The status of oocyte cryopreservation in the United States

被引:61
作者
Rudick, Briana [1 ]
Opper, Neisha [1 ]
Paulson, Richard [1 ]
Bendikson, Kristin [1 ]
Chung, Karine [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ So Calif, IRD, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Div Reprod Endocrinol & Infertil, Los Angeles, CA 90033 USA
关键词
Oocyte cryopreservation; elective indications; regional trends; ART; survey; statistics; FERTILITY PRESERVATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.fertnstert.2010.04.079
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective: To determine the current status of oocyte cryopreservation across the United States, and the perceived indications for its use. Design: Cross-sectional survey of all IVF Centers in the United States. Setting: Telephone and fax based survey of all IVF practice or laboratory directors, conducted March to June of 2009. Patient(s): None. Intervention(s): None. Main Outcome Measure(s): Prevalence of oocyte cryopreservation, acceptable indications and age groups, number of oocyte cryopreservation cycles performed and thawed, fertilization and pregnancy rates, number of live births. Result(s): Of 442 centers contacted, 282 (64%) responded in 49 states. In these centers 143 (51%) programs currently offer oocyte cryopreservation, with a geographic trend toward the western-located clinics. Of all programs, 36% offer oocyte cryopreservation only for cancer patients or as an alternative to embryo cryopreservation after IVF, whereas 64% of programs offer it electively in women of advancing maternal age. For elective indications, 87% of programs accept patients aged 35-37 years, 49% consider age 38-40 years as acceptable, whereas only 26% of programs cryopreserve oocytes beyond age 40 years. Three hundred thirty-seven live births resulting from 857 thawed cycles (39.3% pregnancy rate [PR]) were reported across all centers. Conclusion(s): Oocyte cryopreservation is offered in more than 50% of ART clinics in the United States. Most programs that perform oocyte cryopreservation for cancer indications offer it for elective delay of childbearing as well. These data suggest a growing acceptance for this technology within our field. (Fertil Steril (R) 2010;94:2642-6. (C) 2010 by American Society for Reproductive Medicine.)
引用
收藏
页码:2642 / 2646
页数:5
相关论文
共 15 条
[1]   Report of four donor-recipient oocyte cryopreservation cycles resulting in high pregnancy and implantation rates [J].
Barritt, Jason ;
Luna, Martha ;
Duke, Marlena ;
Grunfeld, Lawrence ;
Mukherjee, Tanmoy ;
Sandler, Benjamin ;
Copperman, Alan B. .
FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2007, 87 (01) :189.e13-189.e17
[2]  
BECK L, 2009, FERTIL STERIL S3, V92, pP377
[3]  
*CDCP AM SOC REPR, 2008, 2007 ASS REPR TECHN
[4]   PREGNANCY AFTER HUMAN OOCYTE CRYOPRESERVATION [J].
CHEN, C .
LANCET, 1986, 1 (8486) :884-886
[5]   Comparison of concomitant outcome achieved with fresh and cryopreserved donor oocytes vitrified by the Cryotop method [J].
Cobo, Ana ;
Kuwayama, Masashigue ;
Perez, Sonia ;
Ruiz, Amparo ;
Pellicer, Antonio ;
Remohi, Jose .
FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2008, 89 (06) :1657-1664
[6]   Fertility preservation for healthy women: ethical aspects [J].
Dondorp, W. J. ;
De Wert, G. M. W. R. .
HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2009, 24 (08) :1779-1785
[7]   IN FAVOUR OF FREEZING EGGS FOR NON-MEDICAL REASONS [J].
Goold, Imogen ;
Savulescu, Julian .
BIOETHICS, 2009, 23 (01) :47-58
[8]   Delivery rate using cryopreserved oocytes is comparable to conventional in vitro fertilization using fresh oocytes: potential fertility preservation for female cancer patients [J].
Grifo, James A. ;
Noyes, Nicole .
FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2010, 93 (02) :391-396
[9]   Over 900 oocyte cryopreservation babies born with no apparent increase in congenital anomalies [J].
Noyes, N. ;
Porcu, E. ;
Borini, A. .
REPRODUCTIVE BIOMEDICINE ONLINE, 2009, 18 (06) :769-776
[10]   Efficiency of oocyte cryopreservation: a meta-analysis [J].
Oktay, Kutluk ;
Cil, Aylin Pelin ;
Bang, Heejung .
FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2006, 86 (01) :70-80