A comparison between enriched and nonenriched enrollment randomized withdrawal trials of opioids for chronic noncancer pain
被引:83
作者:
Furlan, Andrea D.
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Univ Toronto, Inst Work & Hlth, Toronto, ON M5G 2E9, Canada
Univ Toronto, Toronto Rehabil Inst, Toronto, ON M5G 2E9, Canada
Univ Toronto, Dept Med, Div Physiatry, Toronto, ON M5G 2E9, CanadaUniv Toronto, Inst Work & Hlth, Toronto, ON M5G 2E9, Canada
Furlan, Andrea D.
[1
,2
,3
]
Chaparro, Luis E.
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Toronto Western Hosp, Comprehens Pain Program, Toronto, ON M5T 2S8, CanadaUniv Toronto, Inst Work & Hlth, Toronto, ON M5G 2E9, Canada
Chaparro, Luis E.
[4
]
Irvin, Emma
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Univ Toronto, Inst Work & Hlth, Toronto, ON M5G 2E9, CanadaUniv Toronto, Inst Work & Hlth, Toronto, ON M5G 2E9, Canada
Irvin, Emma
[1
]
Mailis-Gagnon, Angela
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Univ Toronto, Dept Med, Div Physiatry, Toronto, ON M5G 2E9, Canada
Toronto Western Hosp, Comprehens Pain Program, Toronto, ON M5T 2S8, Canada
Toronto Western Hosp, Krembil Neurosci Ctr, Toronto, ON M5T 2S8, CanadaUniv Toronto, Inst Work & Hlth, Toronto, ON M5G 2E9, Canada
Mailis-Gagnon, Angela
[3
,4
,5
]
机构:
[1] Univ Toronto, Inst Work & Hlth, Toronto, ON M5G 2E9, Canada
[2] Univ Toronto, Toronto Rehabil Inst, Toronto, ON M5G 2E9, Canada
[3] Univ Toronto, Dept Med, Div Physiatry, Toronto, ON M5G 2E9, Canada
[4] Toronto Western Hosp, Comprehens Pain Program, Toronto, ON M5T 2S8, Canada
[5] Toronto Western Hosp, Krembil Neurosci Ctr, Toronto, ON M5T 2S8, Canada
AD Furlan, LE Chaparro, E Irvin, A Mailis-Gagnon. A comparison between enriched and nonenriched enrollment randomized withdrawal trials of opioids for chronic noncancer pain. Pain Res Manage 2011;16(5):337-351. BACKGROUND: An enriched enrollment randomized withdrawal (EERW) design excludes potential participants who are nonresponders or who cannot tolerate the experimental drug before random assignment. It is unclear whether EERW design has an influence on the efficacy and safety of opioids for chronic noncancer pain (CNCP). OBJECTIVES: The primary objective was to compare the results from EERW and non-EERW trials of opioids for CHOP. Secondary objectives were to compare weak versus strong opioids, subgroups of patients with different types of pain, and the efficacy of plods compared with placebo versus other drugs. METHODS: MEDLINE, EMBASE and CENTRAL were searched up to July 2009, for randomized controlled trials of any opioid for CHOP. Meta-analyses and meta-regressions were conducted to compare the results. Treatment efficacy was assessed by effect sizes (small, medium and large) and the incidence of adverse effects was assessed by a clinically relevant mean difference of 10% or greater. RESULTS: Sixty-two randomized trials were included. In 61 trials, the duration was less than 16 weeks. There was no difference in efficacy between EERW and non-EERW trials for both pain (P=0.6) and function (P=0.3). However, EERW trials failed to detect a clinically relevant difference for nausea, vomiting, somnolence, dizziness and dry skin/itching compared with non-EERW. Opioids were more effective than placebo in patients with nociceptive pain (effect size=0.60, 95% CI 0.49 to 0.72) and neuropathic pain (effect size=0.56, 95% CI 0.38 to 0.73). CONCLUSION: EERW trial designs appear not to bias the results of efficacy, but they underestimate the adverse effects. The present updated meta-analysis shows that weak and strong opioids are effective for CNCP of both nociceptive and neuropathic origin.
引用
收藏
页码:337 / 351
页数:15
相关论文
共 78 条
[1]
[Anonymous], TABLE 2 OPIOID ANALG
[2]
[Anonymous], S AFR MED J S1
[3]
[Anonymous], BR J CLIN RES
[4]
[Anonymous], 1988, Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences