共 50 条
Impact of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol on gastrointestinal function in gynecologic oncology patients undergoing laparotomy
被引:52
|作者:
Boitano, Teresa K. L.
[1
]
Smith, Haller J.
[2
]
Rushton, Tullia
[1
]
Johnston, Mary C.
[3
]
Lawson, Prentiss
[4
]
Leath, Charles A., III
[2
]
Xhaja, Anisa
[5
]
Guthrie, Meredith P.
[5
]
Straughn, J. Michael, Jr.
[2
]
机构:
[1] Univ Alabama Birmingham, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Birmingham, AL 35294 USA
[2] Univ Alabama Birmingham, Div Gynecol Oncol, Birmingham, AL USA
[3] Univ Alabama Birmingham, Sch Med, Birmingham, AL USA
[4] Univ Alabama Birmingham, Dept Anesthesiol, Birmingham, AL USA
[5] Univ Alabama Birmingham, UAB Care, Birmingham, AL USA
关键词:
Enhanced recovery after surgery;
Ileus rates;
Perioperative surgical management;
Gastrointestinal function;
Multimodal analgesia;
Perioperative pain management;
RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED-TRIALS;
POSTOPERATIVE ILEUS;
SOCIETY RECOMMENDATIONS;
ANALGESIA;
PATHWAYS;
METAANALYSIS;
GUIDELINES;
COLECTOMY;
ALVIMOPAN;
OVARIAN;
D O I:
10.1016/j.ygyno.2018.09.009
中图分类号:
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号:
100214 ;
摘要:
Objective. To evaluate the impact of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) on postoperative gastrointestinal function in gynecologic oncology patients. Methods. This retrospective cohort study compared gynecology oncology patients undergoing non-emergent laparotomy from 10/2016 to 6/2017 managed on an ERAS protocol to a control cohort from the year prior to ERAS implementation. Major changes to postoperative care after ERAS implementation included multimodal analgesia, early feeding, goal-directed fluid resuscitation, and early ambulation. The primary outcome was rate of postoperative ileus, defined as nausea and vomiting requiring nothing-per-mouth status or nasogastric tube (NGT) placement Secondary outcomes included length of stay (LOS) and 30-day readmission. Results. 376 patients met inclusion criteria; 197 in the control group and 179 in the ERAS group. Patient demographics were similar between groups. Ileus rate was significantly lower in the ERAS group (2.8% vs. 15.7%; p < 0.001), and fewer patients in the ERAS group required NGT placement (2.2% vs. 7.1%; p = 0.06). ERAS remained independently associated with decreased ileus rates when controlling for other patient and surgical factors (OR 0.2; p = 0.01). Epidural use was correlated with a significant increase in ileus risk (OR 2.6; p = 0.03), as was increased Charlson Comorbidity Index (OR 1.2; p < 0.01). LOS was significantly decreased in the ERAS group (2.9 vs. 4.0 days; p = 0.04), while 30-day readmission rates were similar (10.1% vs. 10.7%; p = 0.62). Conclusions. Implementation of an ERAS protocol significantly decreases the risk of postoperative ileus in gynecologic oncology patients undergoing laparotomy. ERAS also reduced LOS compared to pre-ERAS controls. (C) 2018 Published by Elsevier Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:282 / 286
页数:5
相关论文