Which professional (non-technical) competencies are most important to the success of graduate veterinarians? A Best Evidence Medical Education (BEME) systematic review: BEME Guide No. 38

被引:66
|
作者
Cake, Martin A. [1 ]
Bell, Melinda A. [1 ]
Williams, Julie C. [2 ]
Brown, Fiona J. L. [3 ]
Dozier, Marshall [3 ]
Rhind, Susan M. [3 ]
Baillie, Sarah [4 ]
机构
[1] Murdoch Univ, Coll Vet Med, South St, Perth, WA 6150, Australia
[2] Univ Bristol, Sch Oral & Dent Sci, Fac Hlth Sci, Bristol, Avon, England
[3] Univ Edinburgh, Royal Dick Sch Vet Studies, Edinburgh, Midlothian, Scotland
[4] Univ Bristol, Sch Vet Sci, Fac Hlth Sci, Bristol, Avon, England
关键词
COMPANION-ANIMAL PRACTICE; CLIENT-PATIENT COMMUNICATION; STUDENTS PERCEPTIONS; OUTCOMES ASSESSMENT; CAREER SUCCESS; SUPPORT NEEDS; SKILLS; SATISFACTION; ATTRIBUTES; CURRICULUM;
D O I
10.3109/0142159X.2016.1173662
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Background: Despite the growing prominence of professional (non-technical) competencies in veterinary education, the evidence to support their importance to veterinary graduates is unclear.Aim: To summarize current evidence within the veterinary literature for the importance of professional competencies to graduate success.Methods: A systematic search of electronic databases was conducted (CAB Abstracts, Web of Science, PubMed, PsycINFO, ERIC, Australian and British Education Index, Dissertations & Theses) from 1988 to 2015 and limited to the veterinary discipline (veterinar* term required). Evidence was sought from consensus-based competence frameworks, surveys of stakeholder perceptions, and empirical evidence linked to relevant outcomes (e.g. employability, client satisfaction or compliance). Data extraction was completed by two independent reviewers and included a quality assessment of each source.Results: Fifty-two sources were included in the review, providing evidence from expert frameworks (10 sources), stakeholder perceptions (30 sources, including one from the previous category), and empirical research (13 sources). Communication skills were the only competency to be well-supported by all three categories of evidence. Other competencies supported by multiple sources of empirical evidence include empathy, relationship-centered care, self-efficacy, and business skills. Other competencies perceived to be relatively more important included awareness of limitations, professional values, critical thinking, collaboration, and resilience.Conclusions: This review has highlighted the comparatively weak body of evidence supporting the importance of professional competencies for veterinary graduate success, with the exception of communication skills. However we stress this is more indicative of the scarcity of high-quality veterinary-based education research in the field, than of the true priority of these competencies.
引用
收藏
页码:550 / 563
页数:14
相关论文
共 6 条
  • [1] Patient/service user involvement in medical education: A best evidence medical education (BEME) systematic review: BEME Guide No. 58
    Gordon, Morris
    Gupta, Simon
    Thornton, Debra
    Reid, Michael
    Mallen, Ernie
    Melling, Angela
    MEDICAL TEACHER, 2020, 42 (01) : 4 - 16
  • [2] The educational effects of portfolios on undergraduate student learning: A Best Evidence Medical Education (BEME) systematic review. BEME Guide No. 11
    Buckley, Sharon
    Coleman, Jamie
    Davison, Ian
    Khan, Khalid S.
    Zamora, Javier
    Malick, Sadia
    Morley, David
    Pollard, David
    Ashcroft, Tamasine
    Popovic, Celia
    Sayers, Jayne
    MEDICAL TEACHER, 2009, 31 (04) : 340 - 355
  • [3] A BEME systematic review of UK undergraduate medical education in the general practice setting: BEME Guide No. 32
    Park, Sophie
    Khan, Nada F.
    Hampshire, Mandy
    Knox, Richard
    Malpass, Alice
    Thomas, James
    Anagnostelis, Betsy
    Newman, Mark
    Bower, Peter
    Rosenthal, Joe
    Murray, Elizabeth
    Iliffe, Steve
    Heneghan, Carl
    Band, Amanda
    Georgieva, Zoya
    MEDICAL TEACHER, 2015, 37 (07) : 611 - 630
  • [4] The effectiveness of case-based learning in health professional education. A BEME systematic review: BEME Guide No. 23
    Thistlethwaite, Jill Elizabeth
    Davies, David
    Ekeocha, Samilia
    Kidd, Jane M.
    MacDougall, Colin
    Matthews, Paul
    Purkis, Judith
    Clay, Diane
    MEDICAL TEACHER, 2012, 34 (06) : E421 - E444
  • [5] Tools for structured team communication in pre-registration health professions education: a Best Evidence Medical Education (BEME) review: BEME Guide No. 41
    Buckley, Sharon
    Ambrose, Lucy
    Anderson, Elizabeth
    Coleman, Jamie J.
    Hensman, Marianne
    Hirsch, Christine
    Hodson, James
    Morley, David
    Pittaway, Sarah
    Stewart, Jonathan
    MEDICAL TEACHER, 2016, 38 (10) : 966 - 980
  • [6] Structure and impact of longitudinal Graduate Medical Education curricula designed to prepare future clinician-educators: A systematic scoping review: BEME Guide No. 74
    Yang, Yihan
    Gielissen, Katherine
    Brown, Bryan
    Spak, Judy M.
    Windish, Donna M.
    MEDICAL TEACHER, 2022, 44 (09) : 947 - 961