Accurate and Interpretable Machine Learning for Transparent Pricing of Health Insurance Plans

被引:0
|
作者
Kshirsagar, Rohun [1 ]
Hsu, Li-Yen [1 ]
Greenberg, Charles H. [1 ]
McClelland, Matthew [1 ]
Mohan, Anushadevi [1 ]
Shende, Wideet [1 ]
Tilmans, Nicolas P. [1 ]
Guo, Min [1 ]
Chheda, Ankit [1 ]
Trotter, Meredith [1 ]
Ray, Shonket [1 ]
Alvarado, Miguel [1 ]
机构
[1] Lumiata Data Sci & Engn, San Mateo, CA 94402 USA
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
Health insurance companies cover half of the United States population through commercial employer-sponsored health plans and pay 1.2 trillion US dollars every year to cover medical expenses for their members. The actuary and underwriter roles at a health insurance company serve to assess which risks to take on and how to price those risks to ensure profitability of the organization. While Bayesian hierarchical models are the current standard in the industry to estimate risk, interest in machine learning as a way to improve upon these existing methods is increasing. Lumiata, a healthcare analytics company, ran a study with a large health insurance company in the United States. We evaluated the ability of machine learning models to predict the per member per month cost of employer groups in their next renewal period, especially those groups who will cost less than 95% of what an actuarial model predicts (groups with "concession opportunities"). We developed a sequence of two models, an individual patient-level and an employer-group-level model, to predict the annual per member per month allowed amount for employer groups, based on a population of 14 million patients. Our models performed 20% better than the insurance carrier's existing pricing model, and identified 84% of the concession opportunities. This study demonstrates the application of a machine learning system to compute an accurate and fair price for health insurance products and analyzes how explainable machine learning models can exceed actuarial models' predictive accuracy while maintaining interpretability.
引用
收藏
页码:15127 / 15136
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Interpretable machine learning with reject option
    Brinkrolf, Johannes
    Hammer, Barbara
    AT-AUTOMATISIERUNGSTECHNIK, 2018, 66 (04) : 283 - 290
  • [42] A Survey of Interpretable Machine Learning Methods
    Wang, Yan
    Tuerhong, Gulanbaier
    2022 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON VIRTUAL REALITY, HUMAN-COMPUTER INTERACTION AND ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, VRHCIAI, 2022, : 232 - 237
  • [43] Interpretable discovery of semiconductors with machine learning
    Hitarth Choubisa
    Petar Todorović
    Joao M. Pina
    Darshan H. Parmar
    Ziliang Li
    Oleksandr Voznyy
    Isaac Tamblyn
    Edward H. Sargent
    npj Computational Materials, 9
  • [44] Machine learning based methods for ratemaking health care insurance
    Ben Hamida, Amal
    Kacem, Manel
    de Peretti, Christian
    Belkacem, Lotfi
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MARKET RESEARCH, 2024, 66 (06) : 810 - 831
  • [45] Advanced Machine Learning Techniques for Predictive Analysis of Health Insurance
    Prova, Nuzhat Noor Islam
    2024 SECOND INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INTELLIGENT CYBER PHYSICAL SYSTEMS AND INTERNET OF THINGS, ICOICI 2024, 2024, : 1166 - 1170
  • [46] Machine Learning for Digital Shadow Design in Health Insurance Sector
    Rodriguez-Aguilar, Roman
    Marmolejo-Suacedo, Jose-Antonio
    Rodriguez-Aguilar, Miriam
    Marmolejo-Saucedo, Liliana
    MOBILE NETWORKS & APPLICATIONS, 2024, 29 (01): : 221 - 234
  • [47] Judicialization of private health plans and insurance
    Aith, Fernando
    Scheffer, Mario Cesar
    REVISTA DE DIREITO SANITARIO-JOURNAL OF HEALTH LAW, 2022, 22 (01):
  • [48] Dominated Options in Health Insurance Plans
    Liu, Chenyuan
    Sydnor, Justin
    AMERICAN ECONOMIC JOURNAL-ECONOMIC POLICY, 2022, 14 (01) : 277 - 300
  • [49] Interpretable machine learning for perturbation biology
    Shen, Judy
    Yuan, Bo
    Luna, Augustin
    Korkut, Anil
    Marks, Debora
    Ingraham, John
    Sander, Chris
    CANCER RESEARCH, 2020, 80 (16)
  • [50] Conceptual challenges for interpretable machine learning
    David S. Watson
    Synthese, 2022, 200