Raindrop size distribution: Fitting performance of common theoretical models

被引:37
作者
Adirosi, E. [1 ]
Volpi, E. [2 ]
Lombardo, F. [2 ]
Baldini, L. [1 ]
机构
[1] Natl Res Council Italy CNR, Inst Atmospher Sci & Climate ISAC, Rome, Italy
[2] Univ Roma Tre, Dipartimento Ingn, Rome, Italy
关键词
Drop size distribution; Maximum likelihood method; Kolmogorov-Smirnov test; Model selection; 2-DIMENSIONAL VIDEO DISDROMETER; MOMENT ESTIMATORS; POLARIMETRIC RADAR; TERMINAL VELOCITY; WATER-DROPS; PARAMETERS; RAINFALL; PRECIPITATION; SPECTRA; STRATIFORM;
D O I
10.1016/j.advwatres.2016.07.010
中图分类号
TV21 [水资源调查与水利规划];
学科分类号
081501 ;
摘要
Modelling raindrop size distribution (DSD) is a fundamental issue to connect remote sensing observations with reliable precipitation products for hydrological applications. To date, various standard probability distributions have been proposed to build DSD models. Relevant questions to ask indeed are how often and how good such models fit empirical data, given that the advances in both data availability and technology used to estimate DSDs have allowed many of the deficiencies of early analyses to be mitigated. Therefore, we present a comprehensive follow-up of a previous study on the comparison of statistical fitting of three common DSD models against 2D-Video Distrometer (2DVD) data, which are unique in that the size of individual drops is determined accurately. By maximum likelihood method, we fit models based on lognormal, gamma and Weibull distributions to more than 42.000 1-minute drop-by-drop data taken from the field campaigns of the NASA Ground Validation program of the Global Precipitation Measurement (GPM) mission. In order to check the adequacy between the models and the measured data, we investigate the goodness of fit of each distribution using the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test. Then, we apply a specific model selection technique to evaluate the relative quality of each model. Results show that the gamma distribution has the lowest KS rejection rate, while the Weibull distribution is the most frequently rejected. Ranking for each minute the statistical models that pass the KS test, it can be argued that the probability distributions whose tails are exponentially bounded, i.e. light-tailed distributions, seem to be adequate to model the natural variability of DSDs. However, in line with our previous study, we also found that frequency distributions of empirical. DSDs could be heavy-tailed in a number of cases, which may result in severe uncertainty in estimating statistical moments and bulk variables. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:290 / 305
页数:16
相关论文
共 97 条
[1]   Improvement of vertical profiles of raindrop size distribution from micro rain radar using 2D video disdrometer measurements [J].
Adirosi, E. ;
Baldini, L. ;
Roberto, N. ;
Gatlin, P. ;
Tokay, A. .
ATMOSPHERIC RESEARCH, 2016, 169 :404-415
[2]   Comparison of different fittings of drop spectra for rainfall retrievals [J].
Adirosi, E. ;
Baldini, L. ;
Lombardo, F. ;
Russo, F. ;
Napolitano, F. ;
Volpi, E. ;
Tokay, A. .
ADVANCES IN WATER RESOURCES, 2015, 83 :55-67
[3]   Evaluation of Gamma Raindrop Size Distribution Assumption through Comparison of Rain Rates of Measured and Radar-Equivalent Gamma DSD [J].
Adirosi, Elisa ;
Gorgucci, Eugenio ;
Baldini, Luca ;
Tokay, Ali .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED METEOROLOGY AND CLIMATOLOGY, 2014, 53 (06) :1618-1635
[4]   Measurement uncertainty in rainfall kinetic energy and intensity relationships for soil erosion studies: An evaluation using PARSIVEL disdrometers in the Southern Appalachian Mountains [J].
Angulo-Martinez, M. ;
Barros, A. P. .
GEOMORPHOLOGY, 2015, 228 :28-40
[5]  
[Anonymous], 1983, The Wadsworth statistics/Probability series
[6]  
ATLAS D, 1977, J APPL METEOROL, V16, P1322, DOI 10.1175/1520-0450(1977)016<1322:PAAIRM>2.0.CO
[7]  
2
[8]   DOPPLER RADAR CHARACTERISTICS OF PRECIPITATION AT VERTICAL INCIDENCE [J].
ATLAS, D ;
SRIVASTAVA, RC ;
SEKHON, RS .
REVIEWS OF GEOPHYSICS, 1973, 11 (01) :1-35
[9]  
Awang M.A., 2004, RF MICR C 2004 RFM 2
[10]  
Beard K. V., 1985, Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology, V2, P468, DOI 10.1175/1520-0426(1985)002<0468:SAATRV>2.0.CO