Patient Complaints With Primary Versus Revision Rhinoplasty: Analysis and Practice Implications

Background: Rhinoplasty patients often present with specific concerns and are frequently exacting in their demands and expectations of the surgical experience. Objectives: The authors assess the presenting complaints expressed during the rhinoplasty consultation process and compare the presentations of primary versus revision rhinoplasty patients. Methods: A retrospective review of 400 consecutive rhinoplasty patients was performed. Demographic information and patient concerns regarding nasal appearance and function were recorded. Complaint frequencies (as well as rank order) were compared between primary and revision patients. Statistically significant associations were compared in more detail through logistic regression models. Results: Primary rhinoplasty patients were significantly more likely to cite "too large" and "dorsal hump" as motivating concerns. Conversely, revision rhinoplasty patients were far more likely to cite concern regarding a "crooked nose," " tip asymmetry," " wide or large nostrils," " dorsal sloop," and "columellar show." Revision rhinoplasty patients also complained of issues such as " alar retraction," "pointy tip," and " nasal scarring," which were almost negligible in frequency in the primary rhinoplasty group. Conclusions: Patients presenting for primary rhinoplasty commonly seek a smaller, more refined nasal appearance. Patients with prior rhinoplasty operations are far more likely to raise concern regarding crookedness or asymmetries. By comparing the presentations of primary and revision rhinoplasty patients-and delineating the common indications for revision operations-novice rhinoplasty surgeons may be able to avoid certain pitfalls at the outset, thereby reducing their revision rates. The data may also assist surgeons in developing a more targeted approach to the consultation process in the revision setting.