POLANYI AND GRENE ON MERLEAU-PONTY: HISTORICAL NOTES WITH FOOTNOTES TO CHARLES TAYLOR, FRANCIS WALSHE, F. S. ROTHSCHILD, AND GILBERT RYLE

This historically oriented essay treats Michael Polanyi and Marjorie Grenes' discussions of Maurice Merleau-Ponty in their correspondence in the 1960s. It traces Grenes' growing enthusiasm for Merleau-Ponty and notes both Polanyis' criticism and praise for Merleau-Pontys' perspective in relation to his account of tacit knowing. The essay also comments on Polanyis' criticism of Gilbert Ryle and his effort to align his perspective with Francis Walshs' and F. S. Rothchilds' neurophysiological ideas about the operation of mind. I discuss the innovative Ford Foundation-funded conference program, spearheaded by Polanyi and Grene, that brought together an interdisciplinary group of scholars interested in transforming the prevailing philosophical paradigm. This project is the context in which discussion about Merleau-Ponty, Polanyi, and other figures flourished and Grene produced a complicated but fascinating set of little-known publications.