From Knowledge to Meaning: User-centered Product Architecture Framework Comparison between OMUKE and SAPAD

被引：0
作者：
Hu, Fei [1 ]
Sato, Keiichi [2 ]
Zhou, Kun [1 ]
Teeravarunyou, Sakol [2 ]
机构：
[1] Guangdong Univ Technol, Sch Art & Design, 729 Dongfengdong Rd, Guangzhou, Guangdong, Peoples R China
[2] IIT, Inst Design, 350 N LaSalle St, Chicago, IL 60610 USA
来源：
PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2016 INTERNATIONAL FORUM ON MANAGEMENT, EDUCATION AND INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY APPLICATION | 2016年 / 47卷
关键词：
Product Architecture; OMUKE; SAPAD; User Knowledge; Meaning;
D O I：
暂无
中图分类号：
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号：
0812 ;
摘要：
This paper analyzes the methods of Object-Mediated User Knowledge Elicitation (OMUKE) and Semiotic Approach to Product Architecture Design (SAPAD). OMUKE clearly shows the relationship from behavior to object and from the relationship between task (behavior) and the use, user knowledge is analyzed. SAPAD analyzes the mapping between behavior, signification and product, and explore product architecture from the perspective of signification. Comparing the two research frameworks, it proposes that object system is similar, but the signification system is totally difference.
引用
收藏
页码：877 / 885
页数：9
相关论文
共 17 条
  • [1] Cook A. M., 1996, BUILDING ENTERPRISE, P101
  • [2] Cooper Alan, 2005, FACE 2 0 ESSENTIALS
  • [3] Courage C., 2004, UNDERSTANDING YOUR U, V1st
  • [4] Hofmeister C., 2000, AW OBJ TECHNOL S, P9
  • [5] Hubka V, 1988, THEORY TECHNICAL SYS, P36
  • [6] Jacobson I., 1992, Object-Oriented Software Engineering-A Use Case Driven Approach
  • [7] Jiao J., 1998, THESIS, P45
  • [8] Kuniavsky Mike, 2003, Observing the User Experience: A Practitioner's Guide to User Research
  • [9] Otto K. N., 2001, PRODUCT DESIGN TECHN, P175
  • [10] ROSEN DW, 1996, ASME DES ENG TECHN C
12