Analysis and prediction of water quality using deep learning and auto deep learning techniques

被引:70
作者
Prasad, D. Venkata Vara [1 ,3 ]
Venkataramana, Lokeswari Y. [1 ,3 ]
Kumar, P. Senthil [2 ,3 ]
Prasannamedha, G. [2 ,3 ]
Harshana, S. [1 ]
Srividya, S. Jahnavi [1 ]
Harrinei, K. [1 ]
Indraganti, Sravya [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Sri Sivasubramaniya Nadar Coll Engn, Dept Comp Sci & Engn, Chennai 603110, Tamil Nadu, India
[2] Sri Sivasubramaniya Nadar Coll Engn, Dept Chem Engn, Chennai 603110, Tamil Nadu, India
[3] Sri Sivasubramaniya Nadar Coll Engn, Ctr Excellence Water Res CEWAR, Chennai 603110, Tamil Nadu, India
关键词
Water quality analysis; Auto DL; Artificial Intelligence; Water Quality Index; HYPERPARAMETER OPTIMIZATION; ALGORITHMS;
D O I
10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.153311
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Natural water sources like ponds, lakes and rivers are facing a great threat because of activities like discharge of untreated industrial effluents, sewage water, wastes, etc. It is mandatory to examine the water quality to ensure that only safe water is available for consumption. Traditional methods of water quality inspection are a cumbersome process and hence, Artificial Intelligence (AI) can be used as a catalyst for this process. AutoDL is an upcoming field to automate deep learning pipelines and enables model creation and interpretation with minimal code. However, it is still in the nascent stage. This work explores the suitability of adopting AutoDL for Water Quality Assessment by drawing a comparison between AutoDL and a conventional models and analysis to foresee the quality of the water, an appropriate class based on Water Quality Index segregating water bodies into different classes. The accuracy of conventional DL is 1.8% higher than that of AutoDL for binary class water data. The accuracy of conventional DL is 1% higher than that of AutoDL for multiclass water data. The accuracy of conventional model was similar to 98% to similar to 99% whereas AutoDL method yielded similar to 96% to similar to 98%. However, the AutoDL model ease the task of finding the appropriate DL model and proved better efficiency without manual intervention.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 39 条
[1]  
Ahmad Z, 2017, INT J RIVER BASIN MA, V15, P79, DOI 10.1080/15715124.2016.1256297
[2]   Efficient Water Quality Prediction Using Supervised Machine Learning [J].
Ahmed, Umair ;
Mumtaz, Rafia ;
Anwar, Hirra ;
Shah, Asad A. ;
Irfan, Rabia ;
Garcia-Nieto, Jose .
WATER, 2019, 11 (11)
[3]   RETRACTED: Water Quality Prediction Using Artificial Intelligence Algorithms (Retracted Article) [J].
Aldhyani, Theyazn H. H. ;
Al-Yaari, Mohammed ;
Alkahtani, Hasan ;
Maashi, Mashael .
APPLIED BIONICS AND BIOMECHANICS, 2020, 2020
[4]   Prediction of Water Level and Water Quality Using a CNN-LSTM Combined Deep Learning Approach [J].
Baek, Sang-Soo ;
Pyo, Jongcheol ;
Chun, Jong Ahn .
WATER, 2020, 12 (12)
[5]   Short-term water quality variable prediction using a hybrid CNN-LSTM deep learning model [J].
Barzegar, Rahim ;
Aalami, Mohammad Taghi ;
Adamowski, Jan .
STOCHASTIC ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND RISK ASSESSMENT, 2020, 34 (02) :415-433
[6]   Large-scale water quality prediction with integrated deep neural network [J].
Bi, Jing ;
Lin, Yongze ;
Dong, Quanxi ;
Yuan, Haitao ;
Zhou, MengChu .
INFORMATION SCIENCES, 2021, 571 (571) :191-205
[7]   SMOTE: Synthetic minority over-sampling technique [J].
Chawla, Nitesh V. ;
Bowyer, Kevin W. ;
Hall, Lawrence O. ;
Kegelmeyer, W. Philip .
2002, American Association for Artificial Intelligence (16)
[8]   A Review of the Artificial Neural Network Models for Water Quality Prediction [J].
Chen, Yingyi ;
Song, Lihua ;
Liu, Yeqi ;
Yang, Ling ;
Li, Daoliang .
APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL, 2020, 10 (17)
[9]   Assessing the Performance of Deep Learning Algorithms for Short-Term Surface Water Quality Prediction [J].
Choi, Heelak ;
Suh, Sang-Ik ;
Kim, Su-Hee ;
Han, Eun Jin ;
Ki, Seo Jin .
SUSTAINABILITY, 2021, 13 (19)
[10]  
Elshawi R., 2019, Automated machine learning: State-of-the-art and open challenges