Impact of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol on gastrointestinal function in gynecologic oncology patients undergoing laparotomy

被引:52
|
作者
Boitano, Teresa K. L. [1 ]
Smith, Haller J. [2 ]
Rushton, Tullia [1 ]
Johnston, Mary C. [3 ]
Lawson, Prentiss [4 ]
Leath, Charles A., III [2 ]
Xhaja, Anisa [5 ]
Guthrie, Meredith P. [5 ]
Straughn, J. Michael, Jr. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Alabama Birmingham, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Birmingham, AL 35294 USA
[2] Univ Alabama Birmingham, Div Gynecol Oncol, Birmingham, AL USA
[3] Univ Alabama Birmingham, Sch Med, Birmingham, AL USA
[4] Univ Alabama Birmingham, Dept Anesthesiol, Birmingham, AL USA
[5] Univ Alabama Birmingham, UAB Care, Birmingham, AL USA
关键词
Enhanced recovery after surgery; Ileus rates; Perioperative surgical management; Gastrointestinal function; Multimodal analgesia; Perioperative pain management; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED-TRIALS; POSTOPERATIVE ILEUS; SOCIETY RECOMMENDATIONS; ANALGESIA; PATHWAYS; METAANALYSIS; GUIDELINES; COLECTOMY; ALVIMOPAN; OVARIAN;
D O I
10.1016/j.ygyno.2018.09.009
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Objective. To evaluate the impact of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) on postoperative gastrointestinal function in gynecologic oncology patients. Methods. This retrospective cohort study compared gynecology oncology patients undergoing non-emergent laparotomy from 10/2016 to 6/2017 managed on an ERAS protocol to a control cohort from the year prior to ERAS implementation. Major changes to postoperative care after ERAS implementation included multimodal analgesia, early feeding, goal-directed fluid resuscitation, and early ambulation. The primary outcome was rate of postoperative ileus, defined as nausea and vomiting requiring nothing-per-mouth status or nasogastric tube (NGT) placement Secondary outcomes included length of stay (LOS) and 30-day readmission. Results. 376 patients met inclusion criteria; 197 in the control group and 179 in the ERAS group. Patient demographics were similar between groups. Ileus rate was significantly lower in the ERAS group (2.8% vs. 15.7%; p < 0.001), and fewer patients in the ERAS group required NGT placement (2.2% vs. 7.1%; p = 0.06). ERAS remained independently associated with decreased ileus rates when controlling for other patient and surgical factors (OR 0.2; p = 0.01). Epidural use was correlated with a significant increase in ileus risk (OR 2.6; p = 0.03), as was increased Charlson Comorbidity Index (OR 1.2; p < 0.01). LOS was significantly decreased in the ERAS group (2.9 vs. 4.0 days; p = 0.04), while 30-day readmission rates were similar (10.1% vs. 10.7%; p = 0.62). Conclusions. Implementation of an ERAS protocol significantly decreases the risk of postoperative ileus in gynecologic oncology patients undergoing laparotomy. ERAS also reduced LOS compared to pre-ERAS controls. (C) 2018 Published by Elsevier Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:282 / 286
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] ENHANCED RECOVERY AFTER SURGERY FOR GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY PATIENTS UNDERGOING LAPAROTOMY DURING THE COVID19 PANDEMIC
    Boucher, Julia
    Chen, Innie
    Jamil, Abdul
    Le, Tien
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGICAL CANCER, 2022, 32 : A125 - A125
  • [12] Outcomes of Enhanced Recovery after Surgery (ERAS) in Gynecologic Oncology: A Review
    Bisch, Steven P.
    Nelson, Gregg
    CURRENT ONCOLOGY, 2022, 29 (02) : 631 - 640
  • [13] OUTCOMES OF OBESE PATIENTS UNDERGOING GYNECOLOGIC SURGERY ON AN ENHANCED RECOVERY AFTER SURGERY (ERAS) PROGRAM
    Harrison, R.
    Iniesta, M. D.
    Cain, K.
    Siverand, A.
    Pitcher, B.
    Lasala, J.
    Ramirez, P. T.
    Meyer, L. A.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGICAL CANCER, 2019, 29 : A154 - A154
  • [14] The impact of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) on patients undergoing oesophagectomy
    Dent, Barry
    Taylor, Claire
    Sturrock, Jill
    Jaretzke, Helen
    Mckenna, Janine
    Immanuel, Arul
    Griffin, S. Michael
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2018, 105 : 26 - 26
  • [15] European Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) gynecologic oncology survey: Status of ERAS protocol implementation across Europe
    Gomez-Hidalgo, Natalia R.
    Pletnev, Andrei
    Razumova, Zoia
    Bizzarri, Nicolo
    Selcuk, Ilker
    Theofanakis, Charalampos
    Zalewski, Kamil
    Nikolova, Tanja
    Lanner, Maximilian
    Kacperczyk-Bartnik, Joanna
    El Hajj, Houssein
    Perez-Benavente, Assumpcio
    Nelson, Gregg
    Gil-Moreno, Antonio
    Fotopoulou, Christina
    Luis Sanchez-Iglesias, Jose
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY & OBSTETRICS, 2023, 160 (01) : 306 - 312
  • [16] Impact of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) program in gynecologic oncology and patient satisfaction.
    Fernandez, Sara
    Trombert-Paviot, Beatrice
    Raia-Barjat, Tiphaine
    Chauleur, Celine
    JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY OBSTETRICS AND HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2023, 52 (02)
  • [17] THE IMPLEMENTATION OF A PREHABILITATION AND ENHANCED RECOVERY AFTER SURGERY (ERAS) PROGRAM FOR PATIENTS UNDERGOING SURGERY FOR GYNECOLOGIC CANCER: COMPLIANCE AND IMPACT ON RECOVERY OUTCOMES
    Farres Rubi, Alba
    Teixeira, Natalia
    Soler Moreno, Cristina
    Munoz Sanchez, Rquel
    Magret, Eva
    Rovira Negre, Ramon
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGICAL CANCER, 2023, 33 : A224 - A224
  • [18] Enhanced Recovery after Surgery (ERAS) for Minimally Invasive Gynecologic Oncology Surgery: A Review
    Aubrey, Christa
    Nelson, Gregg
    CURRENT ONCOLOGY, 2023, 30 (10) : 9357 - 9366
  • [19] THE IMPACT OF AN ENHANCED RECOVERY AFTER SURGERY (ERAS) PROTOCOL IN PATIENTS UNDERGOING ABDOMINAL HYSTERECTOMIES IN A TEACHING HOSPITAL
    Alvarenga Bezerra, V.
    Marcal Rios, G.
    Seixas Mengai, A. C.
    Amaral Tavares Daltro, C.
    Podgaec, S.
    Granado Barbosa, M.
    Tamura Vieira Gomes, M.
    Anderman Silva Barison, G.
    Rolla, F.
    Cristiane da Silva, E.
    Nicolau Ferreira Ache, P.
    Ferraz Assir, F.
    Moretti Marques, R.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGICAL CANCER, 2019, 29 : A27 - A27
  • [20] Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) does not have a significant impact after minimally invasive surgery in gynecologic oncology
    Lehman, A.
    Higgins, R. V.
    Kemp, E. V.
    Brown, J.
    Crane, E. K.
    Tait, D. L.
    Taylor, V. D.
    Naumann, R. W.
    GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2020, 159 : 281 - 281