Socially optimal forest management and biodiversity conservation in temperate forests under climate change

被引:29
作者
Augustynczik, Andrey Lessa Derci [1 ]
Gutsch, Martin [3 ]
Basile, Marco [2 ]
Suckow, Felicitas [3 ]
Lasch, Petra [3 ]
Yousefpour, Rasoul [1 ]
Hanewinkel, Marc [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Freiburg, Chair Forestry Econ & Forest Planning, Tennenbacherstr 4, D-79106 Freiburg, Germany
[2] Univ Freiburg, Chair Wildlife Ecol & Management, Tennenbacherstr 4, D-79106 Freiburg, Germany
[3] Potsdam Inst Klimafolgenforsch eV PIK, Telegrafenberg A31, D-14473 Potsdam, Germany
关键词
Forest biodiversity; Ecosystem services; Forest planning; Climate change; Optimal taxation; WILLINGNESS-TO-PAY; ECOSYSTEM SERVICES; ECONOMIC VALUATION; PAYMENTS; DIVERSIFICATION; DISTURBANCES; PRODUCTIVITY; CONTRACTS; PROVISION; TOLERANT;
D O I
10.1016/j.ecolecon.2019.106504
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
Forest biodiversity underpins social welfare by preserving ecosystem multifunctionality and the provision of ecosystem goods and services. Still, the social value of biodiversity is not adequately incorporated into forest management and decision support models. This study proposes a novel approach for defining socially optimal biodiversity levels, wood supply and taxation schemes under climate change. We developed a partial equilibrium model to maximize consumers' and producers' surplus until the end of the century, including climate change impacts as productivity shocks in a coupled ecological-economic framework. In our model, we consider a first-best and a second-best taxation scheme to internalize the value of forest biodiversity into forest planning. The framework developed here was applied to a temperate forest landscape in southwestern Germany, where biodiversity has a high social value. Our results indicate an increasing consumption of wood and supply of biodiversity (up to 38.4 %) until the end of the century. Moreover, climate change may affect forest productivity, optimal harvesting rates and taxation schemes. Crucially, current management is unable to capture the adequate social value of biodiversity and is inefficient under climate change. Policy mechanisms are therefore required to correct biodiversity provision in temperate forest landscapes.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 64 条
[1]  
Aerts Raf, 2011, BMC Ecology, V11, P29, DOI 10.1186/1472-6785-11-29
[2]  
Amachers GS, 2009, ECONOMICS OF FOREST RESOURCES, P1
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2005, ECOSYSTEMS HUMAN WEL
[4]   Diversification of forest management regimes secures tree microhabitats and bird abundance under climate change [J].
Augustynczik, Andrey Lessa Derci ;
Asbeck, Thomas ;
Basile, Marco ;
Bauhus, Juergen ;
Storch, Ilse ;
Mikusinski, Grzegorz ;
Yousefpour, Rasoul ;
Hanewinkel, Marc .
SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2019, 650 :2717-2730
[5]  
Balestrieri R, 2017, ACTA ORNITHOL, V52, P1, DOI [10.3161/00016454AO2017.52.1.001, 10.3161/00016454ao2017.52.1.001]
[6]   Capturing the complexity of biodiversity: A critical review of economic valuation studies of biological diversity [J].
Bartkowski, Bartosz ;
Lienhoop, Nele ;
Hansjuergens, Bernd .
ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2015, 113 :1-14
[7]   The insurance value of biodiversity in the provision of ecosystem services [J].
Baumgaertner, Stefan .
NATURAL RESOURCE MODELING, 2007, 20 (01) :87-127
[8]   Income inequality and willingness to pay for environmental public goods [J].
Baumgaertner, Stefan ;
Drupp, Moritz A. ;
Meya, Jasper N. ;
Munz, Jan M. ;
Quaas, Martin F. .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT, 2017, 85 :35-61
[9]   Managing increasing environmental risks through agrobiodiversity and agrienvironmental policies [J].
Baumgaertner, Stefan ;
Quaas, Martin F. .
AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 2010, 41 (05) :483-496
[10]   Thresholds in forest bird occurrence as a function of the amount of early-seral broadleaf forest at landscape scales [J].
Betts, M. G. ;
Hagar, J. C. ;
Rivers, J. W. ;
Alexander, J. D. ;
McGarigal, K. ;
McComb, B. C. .
ECOLOGICAL APPLICATIONS, 2010, 20 (08) :2116-2130