Efficacy of Nasal Cannula Oxygen as a Preoxygenation Adjunct in Emergency Airway Management

被引:41
作者
Hayes-Bradley, Clare [1 ]
Lewis, Anthony [2 ]
Burns, Brian [1 ,3 ]
Miller, Matt [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] New South Wales Ambulance, Greater Sydney Area Helicopter Emergency Med Serv, Retrieval Med, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[2] St George Hosp, Dept Anaesthesia, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[3] Univ Sydney, Sydney Med Sch, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
关键词
ANESTHESIA;
D O I
10.1016/j.annemergmed.2015.11.012
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Study objective: Although preoxygenation for emergency airway management is usually performed with nonrebreather face masks or bag-valve-mask devices, some clinicians also deliver supplemental high-flow oxygen by nasal cannula. We aim to measure the efficacy of supplemental nasal cannula oxygen delivery to conventional bag-valve-mask and nonrebreather face mask preoxygenation both with and without a simulated face mask leak. Methods: We conducted a randomized crossover trial using healthy volunteers. We randomized subjects to preoxygenation with bag-valve-mask or nonrebreather face mask. In random sequence, subjects underwent 3-minute trials of preoxygenation with oxygen through mask alone at 15 L/min, oxygen through mask at 15 L/min with standardized leak, oxygen through mask at 15 L/mind-oxygen through nasal cannula at 10 L/min, and oxygen through mask at 15 L/min-Foxygen through nasal cannula at 10 L/min with standardized leak. The primaryoutcome was single-breath exhalation end-tidal oxygen (Ero(2)). We compared Ero(2) between preoxygenation modalities, using nonparametric techniques. Results: We enrolled 60 subjects (30 nonrebreather face mask and 30 bag-valve-mask). In scenarios without a mask leak, Ero(2) was similar between bag-valve-mask and bag-valve-mask-Enasal cannula (mean 79% versus 75%; difference -3%; 95% confidence interval [Cl] -8% to 1%). In bag-valve-mask scenarios with a mask leak, Ero2 was higher for bag-valve-mask-Enasal cannula than bag-valve-mask alone (mean 66% versus 41%; difference 25%; 95% Cl 21% to 29%). Ero2 was higher for nonrebreather face mask+nasal cannula than nonrebreather face mask (mean 67% versus 52%; difference 15%; 95% Cl 12% to 18%). In nonrebreather face mask scenarios with a mask leak, Ero2 was higher for nonrebreather face mask-Enasal cannula than nonrebreather face mask (mean 65% versus 48%; difference 17%; 95% CI 13% to 20%). Conclusion: Although not aiding bag-valve-mask preoxygenation with a good mask seal, supplemental nasal cannula oxygen improved preoxygenation efficacy in the presence of a bag-valve-mask mask leak. Supplemental nasal cannula oxygen improved nonrebreather face mask preoxygenation both with and without a mask leak. Supplemental nasal cannula oxygen may be helpful for preoxygenation before emergency airway management.
引用
收藏
页码:174 / 180
页数:7
相关论文
共 26 条
[11]   IMPOSED WORK AND OXYGEN DELIVERY DURING SPONTANEOUS BREATHING WITH ADULT DISPOSABLE MANUAL VENTILATORS [J].
HESS, D ;
HIRSCH, C ;
MARQUISDAMICO, C ;
KACMAREK, RM .
ANESTHESIOLOGY, 1994, 81 (05) :1256-1263
[12]   Techniques of preoxygenation in patients with ineffective face mask seal [J].
Kundra, Pankaj ;
Stephen, Shirley ;
Vinayagam, Stalin .
INDIAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2013, 57 (02) :175-179
[13]  
Kwei P, 2006, ANAESTH INTENS CARE, V34, P685
[14]   Pre-hospital anaesthesia: the same but different [J].
Lockey, D. J. ;
Crewdson, K. ;
Lossius, H. M. .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2014, 113 (02) :211-219
[15]   USING CONFIDENCE-INTERVALS IN WITHIN-SUBJECT DESIGNS [J].
LOFTUS, GR ;
MASSON, MEJ .
PSYCHONOMIC BULLETIN & REVIEW, 1994, 1 (04) :476-490
[16]   END-TIDAL OXYGEN MEASUREMENT COMPARED WITH PATIENT FACTOR ASSESSMENT FOR DETERMINING PREOXYGENATION TIME [J].
MACHLIN, HA ;
MYLES, PS ;
BERRY, CB ;
BUTLER, PJ ;
STORY, DA ;
HEATH, BJ .
ANAESTHESIA AND INTENSIVE CARE, 1993, 21 (04) :409-413
[17]   Efficacy of preoxygenation with tidal volume breathing - Comparison of breathing systems [J].
Nimmagadda, U ;
Salem, MR ;
Joseph, NJ ;
Lopez, G ;
Megally, M ;
Lang, DJ ;
Wafai, Y .
ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2000, 93 (03) :693-698
[18]  
Pournelle G. H., 1953, Journal of Mammalogy, V34, P133, DOI 10.1890/0012-9658(2002)083[1421:SDEOLC]2.0.CO
[19]  
2
[20]   Evaluation of the self-inflating bag-valve-mask and non-rebreather mask as preoxygenation devices in volunteers [J].
Robinson, Amelia ;
Ercole, Ari .
BMJ OPEN, 2012, 2 (05)