Wear of nanofilled dental composites at varying filler concentrations

被引:30
作者
Lawson, Nathaniel C. [1 ]
Burgess, John O. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Alabama Birmingham, Sch Dent, Dept Clin & Community Sci, Div Biomat, Birmingham, AL 35294 USA
关键词
wear; nanocomposite; flexural strength; hardness; modulus; RESIN COMPOSITES; MECHANICAL-PROPERTIES; 2-BODY WEAR; SIZE; CLASSIFICATION; RESTORATIVES; HARDNESS; SYSTEMS;
D O I
10.1002/jbm.b.33212
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
0831 ;
摘要
The aim of this study is to examine the effects of nanofiller concentration on the mechanisms of wear of a dental composite. Nanofilled composites were fabricated with a bisphenol A glycidyl methacrylate polymer and 40 nm SiO2 filler particles at three filler loads (25, 50, and 65 wt %). The elastic modulus, flexural strength, and hardness of the composites and the unfilled resin were measured. The materials (n=8) were tested in the modified wear testing device at 50,000, 100,000, and 200,000 cycles with 20N force at 1 Hz. A 33% glycerine lubricant and stainless steel antagonist were used. The worn composite and antagonist surfaces were analyzed with noncontact profilometry and SEM. The volumetric wear data indicated that there are significant differences between filler concentrations and cycles (p<0.05). A trend was noted that increasing filler content beyond 25% decreased the wear resistance of the composites. Increasing filler content increased hardness and modulus and increased flexural strength up to 50% fill. SEM evaluation of the worn specimens indicated that the resin and 25% filled materials exhibited cracking and failed by fatigue and the 50 and 65% filled materials exhibited microcutting and failed by abrasive wear. Based on the results of this study, composite manufacturers are recommended to use a filler concentration between 25 and 50% when using nanosized filler particles. (c) 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Biomed Mater Res Part B: Appl Biomater, 103B: 424-429, 2015.
引用
收藏
页码:424 / 429
页数:6
相关论文
共 31 条
[2]  
Chinelatti Michelle Alexandra, 2006, J. Appl. Oral Sci., V14, P188
[3]   Nanoindentation of dental composites [J].
Drummond, James L. .
JOURNAL OF BIOMEDICAL MATERIALS RESEARCH PART B-APPLIED BIOMATERIALS, 2006, 78B (01) :27-34
[4]   Two-year clinical performance of a nanofiller vs a fine-particle hybrid resin composite [J].
Ernst, Claus-Peter ;
Brandenbusch, Mathias ;
Meyer, Gerrit ;
Canbek, Kerem ;
Gottschalk, Franziska ;
Willershausen, Brita .
CLINICAL ORAL INVESTIGATIONS, 2006, 10 (02) :119-125
[5]   Resin composite-State of the art [J].
Ferracane, Jack L. .
DENTAL MATERIALS, 2011, 27 (01) :29-38
[6]   Investigation of Mechanical Properties of Experimental Bis-GMA/TEGDMA Dental Composite Resins Containing Various Mass Fractions of Silica Nanoparticles [J].
Hosseinalipour, Mohammad ;
Javadpour, Jafar ;
Rezaie, Hamidreza ;
Dadras, Taimaz ;
Hayati, Amir Nemati .
JOURNAL OF PROSTHODONTICS-IMPLANT ESTHETIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE DENTISTRY, 2010, 19 (02) :112-117
[7]   Influence of filler loading on the two-body wear of a dental composite [J].
Hu, X ;
Marquis, PM ;
Shortall, AC .
JOURNAL OF ORAL REHABILITATION, 2003, 30 (07) :729-737
[8]  
Hutchins HutchingsI., 1992, Tribology, Friction and Wear of Engineering Materials
[9]  
Jorgensen K D, 1978, Quintessence Int Dent Dig, V9, P73
[10]  
JORGENSEN KD, 1979, SCAND J DENT RES, V87, P140