VETERINARY MEDICAL EDUCATION, 2020, 47 (04) : 497 - 505
  • [50] Efficacy of Faculty Development Training Workshops (FDTWs) on Writing High-Quality Multiple-Choice Questions at Northern Border University (NBU) in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (KSA)
    Agarwal, Anshoo
    Khattak, Osama
    Esmaeel, Safya Ebraheem
    Fahmy, Eslam
    Bayomy, Naglaa Ahmed
    Mehmood, Syed Imran
    Mohamed, Hamza
    Bawadekji, Abdulhakim
    Alotibi, Fahad Abdullah J.
    Alanazi, Malek Saad M.
    Younes, Abeer
    CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2024, 16 (06)