INTERVENTION EFFECTS OF RURAL DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMME ON LANDSCAPE MANAGEMENT IN BULGARIA

被引:0
|
作者
Teodor, Radev [1 ]
Petar, Borisov [1 ]
Miladinoski, Sofronia [2 ]
机构
[1] Agr Univ, Plovdiv, Bulgaria
[2] Fac Tourism & Hospitality, Ohrid, North Macedonia
关键词
rural development; landscape managemet; Bulgria;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This paper aims to make an evaluation of CAP contribution to landscape management in Bulgarian economy of rural areas. To sum up, landscape is a non-commodity output produced as direct or indirect outcome of the activities operating in a particular area and it is valued by society for its functions (use and non use values, ecological, recreational, cultural etc). Due to this complex nature, it produces second-order effects that are captured by the stakeholders in rural areas (farmers or others), and that generate potential markets for new activities. Therefore, through the generation of these effects, landscape contributes to boosting the economy of rural areas and is an important driver for the whole regional economy. The Rural Development Programmes of the current period (2007-2013) support measures that can have an added value for this new perspective of the policy. Some of them such as the agri-environmental payments and the measures designed for less favoured areas can have direct and indirect effects in the provision of landscape and in delivering landscape as environmental public good, playing also an important role in terms of financial allocation in the current Rural Development Programme.
引用
收藏
页码:64 / 75
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Empowering Rural Development in Urbanizing China: A Government Intervention Perspective
    Liu, Shuang
    Chen, Chen
    JOURNAL OF REGIONAL AND CITY PLANNING, 2021, 32 (02): : 110 - 129
  • [22] Landscape multifuncionality evaluation as a subsidy to public policies for sustainable rural development
    Loch, Carlos
    May Rebollar, Paola Beatriz
    Zanardo Rosenfeldt, Yuzi Anai
    Walkoski, Marines
    CIENCIA RURAL, 2015, 45 (01): : 171 - 177
  • [23] Dilemmas in agricultural and rural development in Hungary:: The EU accession partnership and the SAPARD programme
    Baukó, T
    Gurzó, I
    EUROPEAN URBAN AND REGIONAL STUDIES, 2001, 8 (04) : 361 - 369
  • [24] COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS FOR ROMANIA AND BULGARIA REGARDING THE ABSORPTION RATE OF EUROPEAN FUNDS FOR AGRICULTURE AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT
    Radulescu, Carmen Valentina
    Istudor, Nicolae
    Petrescu, Irina Elena
    CRISES AFTER THE CRISIS: INQUIRIES FROM A NATIONAL, EUROPEAN AND GLOBAL PERSPECTIVE, VOL I, 2011, : 557 - 565
  • [25] THE ROLE OF COMMUNICATION MANAGEMENT IN THE DEVELOPMENT OF RURAL AREAS
    Dasic, Dejan
    Vitkovic, Biljana
    Borojevic, Krstan
    EKONOMIKA POLJOPRIVREDA-ECONOMICS OF AGRICULTURE, 2024, 71 (04): : 1421 - 1435
  • [26] MANAGEMENT OF AGRICULTURAL AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT IN THE REPUBLIC OF SERBIA
    Ristic, Lela
    XIV INTERNATIONAL MAY CONFERENCE ON STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT, VOL XIV, ISSUE (1) (2018), 2018, 14 (01): : 13 - 23
  • [27] Transforming Algeria's rural areas through STI and the knowledge economy: the proximity programme for integrated rural development (PPDRI)
    Djeflat, Abdelkader
    INNOVATION AND DEVELOPMENT, 2020, 10 (02) : 187 - 206
  • [28] Regional impacts of the EU Rural Development Programme: Poland's food processing sector
    Michalek, Jerzy
    Ciaian, Pavel
    Di Marcantonio, Federica
    REGIONAL STUDIES, 2020, 54 (10) : 1389 - 1401
  • [29] Representativeness and civic participation in rural development programmes The case of the PRODER programme in Galicia, Spain
    Mar Perez-Fra, M.
    Lopez-Iglesias, Edelmiro
    Garcia-Arias, Ana I.
    Sineiro, Francisco
    Lorenzana, Roberto
    OUTLOOK ON AGRICULTURE, 2012, 41 (03) : 215 - 220
  • [30] Decentralization and rural development policies effectiveness: a quasi-experimental evaluation of the LEADER programme
    Aubert, Francis
    Frere, Quentin
    Lepicier, Denis
    Vedrine, Lionel
    REGIONAL STUDIES, 2022,