A comparison between enriched and nonenriched enrollment randomized withdrawal trials of opioids for chronic noncancer pain

被引:83
作者
Furlan, Andrea D. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Chaparro, Luis E. [4 ]
Irvin, Emma [1 ]
Mailis-Gagnon, Angela [3 ,4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Toronto, Inst Work & Hlth, Toronto, ON M5G 2E9, Canada
[2] Univ Toronto, Toronto Rehabil Inst, Toronto, ON M5G 2E9, Canada
[3] Univ Toronto, Dept Med, Div Physiatry, Toronto, ON M5G 2E9, Canada
[4] Toronto Western Hosp, Comprehens Pain Program, Toronto, ON M5T 2S8, Canada
[5] Toronto Western Hosp, Krembil Neurosci Ctr, Toronto, ON M5T 2S8, Canada
关键词
Chronic pain; Enriched design; Meta-analysis; Opioids; Systematic review; CONTROLLED-RELEASE OXYCODONE; OXYMORPHONE EXTENDED-RELEASE; TRAMADOL/ACETAMINOPHEN COMBINATION TABLETS; CHRONIC NEUROPATHIC PAIN; LOW-BACK-PAIN; DOUBLE-BLIND; ANALGESIC EFFICACY; OSTEOARTHRITIS PAIN; POSTHERPETIC NEURALGIA; CLINICAL-TRIAL;
D O I
10.1155/2011/465281
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
AD Furlan, LE Chaparro, E Irvin, A Mailis-Gagnon. A comparison between enriched and nonenriched enrollment randomized withdrawal trials of opioids for chronic noncancer pain. Pain Res Manage 2011;16(5):337-351. BACKGROUND: An enriched enrollment randomized withdrawal (EERW) design excludes potential participants who are nonresponders or who cannot tolerate the experimental drug before random assignment. It is unclear whether EERW design has an influence on the efficacy and safety of opioids for chronic noncancer pain (CNCP). OBJECTIVES: The primary objective was to compare the results from EERW and non-EERW trials of opioids for CHOP. Secondary objectives were to compare weak versus strong opioids, subgroups of patients with different types of pain, and the efficacy of plods compared with placebo versus other drugs. METHODS: MEDLINE, EMBASE and CENTRAL were searched up to July 2009, for randomized controlled trials of any opioid for CHOP. Meta-analyses and meta-regressions were conducted to compare the results. Treatment efficacy was assessed by effect sizes (small, medium and large) and the incidence of adverse effects was assessed by a clinically relevant mean difference of 10% or greater. RESULTS: Sixty-two randomized trials were included. In 61 trials, the duration was less than 16 weeks. There was no difference in efficacy between EERW and non-EERW trials for both pain (P=0.6) and function (P=0.3). However, EERW trials failed to detect a clinically relevant difference for nausea, vomiting, somnolence, dizziness and dry skin/itching compared with non-EERW. Opioids were more effective than placebo in patients with nociceptive pain (effect size=0.60, 95% CI 0.49 to 0.72) and neuropathic pain (effect size=0.56, 95% CI 0.38 to 0.73). CONCLUSION: EERW trial designs appear not to bias the results of efficacy, but they underestimate the adverse effects. The present updated meta-analysis shows that weak and strong opioids are effective for CNCP of both nociceptive and neuropathic origin.
引用
收藏
页码:337 / 351
页数:15
相关论文
共 78 条
  • [41] Morphine responsiveness, efficacy and tolerability in patients with chronic non-tumor associated pain - results of a double-blind placebo-controlled trial (MONTAS)
    Maier, C
    Hildebrandt, J
    Klinger, R
    Henrich-Eberl, C
    Lindena, G
    [J]. PAIN, 2002, 97 (03) : 223 - 233
  • [42] Treatment of persistent pain associated with osteoarthritis with controlled-release oxycodone tablets in a randomized controlled clinical trial
    Markenson, JA
    Croft, J
    Zhang, PG
    Richards, P
    [J]. CLINICAL JOURNAL OF PAIN, 2005, 21 (06) : 524 - 535
  • [43] Oxymorphone extended-release tablets relieve moderate to severe pain and improve physical function in osteoarthritis: Results of a randomized, double-blind, placebo- and active-controlled phase III trial
    Matsumoto, AK
    Babul, N
    Ahdieh, H
    [J]. PAIN MEDICINE, 2005, 6 (05) : 357 - 366
  • [44] Enriched enrolment with randomised withdrawal (EERW): Time for a new look at clinical trial design in chronic pain
    McQuay, Henry J.
    Derry, Sheena
    Moore, R. Andrew
    Poulain, Philippe
    Legout, Valerie
    [J]. PAIN, 2008, 135 (03) : 217 - 220
  • [45] Randomised trial of oral morphine for chronic non-cancer pain
    Moulin, DE
    Iezzi, A
    Amireh, R
    Sharpe, WKJ
    Boyd, D
    Merskey, H
    [J]. LANCET, 1996, 347 (8995) : 143 - 147
  • [46] Long-term opioid management for chronic noncancer pain
    Noble, M.
    Treadwell, J. R.
    Tregear, S. J.
    Coates, V. H.
    Wiffen, P. J.
    Akafomo, C.
    Schoelles, K. M.
    [J]. COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2010, (01):
  • [47] Tramadol in Neuropathic Pain After Spinal Cord Injury A Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Trial
    Norrbrink, Cecilia
    Lundeberg, Thomas
    [J]. CLINICAL JOURNAL OF PAIN, 2009, 25 (03) : 177 - 184
  • [48] Oral or transdermal opioids for osteoarthritis of the knee or hip
    Nueesch, Eveline
    Rutjes, Anne W. S.
    Husni, Elaine
    Welch, Vivian
    Jueni, Peter
    [J]. COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2009, (04):
  • [49] JOINT PAIN AND QUALITY OF LIFE - RESULTS OF A RANDOMIZED TRIAL
    PARR, G
    DAREKAR, B
    FLETCHER, A
    BULPITT, CJ
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY, 1989, 27 (02) : 235 - 242
  • [50] Intraindividual differences in pain relief and functional improvement in osteoarthritis with diclofenac or tramadol
    Pavelka, K
    Pelisková, Z
    Stehlíková, H
    Ratcliffe, S
    Repas, C
    [J]. CLINICAL DRUG INVESTIGATION, 1998, 16 (06) : 421 - 429