Resilience, burnout and coping mechanisms in UK doctors: a cross-sectional study

被引:117
作者
McKinley, Nicola [1 ,2 ]
McCain, R. Scott [1 ]
Convie, Liam [1 ,2 ]
Clarke, Mike [3 ]
Dempster, Martin [4 ]
Campbell, William Jeffrey [1 ]
Kirk, Stephen James [1 ]
机构
[1] Ulster Hosp, Gen Surg, Dundonald, England
[2] Queens Univ Belfast, Ctr Publ Hlth, Belfast, Antrim, North Ireland
[3] Queens Univ Belfast, Northern Ireland Methodol Hub, Belfast, Antrim, North Ireland
[4] Queens Univ Belfast, Sch Psychol, Belfast, Antrim, North Ireland
关键词
resilience; burnout; doctor; physician; clinician; psychological well-being; COMPASSION SATISFACTION; LIFE; PROFESSIONALS; PHYSICIANS; MEDICINE; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1136/bmjopen-2019-031765
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Aims This cross-sectional study aimed to assess resilience, professional quality of life and coping mechanisms in UK doctors. It also aimed to assess the impact of demographic variables, such as sex, grade and specialty on these factors. Methods During October and November 2018, medical doctors in the UK were eligible to complete an online survey made up of validated psychological instruments. Royal Colleges and other medical organisations invited their membership to participate via newsletters, email invitations, websites and social media. Results 1651 doctors participated from a wide range of specialties and grades across the UK. The mean resilience score was 65.01 (SD 12.3), lower than population norms. Of those who responded, 31.5% had high burnout (BO), 26.2% had high secondary traumatic stress and 30.7% had low compassion satisfaction (CS). Doctors who responded from emergency medicine were more burned out than any other specialty group (F=2.62, p=0.001, df 14). Those who responded from general practice scored lowest for CS (F=6.43, p<0.001, df 14). 120 (8%) doctors met the criteria for all three of high BO, high STS and low CS. The most frequently reported coping mechanism was the maladaptive strategy of self-distraction. Conclusions One-third of UK doctors who responded are burned out and suffering from STS. Those who responded from emergency medicine and general practice appear to be suffering the most. Over 100 doctors fell into the at-risk category of high BO, high STS and low CS. Future analysis of the free text responses from doctors may help to identify factors that are playing a role in the high levels of BO and STS being reported by medical staff.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 34 条
[1]   Degrees of resilience: profiling psychological resilience and prospective academic achievement in university inductees [J].
Allan, John F. ;
McKenna, Jim ;
Dominey, Susan .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF GUIDANCE & COUNSELLING, 2014, 42 (01) :9-25
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2016, J BIOMED ED
[3]  
[Anonymous], BMJ BRIT MED J
[4]  
Baird B., 2016, KINGS FUND
[5]   You want to measure coping but your protocol's too long: Consider the brief COPE [J].
Carver, CS .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF BEHAVIORAL MEDICINE, 1997, 4 (01) :92-100
[6]   Development of a new resilience scale: The Connor-Davidson Resilience scale (CD-RISC) [J].
Connor, KM ;
Davidson, JRT .
DEPRESSION AND ANXIETY, 2003, 18 (02) :76-82
[7]   A survey of resilience, burnout, and tolerance of uncertainty in Australian general practice registrars [J].
Cooke, Georga P. E. ;
Doust, Jenny A. ;
Steele, Michael C. .
BMC MEDICAL EDUCATION, 2013, 13 :2
[8]   The relationship between workplace violence, perceptions of safety, and Professional Quality of Life among emergency department staff members in a Level 1 Trauma Centre [J].
Copeland, Darcy ;
Henry, Melissa .
INTERNATIONAL EMERGENCY NURSING, 2018, 39 :26-32
[9]  
Costa G, 2013, MED LAV, V104, P251
[10]  
Eley DS, 2015, RURAL REMOTE HEALTH, V15