Facilitators and barriers to participation in population-based colorectal cancer screening programme from the perspective of healthcare professionals: Qualitative research study

被引:3
作者
Unanue-Arza, Saloa [1 ]
Portillo, Isabel [2 ,3 ]
Idigoras, Isabel [2 ,3 ]
Arostegui, Inmaculada [4 ,5 ,6 ]
Arana-Arri, Eunate [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Basque Country UPV EHU, Fac Med & Nursing, Dept Nursing, Leioa 48940, Spain
[2] Osakidetza, Basque Hlth Serv, Basque Country Colorectal Canc Screening Programm, Bilbao, Spain
[3] Biocruces Hlth Res Inst, Baracaldo, Spain
[4] Univ Basque Country UPV EHU, Fac Sci & Technol, Dept Appl Math Stat & Operat Res, Leioa, Spain
[5] Basque Ctr Appl Math BCAM, Bilbao, Spain
[6] Red Invest Serv Sanitarios & Enfermedades Cron RE, Madrid, Spain
关键词
administrative personnel; colorectal cancer; health personnel; mass screening; patient participation; primary health care; MORTALITY; IMPACT; RECOMMENDATION; ADHERENCE; ATTITUDES;
D O I
10.1111/ecc.13507
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Objective High participation determines the success of colorectal cancer screening programmes in reducing incidence and mortality. The factors that determine participation must be studied from the perspective of professionals that implement the programme. The aim was to identify factors that facilitate or hinder the participation of the invited people in the bowel cancer screening programme of the Basque Country (Spain) from professional's perspective. Methods Qualitative design based on individual interviews and focus groups. Thirty-eight primary care professionals who implement the programme participated (administrative staff, nurses and general practitioners). Thematic analysis was performed. Results Professionals show high satisfaction with the programme, and they believe firmly in its benefits. Facilitators for participation include professionals' commitment to the programme, their previous positive experiences, their optimistic attitude towards the prognosis of cancer and their trust in the health system and accessibility. Barriers include invitees' lack of independence to make decisions, fear of a positive test result and patient vulnerability and labour mobility of the health professionals. Conclusions Professionals show a high degree of involvement and identify primary care is an appropriate place to carry out disease prevention. They identify the closeness to patients, the personal attitude and the characteristics of the health system as key factors that influence participation.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 36 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1995, Qualitative Research Methods for Health Professionals
[2]   Obstacles to colorectal screening in general practice: a qualitative study of GPs and patients [J].
Aubin-Auger, Isabelle ;
Mercier, Alain ;
Lebeau, Jean-Pierre ;
Baumann, Laurence ;
Peremans, Lieve ;
Van Royen, Paul .
FAMILY PRACTICE, 2011, 28 (06) :670-676
[3]   Factors related to longitudinal adherence in colorectal cancer screening: qualitative research findings [J].
Benito, Llucia ;
Farre, Albert ;
Binefa, Gemma ;
Vidal, Carmen ;
Cardona, Angels ;
Pla, Margarita ;
Garcia, Montse .
CANCER CAUSES & CONTROL, 2018, 29 (01) :103-114
[4]   European Code Against Cancer and scientific justification: third version (2003) [J].
Boyle, P ;
Autier, P ;
Bartelink, H ;
Baselga, J ;
Boffetta, P ;
Burn, J ;
Burns, HJG ;
Christensen, L ;
Denis, L ;
Dicato, M ;
Diehl, V ;
Doll, R ;
Franceschi, S ;
Gillis, CR ;
Gray, N ;
Griciute, L ;
Hackshaw, A ;
Kasler, M ;
Kogevinas, M ;
Kvinnsland, S ;
La Vecchia, C ;
Levi, F ;
McVie, JG ;
Maisonneuve, P ;
Martin-Moreno, JM ;
Bishop, JN ;
Oleari, F ;
Perrin, P ;
Quinn, M ;
Richards, M ;
Ringborg, U ;
Scully, C ;
Siracka, E ;
Storm, H ;
Tubiana, M ;
Tursz, T ;
Veronesi, U ;
Wald, N ;
Weber, W ;
Zaridze, DG ;
Zatonski, W ;
zur Hausen, H .
ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2003, 14 (07) :973-1005
[5]   Association between socioeconomic deprivation and colorectal cancer screening outcomes: Low uptake rates among the most and least deprived people [J].
Buron, Andrea ;
Auge, Josep M. ;
Sala, Maria ;
Roman, Marta ;
Castells, Antoni ;
Macia, Francesc ;
Comas, Merce ;
Guiriguet, Carolina ;
Bessa, Xavier ;
Castells, Xavier .
PLOS ONE, 2017, 12 (06)
[6]   Methods to increase participation in organised screening programs: a systematic review [J].
Camilloni, Laura ;
Ferroni, Eliana ;
Cendales, Beatriz Jimenez ;
Pezzarossi, Annamaria ;
Furnari, Giacomo ;
Borgia, Piero ;
Guasticchi, Gabriella ;
Rossi, Paolo Giorgi .
BMC PUBLIC HEALTH, 2013, 13
[7]   Comparison of Uptake of Colorectal Cancer Screening Based on Fecal Immunochemical Testing (FIT) in Males and Females: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis [J].
Clarke, Nicholas ;
Sharp, Linda ;
Osborne, Aoife ;
Kearney, Patricia M. .
CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY BIOMARKERS & PREVENTION, 2015, 24 (01) :39-47
[8]   The view from two sides: a qualitative study of community and medical perspectives on screening for colorectal cancer using FOBT [J].
Clavarino, AM ;
Janda, M ;
Hughes, KL ;
Del Mar, C ;
Tong, SL ;
Stanton, WR ;
Aitken, JF ;
Leggett, BA ;
Newman, B .
PREVENTIVE MEDICINE, 2004, 39 (03) :482-490
[9]   FOBT Completion in FQHCs: Impact of Physician Recommendation, FOBT Information, or Receipt of the FOBT Kit [J].
Davis, Terry C. ;
Arnold, Connie L. ;
Rademaker, Alfred W. ;
Platt, Daci J. ;
Esparza, Julia ;
Liu, Dachao ;
Wolf, Michael S. .
JOURNAL OF RURAL HEALTH, 2012, 28 (03) :306-311
[10]   General practitioners' perceptions of population based bowel screening and their influence on practice: a qualitative study [J].
Dawson, Greer ;
Crane, Melanie ;
Lyons, Claudine ;
Burnham, Anna ;
Bowman, Tara ;
Perez, Donna ;
Travaglia, Joanne .
BMC FAMILY PRACTICE, 2017, 18