Efficacy of Nasal Cannula Oxygen as a Preoxygenation Adjunct in Emergency Airway Management

被引:41
作者
Hayes-Bradley, Clare [1 ]
Lewis, Anthony [2 ]
Burns, Brian [1 ,3 ]
Miller, Matt [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] New South Wales Ambulance, Greater Sydney Area Helicopter Emergency Med Serv, Retrieval Med, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[2] St George Hosp, Dept Anaesthesia, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[3] Univ Sydney, Sydney Med Sch, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
关键词
ANESTHESIA;
D O I
10.1016/j.annemergmed.2015.11.012
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Study objective: Although preoxygenation for emergency airway management is usually performed with nonrebreather face masks or bag-valve-mask devices, some clinicians also deliver supplemental high-flow oxygen by nasal cannula. We aim to measure the efficacy of supplemental nasal cannula oxygen delivery to conventional bag-valve-mask and nonrebreather face mask preoxygenation both with and without a simulated face mask leak. Methods: We conducted a randomized crossover trial using healthy volunteers. We randomized subjects to preoxygenation with bag-valve-mask or nonrebreather face mask. In random sequence, subjects underwent 3-minute trials of preoxygenation with oxygen through mask alone at 15 L/min, oxygen through mask at 15 L/min with standardized leak, oxygen through mask at 15 L/mind-oxygen through nasal cannula at 10 L/min, and oxygen through mask at 15 L/min-Foxygen through nasal cannula at 10 L/min with standardized leak. The primaryoutcome was single-breath exhalation end-tidal oxygen (Ero(2)). We compared Ero(2) between preoxygenation modalities, using nonparametric techniques. Results: We enrolled 60 subjects (30 nonrebreather face mask and 30 bag-valve-mask). In scenarios without a mask leak, Ero(2) was similar between bag-valve-mask and bag-valve-mask-Enasal cannula (mean 79% versus 75%; difference -3%; 95% confidence interval [Cl] -8% to 1%). In bag-valve-mask scenarios with a mask leak, Ero2 was higher for bag-valve-mask-Enasal cannula than bag-valve-mask alone (mean 66% versus 41%; difference 25%; 95% Cl 21% to 29%). Ero2 was higher for nonrebreather face mask+nasal cannula than nonrebreather face mask (mean 67% versus 52%; difference 15%; 95% Cl 12% to 18%). In nonrebreather face mask scenarios with a mask leak, Ero2 was higher for nonrebreather face mask-Enasal cannula than nonrebreather face mask (mean 65% versus 48%; difference 17%; 95% CI 13% to 20%). Conclusion: Although not aiding bag-valve-mask preoxygenation with a good mask seal, supplemental nasal cannula oxygen improved preoxygenation efficacy in the presence of a bag-valve-mask mask leak. Supplemental nasal cannula oxygen improved nonrebreather face mask preoxygenation both with and without a mask leak. Supplemental nasal cannula oxygen may be helpful for preoxygenation before emergency airway management.
引用
收藏
页码:174 / 180
页数:7
相关论文
共 26 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], EUR RESP J S57
[2]  
Baillard C, 2014, Ann Fr Anesth Reanim, V33, pe55, DOI 10.1016/j.annfar.2013.12.018
[3]  
Bouroche G, 2015, MINERVA ANESTESIOL, V81, P910
[4]  
Bretz F., 2010, Multiple Comparisons Using R, DOI DOI 10.1201/9781420010909
[5]  
CARMICHAEL FJ, 1989, ANESTH ANALG, V68, P406
[6]  
Cohen J, 2013, Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences, DOI [10.4324/9780203771587, DOI 10.4324/9780203771587]
[7]   How to preoxygenate in operative room: Healthy subjects and situations "at risk" [J].
De Jong, A. ;
Futier, E. ;
Millot, A. ;
Coisel, Y. ;
Jung, B. ;
Chanques, G. ;
Baillard, C. ;
Jaber, S. .
ANNALES FRANCAISES D ANESTHESIE ET DE REANIMATION, 2014, 33 (7-8) :457-461
[8]  
De Rosario-Martinez H., 2015, R package version 0.2-1
[9]  
Gagnon C, 2006, CAN J ANAESTH, V53, P86, DOI 10.1007/BF03021532
[10]  
GE Healthcare, 2005, DAT OHM S 5 TECHN RE