Practicing retrieval in university teaching: short-answer questions are beneficial, whereas multiple-choice questions are not

被引:5
|
作者
Greving, Sven [1 ]
Richter, Tobias [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Wurzburg, Dept Psychol 4, Rontgenring 10, D-97070 Wurzburg, Germany
关键词
Retrieval practice; testing effect; higher education; direct testing effect; desirable difficulties; LONG-TERM RETENTION; EXAM PERFORMANCE; IMPROVES PERFORMANCE; CLASSROOM; FEEDBACK; TESTS; QUIZZES; CONSEQUENCES; SUPPORT; MODELS;
D O I
10.1080/20445911.2022.2085281
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Proponents of the testing effect claim that answering questions about the learning content benefits retention more than does additional restudying-even without corrective feedback. In educational contexts, evidence for this claim is scarce and points toward differential effects for different question formats: Benefits emerged for short-answer questions but not for multiple-choice questions. The present study implemented an experimentally controlled, minimal intervention design in five sessions of an existing lecture. In each session, participants reviewed lecture content by answering short-answer questions, multiple-choice questions, or reading summarising statements. An unannounced test measured the retention of learning content. Bayesian analyses revealed a positive testing effect for short-answer questions that was strongest for difficult practice questions. Analyses also provided evidence for the absence of a testing effect for multiple-choice questions. These results suggest that short-answer testing is more beneficial than multiple-choice testing in a higher education context when feedback is not provided.
引用
收藏
页码:657 / 674
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Retrieval practice with short-answer, multiple-choice, and hybrid tests
    Smith, Megan A.
    Karpicke, Jeffrey D.
    MEMORY, 2014, 22 (07) : 784 - 802
  • [2] Adaptive retrieval practice with multiple-choice questions in the university classroom
    Greving, Sven
    Lenhard, Wolfgang
    Richter, Tobias
    JOURNAL OF COMPUTER ASSISTED LEARNING, 2020, 36 (06) : 799 - 809
  • [3] The Role of Retrieval in Answering Multiple-Choice Questions
    Little, Jeri L.
    Frickey, Elise A.
    Fung, Alexandra K.
    JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-LEARNING MEMORY AND COGNITION, 2019, 45 (08) : 1473 - 1485
  • [4] Delayed, But Not Immediate, Feedback After Multiple-Choice Questions Increases Performance on a Subsequent Short-Answer, But Not Multiple-Choice, Exam: Evidence for the Dual-Process Theory of Memory
    Sinha, Neha
    Glass, Arnold Lewis
    JOURNAL OF GENERAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2015, 142 (02) : 118 - 134
  • [5] Optimizing Multiple-Choice Questions for Retrieval Practice: Delayed Display of Answer Alternatives Enhances Vocabulary Learning
    van den Broek, Gesa S. E.
    Gerritsen, Suzanne L.
    Oomen, Iris T. J.
    Velthoven, Eva
    van Boxtel, Femke H. J.
    Kester, Liesbeth
    van Gog, Tamara
    JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2023, 115 (08) : 1087 - 1109
  • [6] Both Multiple-Choice and Short-Answer Quizzes Enhance Later Exam Performance in Middle and High School Classes
    McDermott, Kathleen B.
    Agarwal, Pooja K.
    D'Antonio, Laura
    Roediger, Henry L., III
    McDaniel, Mark A.
    JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-APPLIED, 2014, 20 (01) : 3 - 21
  • [7] QUALITY AND FEATURE OF MULTIPLE-CHOICE QUESTIONS IN EDUCATION
    Jia, Bing
    He, Dan
    Zhu, Zhemin
    PROBLEMS OF EDUCATION IN THE 21ST CENTURY, 2020, 78 (04) : 576 - 594
  • [8] How to ask sensitive multiple-choice questions
    Lageras, Andreas
    Lindholm, Mathias
    SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF STATISTICS, 2020, 47 (02) : 397 - 424
  • [9] Use of Multiple-Choice Questions in Nursing Research
    Knapp, Thomas R.
    CLINICAL NURSING RESEARCH, 2018, 27 (08) : 911 - 916
  • [10] Multiple-choice questions (MCQs) for higher-order cognition: Perspectives of university teachers
    Liu, Qian
    Wald, Nave
    Daskon, Chandima
    Harland, Tony
    INNOVATIONS IN EDUCATION AND TEACHING INTERNATIONAL, 2024, 61 (04) : 802 - 814