Development of a brief diabetes distress screening instrument

被引:327
作者
Fisher, Lawrence [1 ]
Glasgow, Russell E. [2 ]
Mullan, Joseph T. [3 ]
Skaff, Marilyn M. [1 ]
Polonsky, William H. [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif San Francisco, Dept Family & Community Med, San Francisco, CA 94143 USA
[2] Kaiser Permanente Colorado, Inst Hlth Res, Ctr Disseminat & Implementat Res, Denver, CO USA
[3] Univ Calif San Francisco, Dept Social & Behav Sci, Sch Nursing, San Francisco, CA 94143 USA
[4] Univ Calif San Diego, Dept Psychiat, San Diego, CA 92103 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1370/afm.842
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
PURPOSE Previous research has documented that diabetes distress, defined as patient concerns about disease management, support, emotional burden, and access to care, is an important condition distinct from depression. We wanted to develop a brief diabetes distress screen instrument for use in clinical settings. METHODS We assessed 496 community-based patients with type 2 diabetes on the previously validated, 17-item Diabetes Distress Scale (DDS17) and 6 biobehavioral measures: glycated hemoglobin (HbA(1c)); non-high-density-lipoprotein (non-HDL) cholesterol; kilocalories, percentage of calories from fat, and number of fruit and vegetable servings consumed per day; and physical activity as measured by the international Physical Activity Questionnaire. RESULTS An average item score of 3 (moderate distress) discriminated high from low-distressed subgroups. The 4 DDS17 items with the highest correlations with the DDS17 total (r = .56-.61) were selected. Composites, comprised of 2, 3, and 4 of these items (DDS2, DDS3, DDS4), yielded higher correlations (r = .69.71). The sensitivity and specificity of the composites were .95 and .85, .93 and .87, and .97 and .86, respectively. The DDS3 had a lower sensitivity and higher percentages of false-negative and false-positive results. All 3 composites significantly discriminated subgroups on HbA(1c), non-HDL cholesterol, and kilocalories consumed per day; none discriminated subgroups on fruit and vegetable servings consumed per day; and only the DDS3 yielded significant results on the International Physical Activity Questionnaire. Because of its psychometric properties and brevity, the DDS2 was selected as a screening instrument. CONCLUSIONS The DDS2 is a 2-item diabetes distress screening instrument asking respondents to rate on a 6-point scale the degree to which the following items caused distress: (1) feeling overwhelmed by the demands of living with diabetes, and (2) feeling that I am often failing with my diabetes regimen. The DDS17 can be administered to those who have positive findings on the DDS2 to define the content of distress and to direct intervention.
引用
收藏
页码:246 / 252
页数:7
相关论文
共 15 条
  • [1] Compendium of Physical Activities: an update of activity codes and MET intensities
    Ainsworth, BE
    Haskell, WL
    Whitt, MC
    Irwin, ML
    Swartz, AM
    Strath, SJ
    O'Brien, WL
    Bassett, DR
    Schmitz, KH
    Emplaincourt, PO
    Jacobs, DR
    Leon, AS
    [J]. MEDICINE AND SCIENCE IN SPORTS AND EXERCISE, 2000, 32 (09) : S498 - S516
  • [2] Anderson RJ, 2000, DIABETES, V49, pA64
  • [3] Depression predicts increased incidence of adverse health outcomes in older Mexican Americans with type 2 diabetes
    Black, SA
    Markides, KS
    Ray, LA
    [J]. DIABETES CARE, 2003, 26 (10) : 2822 - 2828
  • [4] Block G, 1990, Epidemiology, V1, P58, DOI 10.1097/00001648-199001000-00013
  • [5] Depression and diabetes -: Impact of depression symptoms on adherence, function, costs
    Ciechanowski, PS
    Katon, WJ
    Russo, JE
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2000, 160 (21) : 3278 - 3285
  • [6] Effects of depression on work loss and disability bed days in individuals with diabetes
    Egede, LE
    [J]. DIABETES CARE, 2004, 27 (07) : 1751 - 1753
  • [7] Clinical depression versus distress among patients with type 2 diabetes - Not just a question of semantics
    Fisher, Lawrence
    Skaff, Marilyn M.
    Mullan, Joseph T.
    Arean, Patricia
    Mohr, David
    Masharani, Umesh
    Glasgow, Russell
    Laurencin, Grace
    [J]. DIABETES CARE, 2007, 30 (03) : 542 - 548
  • [8] How to screen for depression and emotional problems in patients with diabetes: comparison of screening characteristics of depression questionnaires, measurement of diabetes-specific emotional problems and standard clinical assessment
    Hermanns, N
    Kulzer, B
    Krichbaum, M
    Kubiak, T
    Haak, T
    [J]. DIABETOLOGIA, 2006, 49 (03) : 469 - 477
  • [9] The pathways study - A randomized trial of collaborative care in patients with diabetes and depression
    Katon, WJ
    Von Korff, M
    Lin, EHB
    Simon, G
    Ludman, E
    Russo, J
    Ciechanowski, P
    Walker, W
    Bush, T
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF GENERAL PSYCHIATRY, 2004, 61 (10) : 1042 - 1049
  • [10] Mullan JT, 2006, DIABETES, V55, pA426