An evaluation of per-parcel land cover mapping using maximum likelihood class probabilities

被引:92
作者
Dean, AM [1 ]
Smith, GM
机构
[1] Univ Durham, Sch Biol & Biomed Sci, Environm Res Ctr, Durham DH1 3LE, England
[2] Ctr Ecol & Hydrol, Sect Earth Observat, Huntingdon PE17 2LS, Cambs, England
关键词
D O I
10.1080/01431160210155910
中图分类号
TP7 [遥感技术];
学科分类号
081102 ; 0816 ; 081602 ; 083002 ; 1404 ;
摘要
The Centre for Ecology and Hydrology (CEH) has recently developed a per-parcel classification procedure which integrates remotely sensed imagery with digital cartography. The aim of the work reported here was to compare the per-parcel approach with a conventional per-pixel classification through examination of maximum likelihood class probabilities. An Airborne Thematic Mapper (ATM) image with 1.25 m spatial resolution was used as a source of training data. The ATM image was spatially degraded to 10 m resolution to form the remotely sensed input and the study area was subdivided into land parcels by manual digitizing. The per-parcel approach extracted raster data from a core area described by a shrunken version of a land parcel, thus eliminating mixed boundary pixels. Boundary pixels were shown to be more variable than the core pixels and their removal improved classification confidence. The per-parcel approach calculated the mean spectral response of the extracted core pixels. This was shown to remove within-parcel variation and improve classification confidence in comparison to per-pixel class allocations. A parcel-based representation was shown to be most appropriate for mapping agricultural land cover in comparison to semi-natural areas, because agricultural landscapes have an inherent parcel structure. When land cover is heterogeneous, as in many semi-natural areas, a per-pixel classification would appear to be more appropriate. A hybrid classifier, which could switch between per-parcel and per-pixel mapping, was suggested as a powerful land cover mapping tool.
引用
收藏
页码:2905 / 2920
页数:16
相关论文
共 16 条
[1]   MAPPING THE RELIABILITY OF SATELLITE-DERIVED LANDCOVER MAPS - AN EXAMPLE FROM THE CENTRAL BRAZILIAN AMAZON BASIN [J].
CORVES, C ;
PLACE, CJ .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF REMOTE SENSING, 1994, 15 (06) :1283-1294
[2]  
ESTES JE, 1994, PHOTOGRAMM ENG REM S, V60, P517
[3]   The pixel: A snare and a delusion [J].
Fisher, P .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF REMOTE SENSING, 1997, 18 (03) :679-685
[4]   THE EVALUATION OF FUZZY MEMBERSHIP OF LAND COVER CLASSES IN THE SUBURBAN ZONE [J].
FISHER, PF ;
PATHIRANA, S .
REMOTE SENSING OF ENVIRONMENT, 1990, 34 (02) :121-132
[5]   Fully fuzzy supervised classification of land cover from remotely sensed imagery with an artificial neural network [J].
Foody, GM .
NEURAL COMPUTING & APPLICATIONS, 1997, 5 (04) :238-247
[6]   CROSS-ENTROPY FOR THE EVALUATION OF THE ACCURACY OF A FUZZY LAND-COVER CLASSIFICATION WITH FUZZY GROUND DATA [J].
FOODY, GM .
ISPRS JOURNAL OF PHOTOGRAMMETRY AND REMOTE SENSING, 1995, 50 (05) :2-12
[7]  
FOODY GM, 1992, PHOTOGRAMM ENG REM S, V58, P1335
[8]  
FULLER RM, 1994, PHOTOGRAMM ENG REM S, V60, P553
[9]   A GRAPHICAL APPROACH FOR THE EVALUATION OF LAND-COVER CLASSIFICATION PROCEDURES [J].
GONG, P ;
HOWARTH, PJ .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF REMOTE SENSING, 1990, 11 (05) :899-905
[10]  
Markham B.L., 1981, P 15 INT S REM SENS, P1075